Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:56:05.502Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Institute of International Law at Bath, 1950

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2017

Charles Cheney Hyde
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Current Notes
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 45 , Issue 2 , April 1951 , pp. 344 - 347
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1951

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 At the Session of the Institute at Brussels in 1948, 27 members and 10 associates were in attendance. See Annuaire, 1948, p. 106.

2 The French attendants at Bath were the most numerous from any single country, being 9 in number.

3 The Secretary General’s Report to his colleagues was under date of Oct. 26, 1950.

4 Yet the following statement from the Secretary General in his Report of Oct. 26, 1950, should be noted: “ It was impossible, chiefly because of time, to discuss generally as one would have wished, other reports, for example that of our eminent colleague M.de La Pradelle on The International Effects of Nationalization. But the Bureau didnot show itself indifferent towards the desires of many of the rapporteurs and of membersof Commissions to have their reports discussed. It convoked two enlarged commissions,that is to say, permitting allthe confrères, even those who were not members of theCommission in question, to take part in this work. And so the Commissions of Mr.Lauterpacht on The Interpretation of Treaties and of Mr. Eousseau on The Determinationof Affairs Essentially Eelevant to theNational Competence of States,each had anevening meeting, and the rapporteurs noted some very interesting suggestions on thepart of the participants. Other Commissions, such as that of Mr. MakarovonTheChange of Territories and their Effects on Particular Laws, and those of Messrs.Batiffol and Valladāo on The Consequences of the Difference of Nationality of Spouseson the Effects of Marriage and the Conditions of Divorce had meetings convoked by therapporteurs, but participation was confined to the membership of the Commission And so the Session at Bath not only permitted the adoption of resolutions on 3 reports, but it also furnished the occasions on which there were very fruitful exchanges of ideas on other questions.”

5 Supplement to this JOURNAL, p. 15.

6 See Advisory Opinion of March 3, 1950, concerning Competence of the General Assembly for the Admission of a State to the United Nations, I.C.J. Reports, 1950, p. 8.