Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T13:53:18.932Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Standard for Justice: A Critical Commentary on the Proposed Bill of Rights for New Zealand. By Jerome B. Elkind and Antony Shaw. Auckland: Oxford University Press, 1986. Pp. xvi, 238. Index. $22.95.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Hilary Charlesworth*
Affiliation:
Law School, University of Melbourne

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews and Notes
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See, e.g., Tushnet, , An Essay on Rights, 62 Tex. L. Rev. 1363, 136471 (1984)Google Scholar.

2 See id. at 1371–92; Olsen, , Statutory Rape: A Feminist Critique of Rights Analysis, 63 id. at 387, 42029 (1984)Google Scholar; Unger, , The Critical Legal Studies Movement, 96 Harv. L. Rev. 561, 597602 (1984)Google Scholar.

3 Kairys, , Freedom of Speech, in The Politics of Law 140, 141 (Kairys, D. ed. 1982)Google Scholar.

4 See, e.g., Gabel, , The Phenomenology of Rights-Consciousness and the Pact of the Withdrawn Selves, 62 Tex. L. Rev. 1563, 157880 (1984)Google Scholar.

5 Wi Parata v. Bishop of Wellington, 1878 NZ Jurist Reps, (n.s.) 72, 78–79 (Sup. Ct.); Hoani Te Heuheu Tukino v. Aotea District Maori Land Board, 1941 App. Cas. 308.