Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T18:09:24.212Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rex v. Cia. Pervana de Vapores, S.A. 660 F.2d 61

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial Decisions
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Rex v. Cia. Pervana de Vapores, S.A., 493 F.Supp. 459 (E.D. Pa. 1980).

2 See Williams v. The Shipping Corp. of India, 653 F.2d 875 (4th Cir. 1981); Ruggiero v. Compania Peruana de Vapores, et at, 639 F.2d 872 (2d Cir. 1981), 75 AJIL 664 (1981).

3 Under the FSIA, corporations owned by a foreign state are considered foreign states. 28 U.S.C. §1603 (1976).

4 The Seventh Amendment states in relevant part: “In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved. . . .”

5 660 F.2d 61, 63.

6 Mat 66.

7 Ibid.

8 Id. at 67 (emphasis added).

9 Id. at 68.

10 Id. at 69.

11 See, e.g., Pernell v. Southall Realty, 416 U.S. 363, 375 (1974); Curtis v. Loether, 415 U.S. 189, 193–94 (1974); Parsons v. Bedford, 28 U.S. (3 Pet.) 433, 446–47 (1830).

12 660 F.2d at 70.