Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T05:13:39.229Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hague Academie, Recueil des Cours, 1972. 3 Vols. (Vols, 135, 136, and 137 of the collection). Leiden: Sijthoff. I, 1973, pp. 522; II, 1973, pp. 591; III, 1974, pp. 938.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2017

Alfred P. Rubin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews and Notes
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 69 , Issue 2 , April 1975 , pp. 440 - 446
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Waldock, , General Course on Public International Law, 106 Hague Recueil (1962, II) 1 at p. 39 Google Scholar.

2 Of course, the work of the Special Committee was in fact successfully concluded on April 12, 1974. See 13 ILM 710 (1974); see also Official Documents section infra p. 480. Most if not all of Professor Schwebel’s concerns about the limited purposes and imprecision of viable definitions of aggression remain valid.

3 Resolution 2526 (XXV), October 24, 1970; reproduced in 65 AJIL 243 (1971).

4 299 UNTS 57.

5 Another participant in the negotiation of the Declaration in its final form concluded that the factors prompting the codification of principles “ranged from nobility of purpose to a desire to engage in propaganda and included a felt need on the part of some who had not been present at San Francisco in 1945 to put their views on record. There was in addition a simple desire on the part of some to provide work for what was at the time an under-employed Legal Committee.” Rosenstock, , The Declaration of Principles of International Law Concerning Friendly Relations: A Survey, 65 AJIL 713 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. It is not really clear just where Mr. Rosenstock and Professor Šahović would disagree, if at all.