Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:15:32.955Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Dumbarton Oaks Proposals Viewed Against Recent Experience in International Organization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2017

P. B. P.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial Comment
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , January 1945 , pp. 103 - 107
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1945

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Green, J. F., “The Dumbarton Oaks Conversations,” in Department of State Bulletin , Vol. XI, No. 278 (October 22, 1944), pp. 459, 465.Google Scholar

2 Dumbarton Oaks Proposals, Chap. VI, Sec. C, and Chap. XII, Note.

3 Though plans are to be drafted for possible adoption. Proposals, Chap. V, Sec. B, par. 1, and Chap. VI, Sec. B, par. 5.

4 The New York Times, February 15, 1919, pp. 1, 2.

5 Proposals, Chap. I.

6 International Commodity Control Agreements, published by the International Labor Office, Montreal, 1943.

7 Compare Covenant of the League of Nations, Art. VI, par. 1, with Proposals, Chap. X, par. 1, and Covenant Art. 21, with Proposals, Chap. VIII, Sec. C, par. 1.

8 Preamble and Proposals, Chap. XII, par. 2.

9 Chap. III.

10 Chap. II, par. 6 (2).

11 Chap. II, par. 1; neither principle is so much as mentioned in the Covenant.

12 Chap. VIII, Sec. A, par. 3, and Sec. B, par. 3; Chap. XI.

13 See Chap. V, Sec. B, pars. 2, 4.

14 Same, pars. 4, 5, and Sec. C, par. 2.

15 Chap. VIII, Sec. B, par. 9 and Sec. C, par. 1.

16 Same, Sec. A; for an effort to spell out the implications of this Section see article by Kelsen, above, p. 58.

17 Proposals, Chap. VIII, Sec. A, par. 6.

18 Chap. VII.

19 Same, Sec. A, par. 4; the reference in par. 2 is clearly not a submission to jurisdiction.

20 Same, par. 7.

21 Chap. IX and Chap. V, Sec. B, pars. 6 and 7, respectively; see study by this writer, The League and Other International Organization, Geneva Research Centre, Geneva, 1934.

22 Chap. IX, Sec. A, par. 1, and Sec. C, especially pars. 1 (a) and (e)-(g).

23 Chap. XI.

24 Chap. II, pars. 2-6; Chap. VIII, Sec. A, par. 3, and Sec. B, par. 5; Chap. IX; etc.