Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T08:39:59.533Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Recognition and Non-Recognition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2017

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial Comment
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1942

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Vol. 35 (1941), p. 605.

2 Luther v. Sagor, [1921] 3 K. B. 532.

3 Wulfsohn ». Russian Socialist Federated Soviet Republic, 234 N. Y. 372, 13g N. E. 24 (1923).

4 Cf. VTadikavkazsky Railway Co. v. New York Trust Co., 263 N. Y. 369 (1934), and Nebolsine, "The Recovery of the Foreign Assets of Nationalized Russian Corporations," 39 Yale L. J. 1130 (1930).

5 Cf. John Bassett Moore, "Candor and Common Sense," An Address Delivered at the Bar Association of New York City, 1930, p. 13.

6 Or is "legal" recognition, in Kelsen's view, obligatory?

7 Cf. Sir John Fischer Williams, "Some Thoughts on the Doctrine of Recognition in International Law," 47 Harv. L. Rev. 776 (1934); also Arnold Raestad in 17 Rev. Dr. Int. et Ug. Comp. 257 (1936).

8 We are accustomed, inaccurately, to speak of the status of a state before international recognition as de facto. An analysis of this misconception was attempted in an article "The Unrecognized Government in American Courts," this JOURNAL, Vol. 26 (1932), p. 261.

9 Cf. Moore, Digest of International Law, I, 73.

10 Moore, op. eii., p. 72.

11 Baty, "So-called De Facto Recognition," 31 Yale L. J. 470 (1921).

12 Legal Problems in the Far Eastern Conflict, Institute of Pacific Relations, 1941, p. 157 et seq.