Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T06:20:10.479Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bonser v. La Macchia. 43 Austl. L.J.R. 2751

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2017

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial Decisions
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

[1969] I.CJ. Rep. 3.

References

* Reported by L. F. E. Goldie, Professor of Law, Loyola University of Los Angeles, Visiting Scholar, Columbia University

2 Agreement Relating to the Exploration for, and the Exploitation of, the Petroleum Resources, and certain other Resources, of the Continental Shelf of Australia and of certain Territories of the Commonwealth and of certain other Submerged Land, signed Oct. 16, 1967. The final section, §26, averred that “[t]he Governments acknowledge that this Agreement is not intended to create legal relationships justiciable in a Court of Law… ,“ This agreement was implemented by a “legislative scheme,” namely, reciprocal legislation by the Parliaments of the Commonwealth and the States. The Commonwealth enactments were: Petroleum (Submerged Lands) Act, No. 118, 1967; Petroleum (Submerged Lands) (Royalty) Act, No. 119, 1967; Petroleum (Submerged Lands) (Exploration Permit Fees) Act. No. 120, 1967; Petroleum (Submerged Lands) (Production License Fees) Act, No. 121, 1967; Petroleum (Submerged Lands) (Pipeline License Fees) Act, No. 122, 1967; Petroleum (Submerged Lands) (Registration Fees) Act, No. 123, 1967; and Petroleum (Ashmore and Cartier Islands) Act, No. 124, 1967. All these statutes became law on Nov. 22, 1967.

3 Aust'l. Const. §51(x).

4 Opinion of Barwick, C.J., at pp. 277-278.

5 Ibid, at p. 278. These cases would appear to be those cited ibid, at p. 279 and are: Fitzhardinge (Lord) v.Purcell, [1908] 2 Ch. 139; Lord Advocate v.Clyde Navigation Trustees, 19 Rett. 174 (1891); Lord Advocate v.Wemyss, [1900] A.C. 48 (H.L.); Secretary of State for India v.Chelikani Rama Rao, 85 L.J.P.C. 222 (1916).

6 Ibid. at pp. 278-279.

7 Ibid.at p. 283

8 Opinion of Kitto, J., at pp. 287-288.

9 Opinion of Menzies, J., at p. 289. Owen, J., made a similar point. See p. 299.

10 Opinion of Windeyer, J., at p. 290.

11 Ibid, at p. 293.

12 Ibid.

13 Ibid. at p. 294.

14 Ibid.