Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T17:45:53.557Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economics of widespread manure application to irrigated crops: Raw and composted feedlot manure in eastern Colorado

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

Erda Wang  and
Ed Sparling
Erda Wang
Affiliation:
Research Economist, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.
Ed Sparling
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.
Get access

Abstract

We used linear programming to simulate adoption of manure disposal technologies in eastern Colorado. Manure, either raw or composted, is assumed to be applied to irrigated cropland within 20 miles of feedlots in five subregions of eastern Colorado. We constrained the application so that total N application is no more than the amount used by the crop. N, P and K contents are taken into account, but no benefits are assigned to organic matter or trace minerals and no costs are assigned to soil compaction, weed seed propagation, or inconvenience. Irrigated land within 10 miles of feedlots can easily absorb all manure generated under this scenario. Manure is found to be an economical substitute for chemical fertilizers, assuming N content to be at least 50% that of fresh manure. Composted manure is either more or less profitable than raw manure, depending on its N content. Hauling costs are lower for compost, but composting costs are between $1 and $2 per finished ton. The model does not allow for mixed application of compost and chemical fertilizers, which would increase the value of compost significantly. A feedlot waste sector that composted all feedlot manure in eastern Colorado is predicted to create between 80 and 200 additional jobs.

Keywords

beef cattlecompostinglinear programming
Type
Articles
Information
American Journal of Alternative Agriculture , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , December 1995 , pp. 167 - 172
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Colorado Agricultural Statistics Service. 1990. Colorado Agricultural Statistics. Lakewood, Colorado.Google Scholar
2.Colorado Cattle Feeders Association. 1991. Colorado Feeders Association Map of Feedlot Location. Denver, Colorado.Google Scholar
3.Colorado Land Use Commission. 1974. Potential for irrigated and nonirrigated agriculture 1974. Office of the Governor, Denver.Google Scholar
4.Dalsted, N.L., Gutierrez, P.H., Schaubert, D.L., Sharp, R.L., and Holman, K.L.. 1990. Selected 1988–1989 crop enterprise budgets for Colorado. Repts. IR:90-1 and IR:90-2. Dept. of Agric. and Resource Economics, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins.Google Scholar
5.Follett, R.H., and Croissant, R.L.. 1990. Use of manure in crop production. No. 549. Dept. of Agronomy, Colorado State Univ. Cooperative Extension.Google Scholar
6.Hazell, P., and Norton, R.D.. 1986. Mathematical Programming for Economic Analysis in Agriculture. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York, N. Y.Google Scholar
7.Madsen, A.G., and Gee, C.K.. 1986. The economics of fed beef production in Colorado. Technical Bull. L86-2. Dept. of Agric. and Resource Economics, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins.Google Scholar
8.May, L.L. 1993. Agronomic and economic considerations in composting feedlot wastes for use as a soil amendment. M.S. Technical Paper. Dept. of Agric. and Resource Economics, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins.Google Scholar
9.May, L.L., and Tepfer, D.. 1992. Potential for composting as a means of organic waste disposal in five counties in southeastern Colorado. A report to the Commissioners of Bent, Crowley, Kiowa, Otero, and Prowers Counties. Dept. of Agric. and Resource Economics, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins.Google Scholar
10.McKean, J.R., Ericson, R.K., and Weber, J.C.. 1982. An economic input-output study of the High Plains Region of eastern Colorado. Technical Rept. No. 29, Colorado Water Resources Research Institute, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins.Google Scholar
11.Overcash, M.R., Humenik, F.J., and Miner, R.J.. 1983. Livestock Waste Management. Vol. I. CAC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
12.Spencer, W.P., and Rhodd, J.. 1991. Grain flow survey: 1990. DARE Information Rept. No. IR.91-1. Dept. of Agric. and Resource Economics, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins.Google Scholar
13.Wang, E. 1993. Economic impacts of water scarcity and beef feedlot manure regulations in eastern Colorado. Ph.D. Dissertation, Dept. of Agric. and Resource Economics, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins.Google Scholar
14.U.S. Dept. of Commerce. 1989. 1987 Census of Agriculture. Bureau of the Census, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar