Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:34:54.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Statistical analysis of pesttolerant crop response with reference to corn weed control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

Fang Du ,
Bernard J. Morzuch ,
L. Joe Moffitt  and
Prasanta C. Bhowmik
Fang Du
Affiliation:
Assistant Vice-President/Senior Analyst, Department of Portfolio Management, Fleet Financial Group, Providence, RI;
Bernard J. Morzuch
Affiliation:
Professors, Department of Resource Economics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003-2040.
L. Joe Moffitt*
Affiliation:
Professors, Department of Resource Economics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003-2040.
Prasanta C. Bhowmik
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003-2040.
*
L.J. Moffitt is corresponding author ([email protected]).
Get access

Abstract

A statistical model of crop-weed competition is developed to permit, but not require, the existence of crop tolerance of weed pests. The popular rectangular hyperbolic model of crop-weed competition is shown to be a special case of the more comprehensive model. Application of the model to corn weed control in Massachusetts demonstrates its practicality and detects evidence of pest-tolerant crop response in this crop-weed system.

Keywords

agroeconomic responseenvironmental perspectivestatistical modeling
Type
Articles
Information
American Journal of Alternative Agriculture , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , September 2000 , pp. 137 - 141
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Auld, B.A., and Tisdell, C.A.. 1987. Economic thresholds and response to uncertainty in weed control. Agric. Syst. 25:219–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Barrett, M.R., Williams, W.M., and Wells, D.. 1993. Use of ground water monitoring data for pesticide regulation. Weed Technol. 7:238–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Bell, C.E. 1995. Broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis) yield loss from Italian ryegrass (Lolium perenne) interference. Weed Sci. 43:117–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Bhowmik, P.C., and O'Toole, B.M.. 1992. Performance of reduced rates of herbicides with low and high residues in minimum-tillage corn. Mass. Weed Sci. Res. Results 11:37–42.Google Scholar
5.Bhowmik, P.C., and O'Toole, B.M.. 1993. Performance of reduced rates of herbicides with low and high residues in minimum-tillage corn. Mass. Weed Sci. Res. Results 12:27–31.Google Scholar
6.Cardina, J., Regnier, E., and Sparrow, D.. 1995. Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) competition and economic thresholds in conventional- and no-tillage corn (Zeamays). Weed Sci. 43:81–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Carlson, G.A. 1988. Economics of biological control of pests. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 3:110–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Chambers, R.G. 1988. Applied Production Analysis. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
9.Cousens, R. 1985. A simple model relating yield loss to weed density. Ann. Appl. Biol. 107:239–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Du, F. 1995. Production Function Estimation with Pest Tolerant Response. Ph.D. diss. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
11.Fernandez-Cornejo, J., and Jans, S.. 1999. Pest Management in U.S. Agriculture. Agric. Handbook 717. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
12.Flint, M.L., and van den Bosch, R.. 1981. Introduction to Integrated Pest Management. Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Hartley, M.J., and Mallela, P.. 1977. The asymptotic properties of a maximum likelihood estimator for a model of markets in disequilibrium. Econometrica 45:1205–1220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Kogan, M., and Luckmann, W.K.. 1974. Guidelines for a soybean insect-pest management program in Illinois. Illinois Natural History Survey, Economic Entomology Section; University of Illinois Agricultural Experiment Station, Ursbana.Google Scholar
15.Kwon, T.J., Young, D.L., Young, F.L., and Boerboom, C.M.. 1995. PALWEED: WHEAT: A bioeconomic decision model for postemergence weed management in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 43:595–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Limon-Ortega, A., Mason, S.C., and Martin, A.R.. 1998. Production practices improve grain sorghum and pearly millet competitiveness with weeds. Agron. J. 90:227–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Liu, W., Moffitt, L.J., Lee, L.K., and Bhowmik, P.C.. 1999. Publicly-provided information in environmental management: Incorporating groundwater quality goals into herbicide treatment recommendations. J. Environ. Manage. 55:239–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.McDonald, J.D., Moffitt, L.J., and Willis, C.E.. 1997. Application of mean-Gini stochastic efficiency analysis. Aust. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 41:45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Moffitt, L.J., Tanigoshi, L.K., and Baritelle, J.L.. 1983. Incorporating risk in comparison of alternative pest control methods. Environ. Entomol. 12:1003–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Poston, F.L., Pedigo, L.P., and Welch, S.M.. 1983. Economic injury levels: Reality and practicality. Bull. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 29:49–53.Google Scholar
21.Radosevich, S.R. and Holt, J.S.. 1984. Weed Ecology: Implications for Vegetation Management. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
22.Radosevich, S.R., Holt, J., and Ghersa, C.. 1997. Weed Ecology: Implications for Management. 2nd ed.Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
23.Radosevich, S.R., and Rousch, M.L.. 1990. The role of competition in agriculture. In Grace, J.B. and Tilman, D. (eds.). Perspectives on Plant Competition. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. p. 341–363.Google Scholar
24.Stoller, E.W., Wax, L.M., and Alm, D.M.. 1993. Survey results on environmental issues and weed science research priorities within the Corn Belt. Weed Technol. 7:763–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Swinton, S.M., Buhler, D.D., Forcella, F., Gunsolus, J.L., and King, R.P.. 1994. Estimation of crop yield loss due to interference by multiple weed species. Weed Sci. 42:103–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Wald, A. 1949. Note on the consistency of the maximum likelihood estimate. Ann. Math. Stat. 20:595–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.White, J.M., Allen, P.G., Moffitt, L.J., and Kingsley, P.P.. 1995. Economic analysis of an areawide program for biological control of the alfalfa weevil. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 10:173–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Wilson, R.G. 1993. Wild proso millet (Panicum miliaceum) interference in dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Weed Sci. 41:607–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar