Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T23:54:30.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Research and agriculture: Challenging the public system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

David B. Danbom
David B. Danbom
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of History, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105.
Get access

Abstract

The publicly sponsored agricultural research system in the United States has always had to deal with the tension between public expectations and scientific practices and standards. The equilibrium it established between those two contradictory demands has been unraveling since the 1960s. The contemporary challenge to the system is to redefine its public and scientific roles in an environment of rapid scientific change and of public debate and disunity.

Keywords

agricultural experiment stationsLISApublic agricultural researchscientific disciplinesagricultural technology
Type
Selected Papers from Conference on “Innovative Policies for Agricultural Research,” Boston, MA, November 21–22, 1991
Information
American Journal of Alternative Agriculture , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , September 1992 , pp. 99 - 104
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Browne, W.P. 1988. Private Interests, Public Policy, and American Agriculture. University Press of Kansas, Lawrence.Google Scholar
2.Buttel, F.H., and Busch, L.. 1988. The public agricultural research system at the crossroads. In Danbom, D. B. (ed). Publicly Sponsored Agricultural Research in the United States: Past, Present, and Future. Agricultural History Society, Washington, D.C. pp. 303–324.Google Scholar
3.Carson, R. 1962. Silent Spring. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
4.Danbom, D.B. 1979. The Resisted Revolution: Urban America and the Industrialization of Agriculture, 1900–1930. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames.Google Scholar
5.Danbom, D.B. 1990. “Our Purpose is to Serve”: The First Century of the North Dakota Agricultural Experiment Station. North Dakota Institute for Regional Studies, Fargo.Google Scholar
6.Dupree, A.H. 1957. Science in the Federal Government: A History of Policies and Activities to 1940. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
7.Fite, G.C. 1981. American Farmers: The New Minority. Indiana Univ. Press, Bloomington.Google Scholar
8.Goldschmidt, W. 1978. As You Sow: Three Studies in the Social Consequences of Agribusiness. Allanheld, Osmun and Co., Montclair, New Jersey.Google Scholar
9.Hightower, J. 1973. Hard Tomatoes, Hard Times. Schenkman Publishing Co., Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
10.Johnson, G.L., and Bonnen, J.T. (eds). 1991. Social Science Agricultural Agendas and Strategies. Michigan State Univ. Press, East Lansing.Google Scholar
11.Kerr, N.A., 1987. The Legacy: A Centennial History of the State Agricultural Experiment Stations, 1887–1987. Missouri Agric. Exp. Sta., Columbia.Google Scholar
12.Kerr, N.A. 1988. Institutionalizing the new agenda: The state agricultural experiment stations, 1977–1981. Agric. History 62:279–295.Google Scholar
13.Kirkendall, R.S. 1986. The agricultural colleges: Between tradition and modernization. Agric. History 60:3–21.Google Scholar
14.MacDonald, J.F. (ed). 1989. Biotechnology and Sustainable Agriculture: Policy Alternatives. National Agricultural Biotechnology Council, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
15.Marcus, A.I. 1985. Agricultural Science and the Quest for Legitimacy: Farmers, Agricultural Colleges, and Experiment Stations, 1870–1890. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames.Google Scholar
16.Mayer, A., and Mayer, J.. 1974. Agriculture, the Island Empire. Daedalus 103:83–95.Google Scholar
17.National Research Council. 1972. Report of the Committee on Research Advisory to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
18.Nye, R.L. 1983. Federal vs. state agricultural research policy: The case of California's Tulare Experiment Station, 1888–1909. Agric. History 57:436–449.Google Scholar
19.Office of Technology Assessment. 1981. An Assessment of the United States Food and Agricultural Research System. U.S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
20.Purcell, C.W. Jr., 1968. The administration of science in the Department of Agriculture, 1933–1940. Agric. History 42:231–240.Google Scholar
21.Rosenberg, C.E. 1964. The Adams Act: Politics and the cause of scientific research. Agric. History 38:3–12.Google Scholar
22.Rosenberg, C.E. 1971. Science, technology, and economic growth: The case of the agricultural experiment station scientist, 1875–1914. Agric. History 45:1–20.Google Scholar
23.Rossiter, M.W. 1979. The organization of the agricultural sciences. In Oleson, A. and Voss, J. (eds). The Organization of Knowledge in Modern American, 1860–1920. Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore, Maryland, pp. 211–248.Google Scholar
24.Savage, H.J. 1953. Fruit of an Impulse: Forty-Five Years of the Carnegie Foundation, 1905–1950. Harcourt, Brace and Co., New York, N.Y.Google Scholar
25.Schlebecker, J.T. 1975. Whereby We Thrive: A History of American Farming, 1607–1972. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames.Google Scholar
26.Shover, J.L. 1976. First Majority-Last Minority: The Transforming of Rural Life in America. Northern Illinois Univ. Press, De Kalb.Google Scholar
27.Veysey, L.R. 1965. The Emergence of the American University. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
28.Wallace, H.A. 1934. The social advantages and disadvantages of the engineering-scientific approach to civilization. Science 79:1–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed