Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T08:52:11.427Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Regulation of International Banking. By Richard Dale. Cambridge: Wood-head-Faulkner; Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1986. Pp. viii, 208. Index. $29.95.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Samuel W. Bettwy*
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Justice

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews and Notes
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 As described by Arthur Burns, F., former Chairman of the U.S. Federal Reserve Board. Seep. 181 Google Scholar.

2 Furthermore, Dale states: “[T]he explosive growth of multinational banking is tending to out-distance the individual capabilities of national regulatory authorities” (p. 175).

3 The country studies cover Belgium, Canada, France, Hong Kong, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Singapore, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, the United States and West Germany.

4 [P]reventive regulation [is] designed to curb risk-taking by banks and thereby reduce the likelihood of liquidity and solvency problems; and protective regulation [is] designed to provide support to both banks and their depositors should problems in fact arise” (p. 55).

5 Eurocurrency markets are “markets in currencies deposited outside their country of issue” (p. 2).

6 “[I]t is paradoxical that investors should be prepared to lend indirectly via the international banking system to countries they would not consider lending to directly” (p. 11).

7 In addition to the countries listed in note 3 supra, Dale briefly describes the degrees of regulation in Australia, the Philippines, Taiwan, Bahrain and the Caribbean offshore centers of Panama, the Bahamas and the Caymans.

8 “There is an information gap that needs to be closed through the provision of more comprehensive and timely data on country indebtedness than currently exist” (p. 86).

9 Reprinted in appendix 1, at 188–94.