Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T14:50:23.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of conversion to organic agricultural practices on soil biota

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

Matthew R. Werner
Affiliation:
Soil Ecologist, Agroecology Program, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064.
Daniel L. Dindal
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Environmental and Forest Biology, SUNY, College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, NY 13210.
Get access

Abstract

In the fifth year of an agricultural conversion experiment in Pennsylvania, we studied the soil biological community under three treatment regimes planted with corn: organic-manure, organic-legume, and a conventional system. The organic treatments consisted of complex crop rotations, cultivations, and organic matter inputs to control pests and maintain soil fertility. The conventional system consisted of a simple corn/soybean rotation with synthetic fertilizer and pesticide inputs. High rates of CO2 evolution (a measure of potential microbial activity) in the organic plots corresponded with high levels of organic matter input. Soil nematodes were most abundant in organic plots, although seasonal patterns differed between the two organic treatments. Soil microarthropods were dominated by fungivorous Prostigmata mites, which reached peak abundance in organic plots two to five months after organic matter incorporation. Oribatid mites, which were rare throughout the study, followed the same pattern of abundance in each treatment and were probably most influenced by tillage disturbances. Predatory Mesostigmata were generally more abundant in organic plots. Surface-dwelling Collembola were abundant briefly in the spring, but soil-dwelling species dominated numerically throughout the cropping season. Spring tillage appeared to have a strong negative effect on earthworm populations in all plots. Small earthworm species became abundant in organic-manure plots during the summer. Larger earthworm species were abundant in organic-legume and conventional plots after the autumn harvest, when crop residues covered the undisturbed soil The systems-level nature of the Conversion Project experiment makes it difficult to identify cause-effect relationships. The data do suggest that organic amendments tend to enhance soil biological activity, while tillage disturbances tend to disrupt the biotic community.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Anderson, J. P. E. 1982. Soil respiration. In A. L. Page, R. H. Miller, and D. R. Keeney(eds.). Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2, Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Second Edition. Am. Soc. Agron., Soil Sci. Soc. Am., Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 831872.Google Scholar
2.Buhlmann, A. 1984. Influence of agricultural practices on the population of Alliphis halleri (G. and R. Canestrini, 1881) (Acari: Gamasina). Acarology 6(2):901909.Google Scholar
3.Christiansen, K. 1964. Bionomics of Collembola. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 9:147178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Coleman, D. C. 1985. Through a ped darkly: An ecological assessment of root-soil-microbial-faunal interactions. In A. H. Fitter (ed.). Ecological Interactions in Soil. Blackwell Sci. Pub., Oxford, pp. 121.Google Scholar
5.Coleman, D. C., and Sasson, A.. 1978. Decomposer subsystem. In Breymeyer, A. J. and Van Dyne, G. M. (eds.). Grasslands, Systems Analysis and Man. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 609655.Google Scholar
6.Culik, M. N. 1983. The Conversion experiment: Reducing farm costs. J. Soil Water Conserv. 38(4):333335.Google Scholar
7.Curry, J. P. 1969. The qualitative and quantitative composition of the fauna of an old grassland site at Celbridge, Co. Kildare. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1:219227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Doran, J. W., Fraser, D. G., Culik, M. N., and Liebhardt, W. C.. 1987. Influence of alternative and conventional management on soil microbial processes and nitrogen availability. Am. J. Alternative Agric. 2(3):99106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Doran, J. W., and Werner, M. R.. 1990. Management and soil biology. In Francis, C. A., Flora, C. B., and King, L. D. (eds.). Sustainable Agriculture in Temperate Zones. Wiley, New York. pp. 205230.Google Scholar
