Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T11:57:03.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Albericus Gentilis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2017

Extract

Modern international law is generally regarded as beginning with the Peace of Westphalia in 1648. But it is necessary to go much further back in the history of the world for the beginnings of the law governing the intercourse of nations. The Greek states had a rudimentary inter-state law that regulated their relations. Thus they practiced arbitration in a way among themselves: they recognized the sanctity of the person of heralds, and they followed other recognized customs in their dealings one with another. When Rome and Carthage and other nations were struggling for the mastery of the world, the beginnings of a law of nations were recognized and practiced between them. Upon, however, practically all the known world coming under the sway of imperial Rome, all possibility as well as need of a law of nations was wanting, and as a result the faltering beginnings of an international law as recognized among the Greek states and then by the Powers surrounding the Mediterranean, were extinguished by the extension of the Pax Romana to all the known world.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1911

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Wheaton, Henry: History of the Law of Nations in Europe and America, New York, 1845, p. 69 Google Scholar; Calvo, Charles: Le Droit International Théorique et Pratique, cinquième edition, Paris, 1896, Vol. I, p. 35 Google Scholar; Westlake, John: International Law, Cambridge, England, 1904, Vol. I, p. 44 Google Scholar; Scott, James Brown: The Hague Peace Conferences of 1899 and 1907, Baltimore, 1909, Vol. I, p. 12 Google Scholar.

2 Maine, Henry Sumner: International Law, New York, 1888, pp. 15-16, 27Google Scholar et seq.; Nys, Ernest: Les Origines du Droit International, Brussels, 1894 Google Scholar; Oppenheim, Lassa: International Law, London, 1905, Vol. I, pp. 44-57 Google Scholar; Schucking, Walther: “L’Organisation Internationale,” Revue Générale de Droit International Public, Paris, 1908, p. 5 Google Scholar et seg.

3 Balch, Thomas Willing: L’Evolution de l’Arbitrage International, Philadelphia, 1908, p. 12 Google Scholar.

4 Wheaton, Henry: History of the Law of Nations, New York, 1845, p. 3 Google Scholar.

5 Calvo, Charles: Le Droit International Théorique et Pratique, cinquième édition, Paris, 1896, Vol. 1, p. 4 Google Scholar.

6 Crucé, Émeric: Le Nouveau Cynée, Paris, 1623 Google Scholar, Réimpression du texte original de 1623 avec introduction et traduction anglaise par Thomas Willing Balch, Philadelphia, Allen, Lane and Scott, 1909, p. 146 [229]; Lawrence, T. J.: Principles of International Law, Boston, 1900, p. 36 Google Scholar.

7 Française, Anatole France de l’Académie: Vie de Jeanne d’Arc, Paris, 1908, pp. 19, 95, 115Google Scholar.

8 Ward, Robert: An Enquiry into the Foundation and History of the Law of Nations in Europe from the time of the Greeks and Romans to the Age of Grotius, Dublin, 1795, Vol. II, pp. 149 and 151Google Scholar; SirMaine, Henry Sumner: Early Law and Custom, London, 1883, p. 158 Google Scholar.

9 Guizot, F. P. G.: L’Histoire de France, Paris, Vols. II and IIIGoogle Scholar; Ploetz, Carl: Epitome of Ancient Mediaeval and Modern History, Boston, 1884, pp. 318-319 Google Scholar.

10 Oppenheim, L.: International Law, London, 1905, Vol. I, p. 54 Google Scholar.

11 Nys, Ernest: Notes pour servir à l’Histoire Littéraire et Dogmatique du Droit International en Angleterre, Première Partie, Brussels, 1888, pp. 129-132 Google Scholar; Walker, Thomas Alfred: A History of the Law of Nations, Cambridge University Press, 1899, Vol. I, pp. 132, 189Google Scholar.

12 Maine, Henry Sumner: Ancient Law, London, 1861, p. 110 Google Scholar; Bryee, James: The Holy Roman Empire, London, 1889, p. 326 Google Scholar et seq.

13 Holland, Thoraas Erskine: Studies in International Law, Oxford, 1898, p. 1 Google Scholar et seq.; Agabiti, Ennio: Alberico Gentili fondatore della scienza del Diritto Internazionale, Fermo, 1908 Google Scholar; Rava, Luigi: Gentili, Alberico: discorso pronunciato ali inaugurazione del monumento in Sanginesio (26 Settembre, 1908), Rome, 1908 Google Scholar; Per Alberico Gentili nel III centenario della sua morte, Numero Unico a cura del Comitato compilato da Nada Peretti e Giacomo Ferroni, Rome, 1908.

14 Fiore, Pasquale: Nouveau Droit International Public (translated from the Italian by Charles Antoine), Paris, 1885, Vol. III, pp. 160-162 Google Scholar; Holland, Thomas Erskine: Studies in International Law, Oxford, 1898, p. 58 Google Scholar.

15 Holland, Thomas Erskine: Alberico Gentilis, a lecture first delivered at All Souls College, Oxford, November 7th, 1874 Google Scholar, reprinted in Studies in International Law, Oxford, 1898, pp. 1-39. It was this lecture of Professor Holland in which be fortified his statements with a wealth of references to manuscripts and old books, that aroused new interest in the work of the Italo-English international jurist which resulted in marked honor being paid to his memory, first in the country of his adoption and afterwards in that of his birth.

16 Alberici Gentilis, I. C. D., I. C., Professons Regii, De Iure Belli Libri Tres, editit Holland, Thomas Erskine, I. C. D., Juris Gentium Professor Chicheleianus, Oxford, 1877, p. VIII Google Scholar.

17 As a result of this case, Hotman published at Paris in 1602, “Traité des devoirs de l’ambassadeur.” He was a son of the distinguished French jurist, Francis Hotman.

18 Milite, Edward Coke: The Fourth part of the Institutes of the Laws of England: concerning the Jurisdiction of Courts, the Sixth Edition, London, 1681, Chap. XXVI, p. 152 Google Scholar: “And in the Bishop of Rosse’s case, Ann. 13 Eliz., the question being An legátus, qui rebellionem contra principem ad quem legatus concitat, legati privilegiis gaudeat, & non ut hostie poenis subjaceat. And it was resolved that he had lost the privilege of an Ambassador, and was subject to punishment.”

19 Gentilis, Alberici I. C. D., I. C. Professons Regii, De Iure Belli Libri Tres, editit Holland, Thomas Erskine, Oxford, 1877, p. XVII Google Scholar.

20 Alberici Gentilis I. C. Professons Regii, De IVRE Belli, Libri III. Nunc primum in lucem editi. Ad illvstrissimvm Comitem Essexise. Hanoviae, apud Hoeredes Guilielmi Antonii. MDCXII. (Copy in the Library of the University of Pennsylvania.)

21 Holland, Thomas Erskine: Studies in International Law, Oxford, 1898, pp. 54-55 Google Scholar.

22 De Iure Belli: Book I, p. 17.

23 De Iure Belli : Book I, p. 38.

24 De Iure Belli : Book I, p. 124.

25 Walker, Thomas Alfred: A history of the Law of Nations, Cambridge, 1899, Vol. I, p. 161 Google Scholar.

26 De lure Belli: Book I, p. 146.

27 De Iure Belli: Book I, p. 164.

28 Calvo, Charles: Le Droit International Théorique et Pratique, Paris, 1896, Vol. V, p. 3.Google Scholar

29 De Iure Belli: Book II, p. 228.

30 De Iure Belli: Book II, p. 427.

31 Wostlake, John: International Law, Cambridge University Press, 1907, Vol. II, p. 169 Google Scholar et seq.

32 Nys, Ernest: Etudes de Droit International et de Droit Politique, Brussels, 1901, p. 73 Google Scholar.

34 De Iure Belli: Book II, p. 351.

35 Ibid, p. 409.

35 Dodge, T. A.: Gustavus Adolphus, New York, 1895, Vol. I, p. 321 Google Scholar. To Munich, Gustavus said: “I could inflict on you the penalties of Magdeburg — but fear not, my word is woith more than your capitulation papers.”