Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T01:18:18.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Standing Up for Justice: The Challenges of Trying Atrocity Crimes. By Theodor Meron. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2021. Pp. xii, 347. Index.

Review products

Standing Up for Justice: The Challenges of Trying Atrocity Crimes. By Theodor Meron. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2021. Pp. xii, 347. Index.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2022

Antonio Coco
Antonio Coco*
Affiliation:
University of Essex
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 116 , Issue 2 , April 2022 , pp. 463 - 468
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press for The American Society of International Law

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Prosecutor v. Mrkšić and Šljivančanin, Case No. IT-95-13/1-A, Appeal Judgement, para. 73 (May 5, 2009).

2 Prosecutor v. Gotovina and Markać, Case No. IT-06-90-A, Appeal Judgement (Nov. 16, 2012). For criticism of the majority's reasoning and findings, see in particular the Dissenting Opinion of Judge Pocar, attached to the judgment.

3 Prosecutor v. Perišić, No. IT-04-81-A, Appeal Judgement (Feb. 28, 2013).

4 See, e.g., Carsten Stahn, Justice as Message: Expressivist Foundations of International Criminal Justice (2020).

5 Milošević v. Prosecutor, Case No. IT-02-54-AR73.7, Appeal on the Assignment of Defense Counsel, paras. 17–20 (Nov. 1, 2004).

6 Prosecutor v. Kunarac, Case No. IT-96-23 & IT-96-23/1-A, Appeal Judgement (June 12, 2002).

7 Prosecutor v. Tadić, Case No. IT–94–1–AR72, Appeal on Jurisdiction (Oct. 2, 1995).

8 To paraphrase the test employed in Prosecutor v. Furundžija, Case No. IT-95-17/1-A, Appeal Judgement, para. 189 (July 21, 2000).

9 Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Croatia v. Serb.), 2015 ICJ Rep. 3, 468–72 (Feb. 3).

10 Prosecutor v. Perišić, supra note 3. For an analysis of this judgment, see, inter alia, Coco, Antonio & Gal, Tom, Losing Direction: The ICTY Appeals Chamber's Controversial Approach to Aiding and Abetting in Perišić, 12 J. Int'l Crim. Just. 345 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.