Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T20:09:31.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Holden v. Commonwealth of Australia. 369 F.Supp. 1258

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2017

Alona E. Evans
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial Decisions
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 68 , Issue 4 , October 1974 , pp. 742
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 369 F.Supp. 1258, 1259.

1 369 F.Supp. 1258, 1259.

1 See, e.g., Re Griffiths, 413 U.S. 717 (1973) (admission to bar), 68 AJIL 334 (1974); Sugarman v. Dougall, 413 U.S. 634 (1973) (state civil service employment), 68 AJIL 335 (1974).

2 Defendants Paul Schlitz and the United States, while contending that the “compelling interest” test has evolved under the Fourteenth Amendment as a limitation on state rather than federal action, maintain that the federal statute [28 U.S.C. §1865] “would fully withstand scrutiny” under such a test were it deemed applicable to the federal government. (Footnote by court; other footnotes omitted).

3 370 F.Supp. 134, 136, 138.