Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T17:31:44.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Farmers' attitudes towards sustainable agriculture issues and environmental quality in a selected area of Bangladesh

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

M. Z. Rahman  and
H. Mikuni
M. Z. Rahman
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor in the Dept of Agric. Extension Education, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh.
H. Mikuni
Affiliation:
Professor and Dean, Faculty of Applied Biological Science, Hiroshima University, Higashi Hiroshima, Japan.
Get access

Abstract

The sustainability issues associated with agricultural development are a growing concern worldwide. This study focussed on farmers' attitudes about environmental degradation and long term productivity loss that may result from implementation of modern agricultural technologies. The study was conducted in a selected area of Bangladesh and field level data were collected from the sampled farmers through personal interviewing. Findings revealed that more than two-thirds of the farmers confronted either a medium or high level of environmental problems due to intensive cultivation. Their main concerns were stress on soil fertility, loss of essential aquatic life, and reduction of earthworms and other beneficial organisms in soil. The farmers' recommended solutions were production of high yielding crop varieties with conservation management practices, and the balanced use of chemical fertilizers and organic manures. To apply these techniques, the top expectation of the farmers was to receive subsidies for agricultural inputs, and get easy-term credit from the government or non-government organizations. Interestingly, just half the farmers in the study area possessed a less than favorable attitude towards sustainability issues of agricultural development. In other words, to them these issues were of low or marginal priority. Only 6% of them expressed a highly favorable attitude (high priority) and 44% expressed a moderate attitude. Based on correlations, the individual farmer's age, education, family size, organizational participation, television exposure, communication behavior and environmental problem confrontation were identified as the main determinants of their attitudes about sustainability issues. Hence, these factors should be considered when formulating programs and policies for agriculture development that aim for long-term sustainability.

Keywords

agricultural developmentenvironmental degradationproductivity loss
Type
Articles
Information
American Journal of Alternative Agriculture , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , March 1999 , pp. 22 - 29
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Andel, W. A. V. D., Hoque, M. S., Hossain, M. A. and Rahman, M. H.. 1996. In S. M. Farouk, and M. U. Salam (eds.). Sustainable Agriculture in Bangladesh: Addressing Issues Through Human Resource Development. J. Rural Development 26(1):1–10.Google Scholar
2.BARC-Bangladesh Agric. Research Council. 1989. Quoted in S. Parveen. 1993. Attitude of the rural women towards homestead agricultural production. M. S. Thesis, Dept. of Agric. Extension Education, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh.Google Scholar
3.BBS-Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics. 1995. Statistical Pocket Book. Ministry of Planning, The People's Republic of Bangladesh.Google Scholar
4.Conway, G.R. 1990. Agroecosystems. In Jones, J. G. W. and Street, P. R. (eds.). Systems Theory Applied to Agriculture and the Food Chain. Elsevier Applied Science, London.Google Scholar
5.Garrett, H. E., and Woodworth, R. S.. 1981. Statistics in Psychology and Education. Vakils, Feffer and Simsons Ltd, Bombay.Google Scholar
6.Hossain, M. 1991. The evolution of the food situation in Bangladesh. Paper presented at seminar on Political Economy and Agricultural Achievements in Low Income African and Asian Countries, March 20–22, France.Google Scholar
7.Hossain, S. M. A., Salam, M.U., and Alam, A. B. M. M.. 1994. Scenario of farm environment of Bangladesh and methodology for quality assessment. In Proc. Workshop on Environment Issues, Graduate Training Institute, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh.Google Scholar
8.Huq, S., Rahman, A. A., and Conway, G.R.. 1990. Environmental aspects of agricultural development in Bangladesh. In Huq, S., Rahman, A. A., and Conway, G. R. (eds.). Environmental Aspects of Agricultural Development in Bangladesh. UPL, Dhaka.Google Scholar
9.Islam, M. 1983. Soil management. Agricultural Research in Bangladesh, BARC, Dhaka.Google Scholar
10.Kashem, M. A. 1996. Implications of Environmental and Sustainability Issues for the Organization and Practice of Agricultural Extension: An Overview Summary of Bangladesh Study Area. Dept. of Agricultural Extension Education, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh.Google Scholar
11.Kaur, M. R. 1988. An evaluative study of women development program under Indo-German Dhauladhar Project Palampur, District Kumgra, H. P., Thesis abstract, Hariana Agricultural University, India, Vol. XVI (4).Google Scholar
12.Kaur, R., and Singh, R.. 1991. Adoption of smokeless chula by rural women. Indian J. Extension Education XXVII(1&2):34–38.Google Scholar
13.Kothari, C. R. 1995. Research Methodology - Methods and Techniques. Wishwa Prakashan, New Delhi.Google Scholar
14.Kumar, K. 1991. Cited in S. Parveen. 1993. Attitude of the rural women towards homestead agricultural production, M S Thesis, Dept. of Agricultural Extension Education, Bangladesh Agric. Univ., Mymensingh, Bangladesh.Google Scholar
15.Mannion, A. 1995. Agriculture and Environmental Change: Temporal and Spatial Dimensions. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
16.Papendick, R. I. 1992. Soil quality - the key to a sustainable agriculture. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 7:2–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Parr, J. F., Papendick, R. I., Hornick, S. B., and Meyer, R. E.. 1992. Soil quality: Attributes and relationship to alternative and sustainable agriculture. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 7:5–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Rogers, E. M. 1995. Diffusion of Innovations (4th edn). The Free Press, New York.Google ScholarPubMed
19.Shahabuddin, Q., Mujeri, M.K., and Zohir, S.. 1992. Land and Water Use in Rural Setting of Bangladesh. People, Development and Environment-A Complex Interlinkage in Bangladesh. BRDB & IUCN, Dhaka.Google Scholar
20.Singh, B., and Kunzroo, O. N.. 1985. Attitude of farmers towards goat and sheep farming. Indian J. Extension Education XXI(1&2):54–60.Google Scholar