Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T19:46:54.426Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

State of the Netherlands v. Federal Reserve Bank of New York. 201 F. (2d) 455

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2017

William W. Bishop Jr.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial Decisions
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 47 , Issue 3 , July 1953 , pp. 496 - 500
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 99 F. Supp. 655 (S.D.N.Y., May 14, 1951), digested in this Journal, Vol. 46 (1952), p. 149. An earlier decision in the same case by Judge Medina had upheld the application of The Netherlands Decree A–1. See 79 F. Supp. 966 (S.D.N.Y., Sept. 30, 1948).

2 Discussing Cities Service Co. v. McGrath, 342 U. 3. 330 (Jan. 28, 1952), decided after the District Court judgment in the principal case.

3 Citing note, 100 Univ. Pa. L. Rev. 764 (1952).

4 Here the court cited Agrocide v. Arsocid, Holland, Court of Appeal, The Hague (1946), Annual Digest 1947, No. 142; Public Prosecutor v. Reidar Haaland, Norway, Supreme Court, Appellate Division (1945), Annual Digest 1943–45, No. 154; Re Hoogeveen et al., Belgium, Court of Cassation (1944), Annual Digest 1943–45, No. 148; Stasiuk and Jagnycz v. Klewec, Poland, Supreme Court, Third Division (1927), Annual Digest 1927–28, No. 380; De Nimal v. De Nimal, Belgium, Court of Appeal of Brussels (1919), Annual Digest 1919–22, No. 311.

5 Here the court quoted briefly from McNair, “Municipal Effects of Belligerent Occupation,” 57 L. Q. Rev. 33, 73 (1941); Feilchenfeld, International Economic Law of Belligerent Occupation (1942), p. 135; and Stein, “Application of the Law of the Absent Sovereign in Territory under Belligerent Occupation: The Schio Massacre,” 46 Mich. L. Rev. 341, 362 (1948).

6 Citing Stein, “United States: Recovery of Property Confiscated by Enemy Occupant,” 1 Am. J. Comp. L. (1952) 261, 266.