Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:37:50.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Purslane as a living mulch in broccoli production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

D.R. Ellis ,
K. Guillard  and
R.G. Adams
D.R. Ellis*
Affiliation:
Associate Extension Educator, Department of Plant Science, University of Connecticut, Box U-4067, Storrs, CT 06269;
K. Guillard
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Plant Science, University of Connecticut, Box U-4067, Storrs, CT 06269;
R.G. Adams
Affiliation:
Professor and Assistant Director, Cooperative Extension System, University of Connecticut, Box U-4036, Storrs, CT 06269.
*
Corresponding author is D.R. Ellis ([email protected]).
Get access

Abstract

Many of the characteristics of common purslane that describe this species as a “weed” are also desirable traits for a living mulch. Common purslane was investigated as a living mulch in spring broccoli production in Connecticut and was compared with mechanical and chemical weed control, as well as black plastic mulch. Common purslane seed was broadcast prior to transplanting broccoli in late May 1993 and in early June 1994. Broccoli yields with the purslane living mulch were comparable to yields with conventional methods of weed management and with no reduction in crop quality. Common purslane living mulch was able to effectively compete with weeds in broccoli when between-row areas were kept relatively weed-free by hoeing or hand pulling during the first 2 weeks after broccoli transplanting. High levels of weed control and ground cover occurred when purslane became established between crop rows. Broccoli plants were tolerant of purslane living mulch and weeds up to a critical threshold level without a significant reduction in yield. Purslane living mulch established through periodic mechanical weed management was determined to be the most economical treatment in the study. While including purslane living mulch in a spring broccoli crop production system may be a novel approach to controlling weeds, the strategies involved in this system still rely on basic weed management principles.

Keywords

Brassica oleracea L.common purslanePortulaca oleracea L.weed control
Type
Articles
Information
American Journal of Alternative Agriculture , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , June 2000 , pp. 50 - 59
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Allison, F.E. 1973. Soil Organic Matter and its Role in Crop Production. Elsevier, New York.Google Scholar
2.Bartlett, M.S. 1937. Some examples of statistical methods of research in agriculture and applied biology. J. Royal Statist. Soc. Suppl. 4:137–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.DeGregorio, R.E., and Ashley, R.A.. 1985. Screening living mulches and cover crops for weed suppression in no till sweet corn. Proc. Northeastern Weed Sci. Soc. Ann. Meeting 39:80–84.Google Scholar
4.Finch, C.U., and Sharp, W.C.. 1983. Cover crops in California orchards and vineyards. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Davis, CA.Google Scholar
5.Fischer, A., and Burrill, L.. 1993. Managing interference in a sweet corn-white clover living mulch system. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 8:51–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Grossman, J. 1993. Fighting insects with living mulches. IPM Practitioner 15(10):1–8.Google Scholar
7.Grubinger, V.P., and Minotti, P.L.. 1990. Managing white clover living mulch for sweet corn production with partial rototilling. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 5:4–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Guillard, K. 1990. Cover crops for nursery and Christmas tree plantings. Connecticut Nursery Newsl. 2(2):4–7.Google Scholar
9.Gulick, S.H., Grimes, D.W., Munk, D.S., and Goldhamer, D.A.. 1994. Cover-cropenhanced water infiltration of a slowly permeable fine sandy loam. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 58:1539–1546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Hartwig, N.L. 1983. Crownvetch and notillage crop production for soil erosion control. File No. IVC 10M884 U.Ed. 844–777. Pennsylvania State University, Cooperative Extension System, State College.Google Scholar
11.Hofstetter, B. 1988. The New Farm's cover crop guide: 53 legumes, grasses and legume-grass mixes you can use to save soil and money. New Farm 10(1):17–22, 27–28, 30–31.Google Scholar
12.Hughes, B.J., and Sweet, R.D.. 1979. Living mulch: A preliminary report on grassy cover crops interplanted with vegetables. Proc. Northeastern Weed Sci. Soc. Ann. Meeting 33:109.Google Scholar
13.Jurchak, T. 1984. Improve your soil with living mulch. Amer. Veg. Grower 32(2):40–41.Google Scholar
11.Lanini, W.T., Pittenger, D.R., Graves, W.L., Munoz, F., and Agamalian, H.S.. 1989. Subclovers as living mulches for managing weeds in vegetables. California Agric. 43(6):25–27.Google Scholar
15.Lindgren, C.B., and Ashley, R.A.. 1986. No-till snap bean management system in a white clover sod. Proc. Northeastern Weed Sci. Soc. Ann. Meeting 40:93–97.Google Scholar
16.Merwin, I.A., and Stiles, W.C.. 1994. Orchard groundcover management impacts on apple tree growth and yield, and nutrient availability and uptake. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 119:209–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Miyanishi, K., and Cavers, P.B.. 1980. The biology of Canadian weeds. 40. Portulaca oleracea L. Can. J. Plant Sci. 60:953–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Miyanishi, K., and Cavers, P.B.. 1981. Effects of hoeing and rototilling on some aspects of the population dynamics of pure stands of Portulaca oleracea L. (purslane). Weed Res. 21(2):47–58.Google Scholar
19.Munawar, A., Blevins, R.L., Frye, W.W., and Saul, M.R.. 1990. Tillage and cover crop management for soil water conservation. Agron. J. 82:773–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Nicholson, A.G., and Wein, H.C.. 1983. Screening of turfgrasses and clovers for use as living mulches in sweet corn and cabbage. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 108:1071–1076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Paine, L.K., and Harrison, H.. 1993. The historical roots of living mulch and related practices. HortTechnol. 3(2):137–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Paine, L., Harrison, H., and Newenhouse, A.. 1995. Establishment of asparagus with living mulch. J. Prod. Agric. 8:35–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Pieters, A.J. 1927. Green Manuring: Principals and Practice. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
24.SAS Institute. 1995. SAS User's Guide: Statistics. Version 6 Edition. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.Google Scholar
25.Schonbeck, M., Herbert, S., DeGregorio, R., Mangan, F., Guillard, K., Sideman, E., Herbst, J., and Jaye, R.. 1993. Cover cropping systems for brassicas in the northeastern United States: 1. Cover crop and vegetable yields, nutrients and soil conditions. J. Sustainable Agric. 3(3/4):105–132.Google Scholar
26.Scott, T.W., and Burt, R.F.. 1985. Cover crops and intercrops for New York. Fact Sheet P.452.00. Cornell University Cooperative Extension, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
27.Stanley, D. 1991. More for less—A new way to grow tomatoes. Agric. Res. (Washington, DC) 39(10):14–15.Google Scholar
28.Vengris, J., Dunn, S., and Stacewicz-Sapuncakis, M.. 1972. Common purslane. Life History Studies as Related to Weed Control in the Northeast 7. Research Bulletin 598. University of Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station, Amherst.Google Scholar
29.Wagger, M.G., and Denton, H.P.. 1989. Influence of cover crop and wheel traffic on soil physical properties in continuous no-till corn. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 53:1206–1210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30.Wiggen, J. 1995. Vetch mulch fetches more veggies. Agric. Res. (Washington, DC) 43(5):10–11.Google Scholar
31.Zimdahl, R.L. 1980. Weed-Crop Competition: A Review. IPPC Document 31-A-80. Oregon State University, International Plant Protection Center, Corvallis.Google Scholar