Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-gr6zb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-20T00:47:46.112Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

First National City Bank v. Banco Para el Comercio Exterior de Cuba. 103 S.Ct. 2591

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial Decisions
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 78 , Issue 1 , January 1984 , pp. 230 - 232
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Shortly after BANCEC was dissolved, the parties filed a stipulation agreeing to the substitution of the Republic of Cuba as plaintiff. The district court approved the stipulation; however, no amended complaint was filed, and apparently for this reason BANCEC remained as the nominal plaintiff. The case lay dormant until 1975, when BANCEC filed a motion for substitution of Cubazucar, a Cuban state trading company, as plaintiff. Citibank opposed the motion, and the district court denied it on the ground that such a substitution would unnecessarily multiply the complications in the already complicated litigation.

2 505 F. Supp. 412, 428 (S.D.N.Y. 1980).

3 658 F.2d 913, 920 (2d Cir. 1981).

4 103 S. Ct. 2591, 2597 (citing 28 U.S.C. §1606).

5 Id. at 2603 (relying on National City Bank v. Republic of China, 348 U.S. 356, 361–62 (1955)).

6 103 S. Ct. at 2603.

7 Id. at 2603–04.

8 Separate Opinion, id. at 2605 n.2.