No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 March 2017
1 Military Commissions Act of 2006, Pub. L. No. 109-366, 120 Stat. 2600 (Oct. 17, 2006); see John, R. Crook, Contemporary Practice of the United States, 101 AJIL 185 (2007).Google Scholar
2 Boumediene v. Bush, No. 05-5065 (D.C. Cir. Feb. 20, 2007), at <http://pacer.cadc.uscourts.gov/docs/common/opinions/200702/05-5062b.pdf=;see Stephen, Labaton, Court Endorses Curbs on Appeal by U.S. Detainees, N.Y. Times, Feb. 21, 2007, at A1 Google Scholar; Josh, White, Guantanamo Detainees Lose Appeal, Wash. Post, Feb. 21, 2007, at A1.Google Scholar
3 Art. I, §9, cl. 2 of the U.S. Constitution provides that “ [t]he privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.”
4 Detainees Seek Justices’ Ruling on Challenges in U.S. Courts, Wash. Post, Mar. 6, 2007, at A4; Linda, Greenhouse, Justices Weigh Opening New Phase on Guantanamo, N.Y. Times, Mar. 30, 2007, at A21.Google Scholar
5 Linda, Greenhouse, Supreme Court Turns Down Detainees’ Habeas Corpus Case, N.Y. Times, Apr. 3, 2007, at A14.Google Scholar
6 See Fix Needed, Editorial, Wash. Post, Dec. 21, 2006, at A28 Google ScholarPubMed; American Liberty at the Precipice, Editorial, N.Y. Times, Feb. 22, 2007, at A22 Google Scholar; Jeffrey, H. Smith, A War Under Law, Wash. Post, Feb. 22, 2007, at A18 Google Scholar; A Congressional Duty, Editorial, Wash. Post, Feb. 23, 2007, at A18.Google Scholar
7 Carol, D. Leonnig & Julie, Tate, Some at Guantanamo Mark 5 Years in Limbo, Wash. Post, Jan. 16, 2007, at A1.Google Scholar
8 Con, Coughlin, No Release for Guantanamo Detainees, Telegraph.Co.Uk, Dec. 15, 2006, at <http://www.telegraph.co.uWnews/main.jhtml;jsessionid=RDS5X2TPATVDBQFIQMGCFGGAVCBQUIV0?xml=/news/2006/12/15/wguanl5.xml=Google Scholar.