Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:18:32.577Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Impact of International Law on International Cooperation: Theoretical Perspectives. Edited by Eyal Benvenisti and Moshe Hirsch. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004. Pp. xiii, 316. Index. $95, £60.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Laurence R. Helfer
Laurence R. Helfer*
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University Law School
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Recent Books on International Law
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 101 , Issue 1 , January 2007 , pp. 257 - 259
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Kenneth W., Abbott, Modern International Relations Theory: A Prospectus for International Lawyers, 14 Yale J. Int’l L. 335 (1989)Google Scholar.

2 Anne–Marie, Slaughter Burley, International Law and International Relations Theory: A Dual Agenda, 87 AJIL 205 (1993)Google Scholar.

3 E.g., José E., Alvarez, International Organizations as Law–Makers (2005)Google Scholar; Michael, Barnett & Martha, Finnemore, Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics (2004)Google Scholar; Laurence R., Heifer, Understanding Change in International Organizations: Globalization and Innovation in the ILO, 59 Vand. L. Rev. 649 (2006)Google Scholar; Barbara, Koremenos, Charles, Lipson, and Duncan, Snidal, The Rational Design of International Institutions, 55 Int’l Org. 761 (2001)Google Scholar.

4 E.g., Andrew T., Guzman, The Cost of Credibility: Explaining Resistance to Interstate Dispute Resolution Mechanisms, 31 J. Legal Stud. 303 (2002)Google Scholar; Laurence R., Heifer & Anne–Marie, Slaughter, Why States Create International Tribunals: A Response to Professors Posner and Yoo, 93 Cal. L. Rev. 899 (2005)Google Scholar; Eric A., Posner & John C., Yoo, Judicial Independence in International Tribunals, 93 Cal. L. Rev. 1 (2005)Google Scholar; Robert E., Scott & Paul B., Stephan, Contract Theory and the Enforcement of International Law (2006)Google Scholar.

5 E.g., Beth A., Simmons, Capacity, Commitment, and Compliance: International Institutions and Territorial Disputes, 46 J. Conflict Res. 829 (2002)Google Scholar. Compare Oona A., Hathaway, Do Human Rights Treaties Make a Difference? 111 Yale L.J. 1935 (2002)Google Scholar and Ryan, Goodman & Derek, Jinks, Measuring the Effects of Human Rights Treaties, 14 Eur. J. Int’l L. 171 (2003)Google Scholar.

6 Laurence R., Heifer, Exiting Treaties, 91 Va. L. Rev. 1579 (2005)Google Scholar; Peter, Rosendorff & Helen V., Milner, The Optimal Design of International Trade Institutions: Uncertainty and Escape, 55 Int’l Org. 829 (2001)Google Scholar; Edward T., Swaine, Unsigning, 55 Stan. L. Rev. 2061 (2003)Google Scholar.

7 E.g., Scott, Barrett, Environment and Statecraft: The Strategy of Environmental Treaty–Making (2003)Google Scholar; Ryan, Goodman & Derek, Jinks, How to Influence States: Socialization and International Human Rights Law, 54 Duke L.J. 621 (2004)Google Scholar.

8 E.g., Edward T., Swaine, Reserving, 31 Yale J. Int’l L. 307 (2006)Google Scholar; see also Laurence R., Heifer, Not Fully Committed? Reservations, Risk, and Treaty Design, 31 Yale J. Int’l L. 367 (2006)Google Scholar.

9 E.g., Barbara, Koremenos, Contracting Around International Uncertainty, 99 Am. Pol. Sci. Rev. 549 (2005)Google Scholar.

10 E.g., Kal, Raustiala, Form and Substance in InternationalAgreements, 99 AJIL 581 (2005)Google Scholar; Andrew T., Guzman, The Design of International Agreements, 16 Eur. J. Int’l L. 579 (2005)Google Scholar.

11 Kenneth W., Abbott, Robert O., Keohane, Andrew, Moravcsik, Anne–Marie, Slaughter, & Duncan, Snidal, The Concept of legalization, 54 Int’l Org. 401 (2000)Google Scholar.

12 George W., Downs & Michael A., Jones, Reputation, Compliance, and International law, 31 J. Legal. Stud. 95 (2002)Google Scholar.