Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T23:55:57.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to Contemporary Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2017

John M. Leddy  and
Dean Busk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 61 , Issue 1 , January 1967 , pp. 101 - 115
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 By reference to the PCIJ. (References to the ICJ in place of the PCIJ in these cases is provided for by Article 37 of the Statute of the ICJ.)

2 Appeals procedure from decision of the Council permits reference to the PCIJ (ICJ) if parties to dispute have accepted the Statute of the PCIJ (ICJ)..

3 Reference to the ICJ is subject to consent, in each case, of all parties to the dispute.

4 In addition, the United States concluded economic co-operation and aid agreements with 17 countries in 1948 which contain provisions for referral of disputes to the International Court of Justice subject, however, to the self-judging domestic jurisdiction reservation of the United States.

5 By note dated March 22, 1960 (acknowledged by the United States on March 31, 1960), the Dominican Republic gave notice of its intention to terminate the 1957 agreement (TIAS 3780) at the expiration of the ten-year period fixed by its terms: effective March 19, 1967.