Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:01:04.613Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sugarman v. Dougall. 93 S.Ct.2842

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2017

Alona E. Evans
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial Decisions
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 68 , Issue 2 , April 1974 , pp. 335 - 336
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 One appellant was a national of Guyana, two were nationals of the Dominican Republic, while the fourth was a national of El Salvador.

2 330 F.Supp. 265 (S.D.N.Y. 1971) (cited by court).

3 339 F.Supp. 906 (S.D.N.Y. 1971) (cited by court).

4 93 S. Ct. 2842, 2847 (1973).

5 403 U.S. 365 (1971) (cited by court).

6 93 S. Ct. 2842, 2850 (1973).

7 Ibid., 2861. Mr. Justice Rehnquist’s dissent applied also to the opinion banded down by the Court on the same day in In re Griffiths, 93 St. Ct. 2851 (1973); 68 AJIL 334 (1974).