10.Edwards, C. A., and Fletcher, K. E.. 1971. A comparison of extraction methods for terrestrial arthropods. In J. Phillipson (ed.). Methods of Study in Quantitative Soil Ecology: Population, Production and Energy Flow. IBP Handbook No. 18. Blackwell Sci. Pub., Oxford, pp. 150185.Google Scholar
11.Fraser, D. G., Doran, J. W., Sahs, W. W., and Lesoing, G. W.. 1988. Soil microbial populations and activities under conventional and organic management. J. Environ. Qual. 17:585590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Freckman, D., and Caswell, E. P.. 1985. The ecology of nematodes in agroecosystems. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 23:275296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Gates, G. E. 1970. Miscellanea megadrilogica. VIII. Megadrilogica 1(2):114.Google Scholar
14.Hendrix, P. F. 1987. Strategies for research and management in reduced-input agroecosystems. Am. J. Alternative Agric. 2(4):166172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.House, G. J., and Parmalee, R. W.. 1985. Comparison of soil arthropods and earthworms from conventional and no-tillage agroecosystems. Soil Tillage Res. 5:351360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Ingham, E. R., Trofymow, J. A., Ames, R. N., Hunt, H. W., Morley, C. R., Moore, J. C., and Coleman, D. C.. 1986. Trophic interactions and nitrogen cycling in a semi-arid grassland. I. Seasonal dynamics of the natural populations, their interactions and effects on nitrogen cycling. J. Appl. Ecol. 23:597614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Kethley, J. 1990. Prostigmata. In Dindal, D. L. (ed.). Soil Biology Guide. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
18.Kladivko, E. J., and Timmenga, H. J.. 1990. Earthworms and agricultural management. In Box, J. E. and Hammond, L. C. (eds.). Rhizosphere dynamics. Westview Press, Colorado. In Press.Google Scholar
19.Klute, A. 1965. Water capacity, In Black, C. A. (ed.). Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods. Amer. Soc. Agron., Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 273278.Google Scholar
20.Lee, K. E. 1985. Earthworms, their ecology and relationships with soils and land use. Academic Press, New York. 411 pp.Google Scholar
21.Liebhardt, W. C., Andrews, R. W., Culik, M. N., Harwood, R. R., Janke, R. R., Radke, J. K., and Rieger-Schwartz, S. L.. 1989. A comparison of crop production in conventional and low-input cropping systems during the initial conversion to low-input methods. Agron. J. 81:150159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Loots, G. C., and Ryke, P. A. J.. 1967. The ratio Oribatei: Trombidiformes with reference to organic matter content in soils. Pedobiologia 7:121124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Luxton, M. 1982. The biology of mites from beech woodland soil. Pedobiologia 23(1):18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Macfadyen, A. 1971. The soil and its total metabolism. In J. Phillipson (ed.). Methods of Study in Quantitative Soil Ecology: Population, Production and Energy Flow. IBP Handbook No. 18. Blackwell Sei. Pub., Oxford, pp. 114.Google Scholar
25.Martyniuk, S., and Wagner, G. H.. 1978. Quantitative and qualitative examination of soil microflora associated with different management systems. Soil Sci. 125(6):343350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Mitchell, M. J. 1977. Population dynamics of oribatid mites (Acari: Cryptostigmata) in an aspen woodland soil. Pedobiologia 17:305319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Moore, J. C., Snider, R. J., and Robertson, L. S.. 1984. Effects of different management practices on Collembola and Acarina in corn production systems. I. The effects of no-tillage and atrazine. Pedobiologia 26:143152.Google Scholar
28.Norton, R. A. 1985. Aspects of the biology and systematics of soil arachnids, particularly saprophagous and mycophagous mites. Quaest. Entomol. 21(4):523541.Google Scholar
