Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T06:40:43.148Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Denial of Justice in International Law. By Jan Paulsson. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005. Pp. xxvi, 279. Index. $90, £50.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

John R. Crook
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Recent Books on International Law
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 100 , Issue 3 , July 2006 , pp. 742 - 746
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Award, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/98/3 (NAFTA Ch. 11 Arb. Trib. June 26, 2003), 42 ILM 811 (2003) (discussed in case report by William S. Dodge at 98 AJIL 155 (2004)). All of the NAFTA cases discussed in this review are available online at <http://www.naftalaw.org>.

2 Award, ICSID Case ARB(AF)/99/2 (NAFTA Ch. 11 Arb. Trib. Oct. 11, 2002), 42 ILM 85 (2003) (discussed in case report by William S. Dodge at 98 AJIL 155 (2004)).

3 See Gerald, Fitzmaurice, The Meaning of the Term “Denial of Justice,” 1932 Brit. Y.B Int’l L. 93, 95 Google Scholar.

4 Alwyn, V. Freeman, The International Responsibility of States Fordenial of Justice 497–530 (1938)Google Scholar.

5 See, e.g., Stephan, Verosta, Denial of Justice, in Encyclopedia of Public International Law 96–97 Google Scholar ( Rudolf, Bernhardt ed., Installment 10, 1987) (“A denial of justice . . . should be understood as any defect in the organization of courts or in the organization of justice which entails a violation of the international legal duties of States with respect to the judicial protection of aliens.”)Google Scholar.

6 See, e.g., Chattin Claim (U.S. v. Mex.), 4 R.I.A.A. 282 (1927) (numerous deficiencies in claimant’s “show trial”).

7 Verosta, supra note 5, at 98 (emphasis added).

8 Final Award on Jurisdiction and Merits (NAFTA Ch. 11 Arb. Trib. Aug. 3, 2005), 44 ILM 1343 (2005). A case report on this arbitration appears in this issue of the Journal at 100 AJIL 683 (2006).