Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T17:55:17.845Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An alternative agricultural plan for the food-deficient, environmentally fragile hills of Nepal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

K.P. Pant*
Affiliation:
Agricultural Economist, Ministry of Agriculture, Singha Durbar, Kathmandu, Nepal;
V.K. Pandey
Affiliation:
Professor Emeritus (Agricultural Economics), Amaravati Colony, Sarbodaya Nagar, Lucknow 226016, India.
*
Corresponding author is K.P. Pant ([email protected]).
Get access

Abstract

Demand-driven agricultural production is unsustainable in Nepal since it is destroying the land base through soil erosion. The forests are also degrading from excessive fodder lopping (excising branches with leaf material) to feed farm animals. This study suggests an alternative for agricultural production, which minimizes environmental problems without impairing the present economic interests of the farmers. The study was conducted in the low-income, food-deficient, environmentally fragile hill district of Dhading in Nepal. A lexicographic goal-programming model was employed to generate an alternative plan that minimizes the environmental impacts relating to soil erosion, cattle grazing, forest fodder lopping, and use of inorganic fertilizers, and pesticides. Food-grain production, milk production, and returns to fixed farm resources are maintained at least at existing levels in the alternative plan. For delineating relationships between farm production and environmental problems, production of these commodities is hypothetically targeted at successively higher levels. The results indicate that the levels of environmental problems, except those from use of inorganic nitrogen fertilizers, are considerably reduced in the alternative farm production system. The alternative crop plan proposes the total exclusion of corn and oilseed crops and a marked decrease in the area under main season paddy rice. Instead, the areas under early paddy, upland paddy, wheat, pulses, and fodder crops would increase. The livestock plan suggests a decrease in the number of bullocks required, due to modification of the crop plan and sharing of bullocks among neighboring farmers. Replacement of cows by buffaloes for milk production is also proposed. Increasing food-grain production is more damaging to the fragile hill ecosystem than an equivalent increase in milk production.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Charnes, A., and Cooper, W.W.. 1961. Management Methods and Industrial Applications of Linear Programming. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
2.Clarman, W.L. 1987. Pesticide use in Nepal. ARPP Consultancy Report No. 9. The Annual Report on Portfolio Performance, World Bank. Submitted to Winrock International Institute for Agricultural Development, Kathmandu, Nepal.Google Scholar
3.CSWCRTI. 19771996. Soil and Water Conservation, Annual Reports. Central Soil and Water Conservation Research and Training Institute, Dehradun, India.Google Scholar
4.Dobbs, T.L. 1994. Agricultural systems in the context of sustainable development: The case of low-input sustainable agriculture (LISA). In APO. Sustainable Agriculture Development in Asia. Report of an APO study meeting, February 23 to March 5, Japan. Asian Productivity Organization, Tokyo, p. 2550.Google Scholar
5.Government of Uttar Pradesh. 1972. Annual Research Report 1971–72. State Soil Conservation Research Demonstration and Training Centre, Dept. of Agriculture, Lucknow, UP, India.Google Scholar
6.Gupta, R.K., and Khybri, M.L. (eds.). 1986. Soil Conservation in India. Central Soil and Water Conservation Research and Training Institute; Jugal Kishor, Dehradun, India.Google Scholar
7.HMG/Nepal. 1978. Field Measurements on Erosion and Sedimentation in Nepal. His Majesty's Government of Nepal, Dept. of Soil and Water Conservation, Kathmandu.Google Scholar
8.HMG/Nepal. 1991. Report on Run-off and Soil Loss Studies-1990. His Majesty's Government of Nepal, Dept. of Soil and Water Conservation, Technology Development and Demonstration Section, Kathmandu.Google Scholar
9.HMG/Nepal. 1993. National Sample Census of Agriculture 1991–92, District Dhading, Central Bureau of Statistics. His Majesty's Government of Nepal, Kathmandu. p. 911, 1521, 4855.Google Scholar
10.HMG/Nepal. 1995. Statistical Information on Nepalese Agriculture, 1994–95, Agricultural Statistics Division, Ministry of Agriculture. His Majesty's Government of Nepal, Kathmandu. p. 4854, 59.Google Scholar
11.HMG/Nepal. 1996a. Soil Loss and Runoff Study at Subbakuna Demonstration Centre, Surkhet, Annual Report 1995–96. His Majesty's Government of Nepal, Dept. of Soil Conservation, Kathmandu.Google Scholar
12.HMG/Nepal. 1996b. Kulekhani Soil Loss and Run-off Plot, Annual Report 1995–96. His Majesty's Government of Nepal, Dept. of Soil Conservation, Soil Conservation and Research Sections, Kathmandu.Google Scholar
13.ICIMOD. 1993. Economic and Environmental Development Planning for Bagmati Zone (Dhading District). Vol. II, Part V. International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development, Kathmandu, Nepal.Google Scholar
14.Ignizio, J.P. 1976. Goal Programming and Extensions. Lexington Books, Blue Ridge Summit, KY.Google Scholar
15.Ijiri, Y. 1965. Management Goals and Accounting for Control. North Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam.Google Scholar
16.IUCN. 1991. Environmental Pollution in Nepal—A Review of Studies. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, National Conservation Strategy Implementation Project, Kathmandu.Google Scholar
17.Ives, J.D., and Messerli, B.. 1990. The Himalayan Dilemma: Reconciling Development and Conservation. Routledge, London, p. 89.Google Scholar
18.Khybri, M.L., Bhardwaj, S.P., and Prasad, S.N.. 1986. Effect of common crops on soil and water loss on 4 percent slope in the Himalayan regions. In Gupta, R.K. and Khybri, M.L. (eds.). Soil Conservation in India. Central Soil and Water Conservation Research and Training Institute; Jugal Kishore, Dehradun, India.Google Scholar
19.Lee, S.M. 1972. Goal Programming for Decision Analysis. Auerhach, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
20.LRMP (Land Resource Mapping Project). 1986. Economics Report, Appendix Five, HMG/Nepal. Government of Canada; Renting Earth Sciences Limited, Ottawa.Google Scholar
21.Pant, K.P. 1998. Land Use Planning for Environment Friendly Hill Agriculture in Dhading District of Nepal. Ph.D. thesis. Gobinda Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, India.Google Scholar
22.Prasad, R., and Bhan, S.. 1968. Different cropping systems for soil and water conservation—conservation cropping systems. J. Soil Water Conserv. India 16(3/4):2934.Google Scholar
23.Rai, R.N. 1986. Problems and potentials of run-off harvesting and recycling in north eastern hill region. In Gupta, R.K. and Khybri, M.L. (eds.). Soil Conservation in India. Central Soil and Water Conservation Research and Training Institute; Jugal Kishore, Dehradun, India.Google Scholar
24.Romero, C., and Rehman, T. 1984. Goal programming and multiple criteria decision making in farm planning: An expository analysis. J. Agric. Econ. 35:177190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Singh, A. 1986. Management of agricultural lands for erosion control in N.E.H. region—case study. In Gupta, R.K. and Khybri, M.L. (eds.). Soil Conservation in India. Central Soil and Water Conservation Research and Training Institute; Jugal Kishore, Dehradun, India.Google Scholar
26.Singh, G., Dayal, R., and Bhola, S.N.. 1967. Soil and water loss (run-off) studies under different vegetative covers on 0.5 and 1 percent slope at Kota. J. Soil Water Conserv. India 15(3/4):1723.Google Scholar
27.Tamang, D. 1991. Indigenous soil fertility management systems in the hills of Nepal. In Shah, P.B., Scheier, H., Brown, S., and Riley, K. (eds.). Soil Fertility and Erosion Issues in the Middle Mountains of Nepal, Workshop Proceedings, Jhikhu Khola Watershed, April 22–25, 1991. International Development Research Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada.Google Scholar