Article contents
The Final Outcome of the Fisheries Arbitration
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 May 2017
Extract
On the 15th of November, 1912, the United States and Great Britain formally ratified and put into effect an agreement which, in consequence of diplomatic negotiations covering nearly two years, had been signed by their plenipotentiaries on the 20th of July, 1912, adopting with certain modifications the rules and method of procedure embodied in the award of the North Atlantic Coast Fisheries Arbitration Tribunal, rendered at The Hague on September 7, 1910, under which all questions hereafter arising in regard to the exercise of American fishing liberties under the treaty of 1818 may be determined in accordance with the principles laid down in the award. This agreement constitutes the final step which was necessary to complete and perfect the arbitration award and give it practical application; and the award and this agreement together establish for all time the extent of the rights and obligations of the inhabitants of the United States in the exercise of thenfishing liberties under the treaty of 1818.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 1913
References
1 This agreement is printed in the Supplement to this Journal, page 41.
2 Mr.H., Lammasch Google Scholar, Doctor of Law, Professor of the University of Vienna, Aulic Councillor,Member of the Upper House of the Austrian Parliament; His Excellency Jonkheer A. F., de Savornin Lohman Google Scholar, Doctor of Law, Minister of State, former Minister of the Interior, Member of the Second Chamber of the Netherlands; Honorable George, Gray Google Scholar, Doctor of Law, formerly United States Senator, Judge of the United States Circuit Court of Appeals; The Right Honorable SirCharles, Fitzpatrick Google Scholar Doctor of Law, Chief Justice of Canada; Honorable Luis Maria, Drago, Doctor of Law, former Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Argentine Republic, Member of the Law Academy of the University of Buenos AiresGoogle Scholar.
3 Honorable Chandler P., Anderson Google Scholar, Agent for the United States; The Honorable Allen B., Aylesworth, Minister of Justice of Canada, Agent for Great BritainGoogle Scholar.
4 Counsel for the United States: Honorable Elihu, Root Google Scholar, Honorable George, Turner Google Scholar, Honorable Samuel J., Elder Google Scholar, Charles B., Warren Google Scholar, Esquire, James Brown, Scott Google Scholar, Esquire, and Robert, Lansing Google Scholar, Esquire.
Counsel for Great Britain: The Right Honorable SirWilliam Snowdpn, Robson Google Scholar, Attorney General of Great Britain; The Right Honorable SirRobert Bannatyne, Finlay Google Scholar, former Attorney General for Great Britain; The Honorable SirEdward P., Morris Google Scholar, Prime Minister of Newfoundland; The Honorable Donald, Morrison Google Scholar, Minister of Justice of Newfoundland; SirJames S., Winter Google Scholar, former Attorney General of Newfoundland; Mr.John S., Ewart Google Scholar, Mr.George F., Shepley Google Scholar, SirH. Erie, Richards Google Scholar, Mr.A.F., Peterson Google Scholar, Mr.W. N., Tilley Google Scholar, Mr.Raymond, Asquith Google Scholar, Mr.Geoffrey, Lawrence Google Scholar, Mr.Hamar, Greenwood Google Scholar, Messrs., Blake Google Scholar and Redden, Google Scholar, Mr.H. E., Dale Google Scholar.
- 1
- Cited by