Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T10:44:24.169Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Incursions into Mexico and the Doctrine of Hot Pursuit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2017

Amos S. Hershey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial Comment
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , July 1919 , pp. 557 - 569
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1919

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For discussions of this incident, see editorials in this Journal, Vol. X, pp. 337 ff, and Vol. XI, pp. 399 f.

2 See I Malloy, pp. 1144–45. For other agreements with Mexico relating to this subject, see Ibid., 1157, 1158, 1162, 1170, 1171 and 1177.

For the correspondence pertaining to these matters, see II Moore’s Digest, pp. 418 ff; I Wharton’s Digest, pp. 229 ff. For further information as to Indian raids into Mexico and Canada, see II Moore, pp. 434 ff.

3 International Law, Pt. I, 2d ed., p. 313. For the case of the Caroline, see especially II Moore’s Digest, § 217, pp. 409 ff. See also III Moore’s International Arbitrations, 2419 ff; General Scott, Autobiography, I, pp. 305–317; Hall, 7th ed., pp. 323–4; Hershey, Essentials, p. 145 n.; Lawrence, 5th ed., Principles, § 229, p. 610; Snow, Cases, pp. 177–8; and I Westlake, pp. 313–14.

4 Le droit intentional codifié, 3d ed., Art. 342.

5 Principes, I, p. 151.

6 See Art. 8, p. 33, 13 Annuaire.

7 Nationality, Vol. II, p. 35–40.

8 These citations are from the head-notes to this case.

9 International Code, 2d ed., art. 626, pp. 426–7.

10 Commentaries, 3d ed., Vol. I, p. 276.

11 Law of Nations . . . in Time of Peace, § 190.

12 See also Dana’s note 108 to Wheaton, 8th ed., § 179, pp. 259–60, and I Moore, Digest, § 151, p. 729.

13 For this version of the facts of the case, see the South American Steamship Co. v. United States, in United States and Chilean Claims Commission, Vol. I, No. 18, passim. For the violations of neutrality of which the Itata had been guilty, see U. S. v. Trumbull (1891), 48 Fed. Rep. 99, and Scott, 731.

14 III Moore’s International Arbitrations, p. 3070.

15 See United States and Chilean Claims Commission (1901), Decision No. 21, pp. 209 ff.