Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:17:18.227Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

International Maritime Boundaries (Vol. V). Edited by David A. Colson and Robert W. Smith. Dordrecht, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 2005. Pp. xxxii, 920. Index. $551, €385.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Jan Paulsson*
Affiliation:
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Recent Books on International Law
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 2001 ICJ REP. 40, para. 173 (Mar. 16).

2 Barbados v. Trinidad and Tobago, paras. 339–49 (LOS Convention Annex VII Arb. Trib. April 11, 2006), at <http://www.pca-cpa.org.

3 Citing in support Maurice, Mendelson, On the Quasi-Normative Effect of Maritime Boundary Agreements, in Liber Amicorum Judge Shigeru Oda 177 (Nisuke, Andro, Edward, McWhinney, & Rüdiger, Wolfrum eds., 2002).Google Scholar

4 The obligation to find an equitable solution is one of result; Article 83 of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea requires that delimitation be effected “on the basis of international law, as referred to in Article 38 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice, in order to achieve an equitable solution.”

5 Eritrea v. Yemen, Second Stage, Maritime Delimination, para. 86 (Perm. Ct. Arb. Dec. 17, 1999), 40 ILM 983 (2001), at <http://www.pca-cpa.org.

6 88 AJIL 179, 179 (1994).