Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T19:09:52.248Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rich v. Naviera Vacuba, S.A. and Republic of Cuba; Mayan Lines, S.A. v. Republic of Cuba and the M/V Bahia de Nipe; United Fruit Sugar Co. v. 5,000 Tons of Sugar; Navarro and Others v. the M/V Bahia de Nipe. 295 F.2d 24

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2017

Covey Oliver
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial Decisions
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 56 , Issue 2 , April 1962 , pp. 550 - 552
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Per Curiam opinion in full. The opinion of Hoffman, D.J., below, 197 F.Supp. 710 (U. S. Dist. Ct., B. Dist., Virginia, Aug. 29, 1961) was affirmed, and should be consulted for detailed examination of the major problems, especially with respect to the issue of executive-judicial relationships involved in (1) the attempt of the Coast Guard to keep the U. S. Marshal from arresting the vessel and (2) the authority of the Department of State as to “suggestion and allowance” of immunity.

2 197 F. Supp. 710, at 714–715. Quoted above, pp. 527–528.