Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T14:26:49.748Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

IPM adoption in northeastern U.S.: An examination of the IPM continuum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

Craig S. Hollingsworth  and
William M. Coli
Craig S. Hollingsworth*
Affiliation:
C.S. Hollingsworth is Extension Educator, Department of Entomology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA 01003.
William M. Coli
Affiliation:
Extension Educator and IPM Coordinator, Department of Entomology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA 01003.
*
Corresponding author is C.S. Hollingsworth ([email protected]).
Get access

Abstract

Survey data from sweet corn, strawberry, apple, and potato growers in nine northeastern U.S. states were used to assess relative levels of adoption of integrated pest management (IPM). Grower adoption of an IPM system was measured by assigning numerical values for completion of specific management practices, and summing the number of practice points. Practices included those for management of soil, nutrients, weeds, diseases and insects, and education. Numerical scores were used to describe IPM adoption as a continuum, with growers classified as low, moderate, or high adopters based on their completion of practices. The relative level of IPM adoption varied among crops and states. Forty-nine percent of sweet corn growers were found to be moderateto high-level IPM adopters, while 76% of strawberry growers, 90% of potato growers, and 69% of apple growers were moderate- to high-level adopters, respectively. Variation among states with respect to adoption of IPM is described and discussed.

Keywords

appleintegrated pest managementpotatostrawberrysweet corn
Type
Articles
Information
American Journal of Alternative Agriculture , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , December 2001 , pp. 177 - 183
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Bajwa, W.I., and Kogan, M. 1996. Compendium of IPM Definitions. Oregon State University, Integrated Plant Protection Center, Corvallis. Web site http://www.ip pc.orst.edu/ipmdeflnitions/ defineIII.html#90 (verified 1 July 2001).Google Scholar
2.Browner, C., Rominger, R., and Kessler, D.. 1993. Testimony before the Subcommittee on Department Operations and Nutrition, Committee on Agriculture, U.S. House of Representatives. 22 September.Google Scholar
3.Benbrook, C.M., Groth, E., Halloran, J.M., Hansen, M.K., and Marquardt, S.. 1996. Pest Management at the Crossroads. Consumers Union, Yonkers, NY.Google Scholar
4.Boutwell, J.L., and Smith, R.H.. 1981. A new concept in evaluating integrated pest management programs. Bull. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 27(2):117–118.Google Scholar
5.Calvin, D.G., Rajotte, E.G., and Harp, A.. 1992. A survey of integrated pest management (IPM) adoption in Pennsylvania (Contract number 449011). Final report to Pennsylvania Dept. of Agriculture. Pennsylvania State University, Dept. of Entomology, University Park.Google Scholar
6.Coli, W.M. 1990. A Report on University of Massachusetts Cooperative Extension Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Programs, 1989. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
7.Coli, W.M., and Hollingsworth, C.S.. 1996. Defining the ambiguous. The Grower (April):48–58.Google Scholar
8.Coli, W.M., Szala, R., Autio, W.R., Cooley, D.R., Hauschild, K.I., and Prokopy, R.P.. 1996. 1995 tree-fruit survey: Integrated pest management. Fruit Notes 61(3):13–18.Google Scholar
9.Corbet, P.S. 1981. Non-entomological impediments to the adoption of integrated pest management. Protection Ecol. 3:183–202.Google Scholar
10.Cowles, M.H., and Tette, J.P.. 1998. Interest grows in communicating the good news of IPM: IPM labels tell consumers about grower stewardship. New York State IPM Program Ann. Rep. Geneva, NY. p. 9.Google Scholar
11.Cowles, M.H., and Tette, J.P.. 1999. Marketplace requests for IPM-grown food: Ann. update. New York State IPM Program Ann. Rep. Geneva, NY. p. 11.Google Scholar
12.Cross, J.V., and Dickler, E.. 1994. Guidelines for integrated production of pome fruits in Europe. Tech. Guideline III. West Palaearctic Regional Section Bull. 17(9):1–8. General Secretariat, International Organization for Biological Control, Montfavet, France.Google Scholar
13.Dillman, D.A. 1978. Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
14.Frisbie, R.E., and Smith, J.R. Jr., 1991. Biologically intensive integrated pest management: The future. In Menn, J. J. and Steinhauer, A.L. (eds.). Progress and Perspectives for the 21st Century: Entomological Society of America Centennial Symposium. Entomological Society of America, Lanham, MD. p. 151–164.Google Scholar
15.Hamilton, G.C., Robson, M.G., Ghidiu, G.M., Samulis, R., and Prostko, E.. 1997. 75% adoption of integrated pest management by 2000? A case study from New Jersey. Amer. Entomol. 43(2):74–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Hollingsworth, C.S. 1994. IPM certification: A sign by the road. Amer. Entomol. 40(2):74–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Hollingsworth, C.S., Coli, W.M., and Hazzard, R.V.. 1996. Massachusetts IPM guidelines: Commodity specific definitions. Ext. Bull. SP-136. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
18.Kogan, M. 1998. Integrated pest management: Historical perspectives and contemporary developments. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 43:243–270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Koehler, G., Berkett, L., Eaton, A., Autio, W., Dill, J., Lord, W., MacHardy, W., Cooley, D., Faubert, H., Greene, D., and Wright, S.. 2000. New England Apple Pest Management Guide. Univ. of Maine Coop. Ext. Bull. Orono.Google Scholar
20.Lefferts, L.Y., and Heinicke, M.J.. 1996. Green food labels: Emerging opportunities for environmental awareness and market development. Mothers and Others for a Livable Planet, New York.Google Scholar
21.McDonald, D.G., and Glynn, C.J.. 1994. Difficulties in measuring adoption of apple IPM. Agric. Ecosys. Environ. 48:219–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Prokopy, R.J. 1993. Stepwise progress toward IPM and sustainable agriculture. IPM Practitioner 15(3):1–4.Google Scholar
23.Rajotte, E.G., Kazmierczak, R.F., Norton, G.W., Lambur, M.T., and Allen, W.A.. 1987. The National Evaluation of Extension's Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Programs. Appendix 3: Massachusetts Apple IPM Impact Study. Virg. Coop. Ext. Serv. Pub. 491–014. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg.Google Scholar
24.Salant, P., and Dillman, D.A.. 1994. How to Conduct Your Own Survey. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
25.Shaffer, E. 1999. Eco-labels appeal to more retailers. The Packer (17 May):A1–A6.Google Scholar
26.Tette, J.P., Kovach, J., Schwarz, M., and Brunno, D.. 1987. IPM in New York apple orchards—Development, demonstration and adoption. New York's Food Life Sci. Bull. 119. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
27.USDA. 1998. Pest Management Practices: 1997 Summary. SpCr 1(98). U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service, Agricultural Statistics Board, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
28.Vandeman, A., Fernandez-Cornejo, J., Jans, S., and Lin, B.H.. 1994. Adoption of integrated pest management in U.S. agriculture. ERS Bull. 707. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
29.Wearing, C.H. 1988. Evaluating the IPM implementation process. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 33:17–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar