Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T10:51:17.271Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

International Lawlessness in Grenada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Francis A. Boyle
Affiliation:
University of Illinois in Champaign
Abram Chayes
Affiliation:
Harvard Law School
Isaak Dore
Affiliation:
St. Louis University
Richard Falk
Affiliation:
Princeton University
Martin Feinrider
Affiliation:
Nova Law Center
C. Clyde Ferguson Jr.
Affiliation:
Harvard Law School
J. David Fine
Affiliation:
Loyola University in New Orleans
Keith Nunes
Affiliation:
Loyola University in New Orleans
Burns Weston
Affiliation:
University of Iowa

Extract

The Reagan administration’s arguments purporting to justify the invasion of Grenada under international law must not be allowed to inveigle the American people into supporting this violent intervention into the domestic affairs of another independent state. Throughout the 20th century, the U.S. Government has routinely concocted evanescent threats to the lives and property of U.S. nationals as pretexts to justify armed interventions into sister American states. The transparency of these pretexts was just as obvious then as it is now. The Reagan administration has not established by means of clear and convincing evidence that there did in fact exist an immediate threat to the safety of U.S. citizens in Grenada. Even then, such a threat could have justified only a limited military operation along the lines of the Israeli raid at Entebbe for the sole purpose of evacuating the major concentration of U.S. nationals at the medical college.

Type
The United States Action in Grenada
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)