29.Oatman, E. R., McMurtry, J. A., and Voth, V.. 1968. Suppression of two-spotted spider mite of strawberry with mass releases of Phytoseiulus persimilis. J.Econ. Entomol. 61:15171521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30.Oostenbrink, M. 1971. Nematodes. In J. Phillipson (ed.). Methods of Study in Quantitative Soil Ecology: Population, Production and Energy Flow. IBP Handbook No. 18. Blackwell Sci. Pub., Oxford, pp. 7282.Google Scholar
31.Patriquin, D. 1986. Biological husbandry and the “nitrogen problem” Biol. Agric. Hortic. 3:167189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32.Persson, T., Baath, E., Clarholm, M., Lundkvist, H., Soderstrom, B. E., and Sohlenius, B.. 1980. Trophic structure, biomass dynamics and carbon metabolism of soil organisms in a Scots pine forest. Ecol. Bull. Stockholm 32:419459.Google Scholar
33.Petersen, H., and Luxton, M.. 1982. A comparative analysis of soil fauna populations and their role in decomposition processes. Oikos 39:287388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34.Radke, J. K., Andrews, R. W., Janke, R. R., and Peters, S. E.. 1988. Low-input cropping systems and efficiency of water and nitrogen use. In W. L. Hargrove (ed.). Cropping strategies for efficient use of water and nitrogen. Amer. Soc. Agron., Spec. Pub. No. 51. pp. 193218.Google Scholar
35.Satchell, J. E. 1971. Earthworms. In J. Phillipson (ed.). Methods of Study in Quantitative Soil Ecology: Population, Production and Energy Flow. IBP Handbook No. 18. Blackwell Sci. Pub., Oxford, pp. 107127.Google Scholar
36.Seastedt, T. R. 1984. Microarthropods of burned and unburned tallgrass prairie. J. Kansas Entomol. Soc. 57(3):468476.Google Scholar
37.Sheals, J. G. 1956. Soil population studies. I. The effect of cultivation and treatment with insecticides. Bull. Entomol. Res. 47:803822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38.Singh, U. R. 1977. Relationship between the population density of soil microarthropods and mycoflora associated with litter and the total litter respiration on the floor of a sal forest in Varanasi, India. In U. Lohm and T. Persson (eds.). Soil Organisms as Components of Ecosystems. Proc. VI Intl. Coll. Soil Zool., Ecol. Bull. 25:463470.Google Scholar
39.Slater, C. S., and Hopp, H.. 1947. Relation of fall protection to earthworm populations and soil physical conditions. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 12:508511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40.Soderstrom, B., Baath, E., and Lundgren, B.. 1983. Decrease in soil microbiological activity and biomass due to nitrogen amendments. Can. J. Microbiol. 29:15001506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41.U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1980. Report and Recommendations on Organic Farming. U.S. Govt., Washington, DC. 94 pp.Google Scholar
42.Usher, M. B., Booth, R. G., and Sparkes, K. E.. 1982. A review of progress in understanding the organization of communities of soil arthropods. Pedobiologia 23:126144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43.Van Gundy, S. D., and Freckman, D. W.. 1977. Phytoparasitic nematodes in below ground agroecosystems. In U. Lohm and T. Persson (eds.). Soil Organisms as Components of Ecosystems. Proc. VI Intl. Coll. Soil Zool., Ecol. Bull. 25:320329.Google Scholar
44.Walter, D. E. 1987. Life history, trophic behavior, and description of Gamasellodes vermivorax n. sp. (Mesostigmata:Ascidae), a predator of nematodes and arthropods insemiarid grassland soils. Can. J. Zool. 65:16891695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
45.Werner, M. R. 1987. Impact of conversion to organic agricultural practices on soil ecosystems. Unpub. Ph.D. Thesis, SUNY-College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, New York.Google Scholar
46.Werner, M. R., and Dindal, D. L.. 1987. Nutritional ecology of soil arthropods. In Slansky, F. Jr., and Rodriguez, J. G. (eds.). Nutritional Ecology of Insects, Mites and Spiders. Wiley, New York. pp. 815836.Google Scholar
47.Whelan, J. 1978. Acarine succession in grassland on cutaway raised bog. Sci. Proc. Royal Dublin Soc. Ser. A 6(11):175183.Google Scholar
48.Yeates, G. W. 1979. Soil nematodes in terrestrial ecosystems. J. Nematol. 11(3):213229.Google ScholarPubMed