Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T03:05:44.902Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economic methods for comparing alternative crop production systems: A review of the literature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

Wayne S. Roberts  and
Scott M. Swinton
Wayne S. Roberts
Affiliation:
Graduate research assistant, Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1039.
Scott M. Swinton
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1039.
Get access

Abstract

New crop production technologies developed in response to growing concern over environmental contamination from agriculture may be neither more profitable nor higher yielding than the systems they replace, but they often reduce environmental contamination or improve soil and water quality. Systems designed with environmental objectives cannot be evaluated fairly just by productivity, which is what often is done in economic studies of alternative systems. We review 58 recent studies comparing alternative crop production systems to identify the key criteria for system comparisons, the system characteristics important in designing the analysis, and the methods most suited for comparing alternative systems.

The four key criteria we looked for in system comparisons are expected profit, stability of profits, expected environmental impacts, and stability of environmental impacts. Most economic studies of crop production focus exclusively on profitability, and incorporate neither environmental criteria nor the dynamic characteristics inherent in alternative systems. We identify promising new approaches that take account of specific environmental characteristics and attempt to balance the objectives of profitability and environmental risk management. Balanced environmental-economic analysis is most likely to be achieved by integrating biophysical simulation models with economic optimization methods to model the trade-offs among profitability, environmental impact, and system stability (both financial and environmental).

Keywords

alternative agricultureanalytical methodscrop systemseconomic analysisenvironmental managementprofitabilityriskstability
Type
Articles
Information
American Journal of Alternative Agriculture , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , March 1996 , pp. 10 - 17
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Antle, J.M., and Capalbo, S.M.. 1993. Integrating economics and physical models for analyzing environmental effects of agricultural policy on nonpointsource pollution. In Russell, C.S. and Shogren, J.F. (eds). Theory, Modeling and Experience in the Management of Nonpoint-Source Pollution. Kluwer, Boston, Massachusetts, pp. 155–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Baffoe, J.K., Stonehouse, D.P., and Kay, B.D.. 1987. Methodology for farmlevel economic analysis of soil erosion effects under alternative crop rotational systems. Canadian J. Agric. Economics 35:55—74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Batte, M.T., Forster, D.L., and Hitzhusen, F.J.. 1993. Organic agriculture in Ohio: An economic perspective. J. Production Agric. 6:536–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Beattie, B., Thompson, S., and Boehlje, M.. 1974. Product complementarity in production: The by-product case. Southern J. Agric. Economics 6:161–165.Google Scholar
5.Berardi, G.M. 1978. Organic and conventional wheat production: Examination of energy and economics. Agroecosystems 4:367–376.Google Scholar
6.Bole, J.B., and Freeze, B.S.. 1986. Modeling the economic returns from fixed and soil moisture-based flexible rotations. Canadian Farm Economics 20:15–20.Google Scholar
7.Bouzaher, A., Archer, D., Cabe, R., Carriquiry, A., and Shogren, J.. 1992. Effects of environmental policy on trade-offs in agri-chemical management. J. Environmental Management 36:69–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Carriker, G.L. 1995. Factor input demand subject to economic and environmental risk: Nitrogen fertilizer in Kansas dryland corn production. Review Agric. Economics 17:77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Center for Farm Financial Managements. 1995. PLANETOR User's Manual. Version 2.0. Dept. of Agric. and Applied Economics, Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul.Google Scholar
10.Chase, C., and Duffy, M.. 1991. An economic comparison of conventional and reduced-chemical farming systems in Iowa. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 6:168–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Conway, G.R. 1994. Sustainability in agricultural development: Trade-offs between productivity, stability, and equitability. J. Farming Systems Research-Extension 4(2): 1–14.Google Scholar
12.Cox, C.A., and Easter, K.W.. 1990. A regional ban of alachlor and atrazine in southeastern Minnesota: The economic and environmental impacts. Staff Paper P90-58. Dept. of Agric. and Applied Economics, Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul.Google Scholar
13.Crowder, B.M., Pionke, H.B., Epp, D. J., and Young, C.E.. 1985. Using CREAMS and economic modeling to evaluate conservation practices: An application. J. Environmental Quality 14:428–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Dabbert, S., and Madden, P.. 1986. The transition to organic agriculture: A multi-year simulation model of a Pennsylvania farm. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 1:99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Diebel, P.L., and Williams, J.R.. 1993. An economic analysis of the Integrated Farm Management Program Option for corn and wheat rotations. Review of Agric. Economics 15:417–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Diebel, P.L., Williams, J.R., and Llewelyn, R.V., (in press). An economic analysis of conventional and alternative cropping systems for a representative northeast Kansas farm. Review of Agric. Economics.Google Scholar
17.Dobbs, T.L. 1993. Implications of sustainable farming systems in the northern Great Plains for farm profitability and size. Staff Paper 93–5. Economics Dept, South Dakota State Univ., Brookings.Google Scholar
18.Dobbs, T.L. 1994. Organic, conventional, and reduced till farming systems: Profitability in the northern Great Plains. Choices 9 (2nd Quarter):31–32.Google Scholar
19.Dobbs, T.L., Leddy, M.G., and Smolik, J.D.. 1988. Factors influencing the economic potential for alternative farming systems: Case analysis in South Dakota. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 3:26–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Domanico, J.L., Madden, P., and Partenheimer, E.J.. 1986. Income effects of limiting soil erosion under organic, conventional, and no-till systems in eastern Pennsylvania. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 1:75–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Ess, D.R., Vaughan, D.H., Luna, J.M., and Sullivan, P.G.. 1994. Energy and economic savings from the use of legume cover crops in Virginia corn production. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 9:178–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Faeth, P. 1993. Evaluating agricultural policy and the sustainability of production systems: An economic framework. J. Soil and Water Conservation 48:94–99.Google Scholar
23.Foltz, J.C., Lee, J.G., and Martin, M.A.. 1993. Farm-level economic and environmental impacts of eastern corn belt cropping systems. J. Production Agric. 6:290–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Fox, G., Weersink, A., Sarwar, G., Duff, S., and Deen, B.. 1991. Comparative economics of alternative agricultural production systems: A review. Northeastern J. Agric. and Resource Economics 20:124–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Goldstein, W.A., and Young, D.L.. 1987. An agronomic and economic comparison of a conventional and a low-input cropping system in the Palouse. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 2:51–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Hanson, J.C., Johnson, D.M., Peters, S.E., and Janke, R.R.. 1990. The profitability of sustainable agriculture on a representative grain farm in the mid-Atlantic region, 1981–89. Northeast J. Agric. and Resource Economics 19:90–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Hayami, Y., and Ruttan, V.W.. 1985. Agricultural Development: An International Perspective. 2nd ed.Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore, Maryland.Google Scholar
28.Helmers, G.A., Langemeier, M.R., and Atwood, J.. 1986. An economic analysis of alternative cropping systems for eastcentral Nebraska. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 1:153–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.Higley, L.G., and Wintersteen, W.K.. 1992. A novel approach to environmental risk assessment of pesticides as a basis for incorporating environmental costs into economic injury level. Amer. Entomologist 38:34–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30.Hilker, J.H., Black, J.R., and Hesterman, O.B.. 1987. Break-even analysis for comparing alternative crops. Extension Bull. E-2021. MSU Extension, Michigan State Univ., East Lansing.Google Scholar
31.Hoag, D., and Hornsby, A.. 1992. Coupling groundwater contamination with economic returns when applying farm pesticides. J. Environmental Quality 21:579–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32.Ikerd, J.E. 1991. A decision support system for sustainable farming. Northeastern J. Agric. and Resource Economics 20:109–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33.Ikerd, J., Monson, S., and Van Dyne, D.. 1993. Alternative farming systems for U.S. agriculture: New estimates of profit and environmental effects. Choices 8 (3rd Quarter):37–38.Google Scholar
34.Irwin-Hewitt, T., and Lohr, L.. 1993. Economic and environmental impacts of alternative cropping sequences in Michigan. Agricultural resources: Inputs situation and outlook. AR-29. Economic Research Service, U.S. Dept. of Agric, Washington, D.C. pp. 40–43.Google Scholar
35.Johnson, S.L., Adams, R.M., and Perry, G.M.. 1991. The on-farm costs of reducing groundwater pollution. Amer. J. Agric. Economics 73:1063–1073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36.Klepper, R., Lockeretz, W., Commoner, B., Gertler, M., Fast, S., O'Leary, D., and Blobaum, R.. 1977. Economic performance and energy intensiveness on organic and conventional farms in the corn belt: A preliminary comparison. Amer. J. Agric. Economics 59:1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37.Knutson, R.D., Taylor, C.R., Penson, J.B., and Smith, E.G.. 1990. Economic impacts of reduced chemical use. Knutson and Associates, College Station, Texas.Google Scholar
38.Kovach, J., Petzoldt, C., Degni, J., and Tette, J.. 1992. A method to measure the environmental impact of pesticides. New York Food and Life Sciences Bull. 139. New York State Agric. Exp. Sta., Geneva.Google Scholar
39.Langley, J.A., Heady, E.O., and Olson, K.D.. 1983. The macro implications of a complete transformation of U.S. agricultural production to organic farming practices. Agric, Ecosystems and Environment 10:323–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40.Lazarus, S.S., and White, G.B.. 1984. Economic impact of introducing rotations on Long Island potato farms. Northeastern J. Agric. and Resource Economics 13:221–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41.Lazarus, W.F., Hoffman, L.D., and Partenheimer, E.J.. 1979. Evaluation of selected cropping systems on Pennsylvania dairy farms. J. Northeastern Agric Economics Council 8:43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42.Legg, T.D., Fletcher, J.J., and Easter, K.W.. 1989. Nitrogen budgets and economic efficiency: A case study of southeastern Minnesota. J. Production Agric 2:110–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43.Lesoing, G., and Francis, C.. 1993. Rotation/manure effects on crop yields and soil characteristics at ARDC. Crop Production News 13.Google Scholar
44.Lockeretz, W., Shearer, G., Klepper, R., and Sweeney, S.. 1978. Field crop production on organic farms in the Midwest. J. Soil and Water Conservation 33:130–134.Google Scholar
45.Lockeretz, W., Shearer, G., and Kohl, D.H.. 1981. Organic farming in the corn belt. Science 211:540–547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
46.McQueen, A.D., Shulstad, R.N., and Osborn, C.T.. 1982. Controlling agricultural soil loss in Arkansas' north Lake Chicot watershed: A cost analysis. J. Soil and Water Conservation 37:182–185.Google Scholar
47.Mends, C., Dobbs, T.L., and Smolik, J.D.. 1989. Economic results of alternative farming systems trials at South Dakota State University's research station, 1985–1989. Research Rep. 89–3. Economics Dept., South Dakota State Univ., Brookings.Google Scholar
48.Moffitt, L.J., Burrows, T.M., Burrows, J.L., Baritelle, J.L., and Sevacherian, V.. 1984. Risk evaluation of early termination for pest control in cotton. Western J. Agric. Economics 9:145–151.Google Scholar
49.Olson, K.D., Langley, J., and Heady, E.O.. 1982. Widespread adoption of organic farming practices: Estimated impacts on U.S. agriculture. J. Soil and Water Conservation 37:41–45.Google Scholar
50.Painter, K., Granatstein, D., and Miller, B.. 1992. 1992 alternative crop rotation enterprise budgets, eastern Whitman county, Washington. Farm Business Management Report EB1725. Cooperative Extension, Washington State Univ., Pullman.Google Scholar
51.Ribaudo, M.O. 1986. Regional estimates of off-site damages from soil erosion. In Waddell, Thomas E. (ed). The Off-site Costs of Soil Erosion. Conservation Foundation, Washington, D.C. pp. 29–48.Google Scholar
52.Sahs, W.W., Helmers, G.A., and Langemeier, M.R.. 1988. Comparative profitability of organic and conventional production systems in east-central Nebraska. In Global Perspectives on Agroecology and Sustainable Agriculture Systems. Proc Sixth Int. Scientific Conf. of the International Federation of Organic Agric. Movements. Agroecology Program, Univ. of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
53.Schoney, R.A., and Thorson, T.. 1986. The economic impact of extended crop rotations on Saskatchewan grain farms. Canadian Farm Economics 20:21–26.Google Scholar
54.Shearer, G., Kohl, D.H., Wanner, D., Kuepper, G., Sweeney, S., and Lockeretz, W.. 1981. Crop production costs and returns on Midwestern organic farms: 1977 and 1978. Amer. J. Agric. Economics 63:264–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
55.Smolik, J.D., Dobbs, T.L., and Rickerl, D.H.. 1995. The relative sustainability of alternative, conventional, and reduced-till farming systems. Amer. J. Alternative Agric 10:25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
56.Swinton, S.M., and Clark, D.S.. 1994. Farm-level evaluation of alternative policy approaches to reduce nitrate leaching from Midwest agriculture. Agric and Resource Economics Review 23:66–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
57.Tauer, L.W. 1983. Target MOTAD. Amer. J. Agric Economics 65:606–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
58.Taylor, M.L., Adams, R.M., and Miller, S.F.. 1992. Farm-level response to agricultural effluent control strategies: The case of the Willamette Valley. J. Agric. and Resource Economics 17:173–185.Google Scholar
59.Teague, M.L., Bernardo, D.J., and Mapp, H.P.. 1995a. Farm-level economic analysis incorporating stochastic environmental risk assessment. Amer. J. Agric Economics. 77:8–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
60.Teague, M.L., Bernardo, D.J., and Mapp, H.P.. 1995b. Meeting environmental goals efficiently on a farm-level basis. Review of Agric. Economics 17:37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
61.Teague, M.L., Mapp, H.P., and Bernardo, D.J.. 1995c Risk indices for economic and water quality tradeoffs: An application to Great Plains agriculture. J. Production Agric. 8:405–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
62.Van Kooten, G.C., Weisensel, W.P., and Chinthammit, D.. 1990. Valuing trade-offs between net returns and stewardship practices: The case of soil conservation in Saskatchewan. Amer. J. Agric. Economics 72:104–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
63.Westra, J.V., and Boyle, K.J.. 1992. An economic analysis of crops grown in rotation with potatoes in Aroostook county, Maine. Maine Agric. Exp. Sta. Bull. 834. Dept. of Agric. and Resource Economics, Univ. of Maine, Orono.Google Scholar
64.Xu, F., Prato, T., and Ma, J.C.. 1995. A farm-level case study of sustainable agricultural production. J. Soil and Water Conservation 50:39–44.Google Scholar
65.Young, D.L., and Painter, K.M.. 1990. Farm program impacts on incentives for green manure rotations. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 5:99–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
66.Young, L., and van Kooten, G.C.. 1989. Economics of flexible spring cropping in a summer fallow region. J. Production Agric. 2:173–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
67.Zentner, R.P., Lindwall, C.W., and Carefoot, J.M.. 1988. Economics of rotations and tillage systems for winter wheat production in southern Alberta. Canadian Farm Economics 22:3–14.Google Scholar