Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T01:48:26.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Biological control of weeds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

George E. Templeton
George E. Templeton
Affiliation:
University Professor of Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701.
Get access

Abstract

A shortage of effective, non-chemical pest control measures is a major constraint to more widespread adoption of sustainable agricultural practices. Overcoming this constraint with biological pest control tactics appears to be an attainable goal but will require substantial public sector support. Biological agents that are self-perpetuating do not offer profit incentive to private industry. On the other hand, microbial pesticides, which do require annual application, often are so highly specific for particular pests that the private sector is unable to risk venture capital for their development. Collaboration between public- and private-sector scientists is essential for biological pesticide development. In the U.S., a model working relationship for technology transfer between the private and public sector has been achieved with two commercial mycoherbicides, Collego™ and DeVine™. The model illustrates the strengths of the public sector for creating and storing fundamental knowledge of biological interactions at the organismal and ecosystem levels, also the capability of the private sector for large-scale production of fungi, for drying labile, living products, for effective patent protection, for satisfying EPA registration requirements, and for the commercial distribution, marketing and servicing of agricultural products. From three perspectives-biological, technical, and commercial—the success of Collego™ and DeVine™ has provided a definite step in the quest for low-cost weed control methods that are not hazardous to the environment nor in ground water. These successes also provide a model for an approach to reducing the dependence of agriculture upon chemical herbicides, the most extensively used chemical pesticides in agricultural production, likewise a useful insight toward technology that can lead to more widespread adoption of low-input, environmentally compatible and sustainable agricultural production.

Keywords

sporesplant pathogenColletotrichum gloeosporioidesCollego™DeVine™weed killernorthern jointvetchdiscoverydevelopmentmycoherbicides
Type
Articles
Information
American Journal of Alternative Agriculture , Volume 3 , Issue 2-3 , Spring-Summer 1988 , pp. 69 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Anonymous. 1978. Biological agents for pest control — status and prospects. U.S. Dept. of Agric. U.S. Printing Office, Washington, DC. 138 pp.Google Scholar
2. Anonymous. 1982. Pesticide registration: Proposed data requirements, Part III. Proposed rules. Federal Register 47(227):53112–53127.Google Scholar
3. Anonymous. 1983. Pesticide registration: Proposed data requirements, corrections. Federal Register 48(12):2142–2147.Google Scholar
4.Ayers, J. H., Blue, T. A., Bramhall, R. R., Braunstein, T. J., Davis, E. E., DeGraw, J. I., Elward, T. E., Inman, R. E., Johnson, O. H., Leaf, E. B., Offensend, F. L., and Stent, P. S.. 1977. New, innovative pesticides: An evaluation of incentives and disincentives for commercial development by industry. Stanford Research Institute, Report to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Pesticide Programs Criteria and Evaluation Division. Washington, DC. EPA Contract 68–01–2487.Google Scholar
5.Barron, K. C. 1981. Are pesticides really necessary? Regnery Gateway, Inc. Book Publishers, Chicago, Illinois. 245 pp.Google Scholar
6.Beasley, J. N., Patterson, L. T., Templeton, G. E., and Smith, R. J. Jr., 1975. Responses of animals to a fungus used as a biological herbicide. Ark. Farm Res. 24(6): 16.Google Scholar
7.Bowers, R. C. 1982. Commercialization of microbial biological control agents. In Charudattan, R. and Walker, H. L. (eds.). Biological Control of Weeds with Plant Pathogens, pp. 157–173. John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York. 293 pp.Google Scholar
8.Bowers, R. C. 1986. Commercialization of Collego™ — an industrialist's view. Weed Sci. 34 (Suppl. 1):24–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Charudattan, R. 1982. Regulation of microbial biological control agents. In Charudattan, R. and Walker, H. L. (eds.). Biological Control of Weeds with Plant Pathogens, pp. 175–188. John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York. 293 pp.Google Scholar
10.Charudattan, R. 1984. Microbial control of plant pathogens and weeds. J. Georgia Entomological Soc. Supp. 2, Vol. 19(31):40–62.Google Scholar
11.Charudattan, R. 1985. The use of natural and genetically altered strains of pathogens for weed control. In Herzog, D. and Hoy, M. (eds.). Biological Control in Agricultural IPM Systems. Academic Press, New York, New York, pp. 347–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Charudattan, R. 1986. Integrated control of water-hyacinth [Eichornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms] with a pathogen, insects and herbicides. Weed Sci. 34 (Suppl. 1):26–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Charudattan, R. 1987. Fungi help fight the war of the weeds. In Research 87 Biocontrol. University of Florida, Agricultural Experiment Station, Gainesville, Florida. pp. 38–39.Google Scholar
14.Churchill, B. W. 1982. Mass production of microorganisms for biological control. In Charudattan, R. and Walker, H. L. (eds.). Biological Control of Weeds with Plant Pathogens, pp. 137–156. John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York. 293 pp.Google Scholar
15.Daniel, J. T., Templeton, G. E., Smith, R. J. Jr., and Fox, W. T.. 1973. Biological control of nothern jointvetch in rice with an endemic fungal disease. Weed Sci. 21:303–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Freeman, T. E., and Charudattan, R.. 1981. Biological control of weeds with plant pathogens. Prospectus – 1980. In Del Fosse, E. S. (ed.). Proc. Fifth Intl. Symp. on Biological Control of Weeds, pp. 293–299. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Australia. 649 pp.Google Scholar
17.Griffith, C. H. 1981. Personal communication. The Noble Foundation, Ardmore, Oklahoma 73401.Google Scholar
18.Guest, R. T. 1984. The IR-4 biorational registration program. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. of Am. p. 74.Google Scholar
19.Hasan, S. 1974. Recent advance in the use of plant pathogens as biological control agents of weeds. Pest Articles and News Summaries 20:437–443.Google Scholar
20.Kenney, D. S., Conway, K. E., and Ridings, W. H.. 1979. Mycoherbicides – potential for commercialization. In Underkofler, L. A. (ed.). Developments in Industrial Microbiology. Society for Industrial Microbiology, Arlington, Virginia, pp. 123–130.Google Scholar
21.National Academy of Science. 1987. Research Briefings 1987. Report of the Research Briefing Panel on Biological Control in Managed Ecosystems. National Academy Press, Washington, DC. 12 pp.Google Scholar
22.Peberdy, J. R. 1983. Genetic recombination in fungi following protoplast fusion and transformation. In Smith, J. E. (ed.). Fungal Differentiation. Marcel Dekker, New York, New York. pp. 559–581.Google Scholar
23.Ridings, W. H. 1986. Biological control of stranglervine (Morrenia odorata Lindl.) in citrus – a researcher's view. Weed Sci. Suppl. 34:Supp. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Smith, R. J. Jr., 1982. Integration of microbial herbicides with existing pest management programs. In Charudattan, R. and Walker, H. L. (eds.). Biological Control of Weeds with Plant Pathogens, pp. 189–203. John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York. 293 pp.Google Scholar
25.Smith, R. J. Jr., 1986. Biological control of northern jointvetch [Aeschynomene virginica (L.) B.S.P.] in rice and soybeans – a researcher's view. Weed Sci. 34 (Suppl. 1):17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.TeBeest, D. O. 1982. Survival of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides f. sp. aeschynomene in rice irrigation water and soil. Plant Dis. 66:469–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.TeBeest, D. O., and Templeton, G. E.. 1985. Mycoherbicides: Progress in the biological control of weeds. Plant Dis. 69:6–10.Google Scholar
28.TeBeest, D. O., Templeton, G. E., and Smith, R. J. Jr., 1978a. Decline of a biocontrol fungus in field soil during winter. Ark. Farm Res. 27(1): 12.Google Scholar
29.TeBeest, D. O., Templeton, G. E., and Smith, R. J. Jr., 1978b. Temperature and moisture requirements for development of anthracnose on northern jointvetch. Phytopathology 68:389–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30.Templeton, G. E. 1982. Biological herbicides: Discovery, development, deployment. Weed Sci. 30:430–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31.Templeton, G. E. 1982. Status of weed control with plant pathogens. In Charudattan, R. and Walker, H. L. (eds.). Biological Control of Weeds with Plant Pathogens, pp. 29–44. John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York. 293 pp.Google Scholar
32.Templeton, G. E. 1986. Mycoherbicide research at the University of Arkansas – past, present and future. Weed Sci. 34 (Suppl. 1):35–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33.Templeton, G. E., and Smith, R. J. Jr., 1977. Managing weeds with pathogens. In Horsfall, J. G. and Cowling, E. G. (eds.). Plant Disease: An Advanced Treatise. Vol. I. Academic Press, New York, New York. pp. 167–176.Google Scholar
34.Templeton, G. E., Smith, R. J. Jr., and Klomparens, W.. 1980. Commercialization of fungi and bacteria for biological control. Biocontrol News Inf. 1(4):291–294.Google Scholar
35.Templeton, G. E., Smith, R. J. Jr., TeBeest, D. O., Beasley, J. N., and Klerk, R. A.. 1981. Field evaluation of dried fungus spores for biocontrol of curly indigo in rice and soybeans. Ark. Farm Res. 30(6):8.Google Scholar
36.Templeton, G. E., TeBeest, D. O., and Smith, R. J. Jr., 1979. Biological weed control with mycoherbicides. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 17:301–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37.Templeton, G. E., TeBeest, D. O., and Smith, R. J. Jr., 1984. Biological weed control in rice with a strain of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides (Penz.) Sacc. used as a mycoherbicide. Crop Protection 3(4):411–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38.United States Department of Agriculture. 1983. Proceedings of the Interdisciplinary Biological Control Conference, February 15–17, 1983. Las Vegas, Nevada. USDA Cooperative State Research Service, Washington, DC. 107 pp.Google Scholar