Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T11:05:03.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The compatibility of domestic birds with a nonchemical agroecosystem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

M. Sean Clark ,
Stuart H. Gage ,
Laura B. DeLind  and
Marian Lennington
M. Sean Clark
Affiliation:
Graduate Assistant, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.
Stuart H. Gage
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Entomology and the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.
Laura B. DeLind
Affiliation:
Senior Academic Specialist, Department of Anthropology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.
Marian Lennington
Affiliation:
Graduate student, Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.
Get access

Abstract

We evaluated free-range domestic chickens and geese as components of a nonchemical apple orchard intercropped with potato. Chickens and geese were compatible with the system but provided different benefits and had different requirements. Chickens were omnivorous and highly active throughout the day, and dispersed throughout the available area. In contrast, geese were strictly herbivorous and less active, and usually remained close to their coop and water source. Geese substantially reduced vegetation biomass under the trees and around the potatoes without damaging either crop. Chickens reduced noncrop vegetation biomass slightly but also consumed several insect species, including Japanese beetle and Colorado potato beetle. Factors influencing the feasibility of integrating domestic chickens or geese into agroecosystems are discussed.

Keywords

free-range chickensfree-range geeseapple orchardpotatointercroppingintegrationweed management
Type
Articles
Information
American Journal of Alternative Agriculture , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , September 1995 , pp. 114 - 121
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Altieri, M.A. 1987. Agroecology: The Scientific Basis of Alternative Agriculture. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
2.Appleby, M.C., and Hughes, B. O.. 1991. Welfare of laying hens in cages and alternative systems: Environmental, physical and behavioural aspects. World's Poultry Sci. J. 47:109–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Bellinder, R.R., and Wallace, R.W.. 1991. An integrated production management approach to weed control in potatoes. In Pimentel, D. and Hanson, A.A. (eds). CRC Handbook of Pest Management in Agriculture. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, pp. 677–688.Google Scholar
4.Cramer, C. 1992. Weeder geese boost berry profits $222. The New Farm 14(4):38–40Google Scholar
5.Crews, T.E., and Gliessman, S.R.. 1991. Raised field agriculture in Tlaxcala, Mexico: An ecosystem perspective on maintenance of soil fertility. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 6:9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Dazhong, W., and Pimentel, D.. 1986. Seventeenth century organic agriculture in China: Cropping systems in Jiaxing region. Human Ecology 14:1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Dazhong, W., Yingxin, T., Xunhua, Z., and Yungzhen, H.. 1992. Sustainable and productive agricultural development in China. Agric., Ecosystems and Environment 39:55–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Edens, T.C., and Haynes, D.L.. 1982. Closed system agriculture: Resource constraints, management options, and design alternatives. Annual Review of Phytopathology 20:363–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Edwards, C.A. 1989. The importance of integration in sustainable agricultural systems. Agric., Ecosystems and Environment 27:25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Fuan, L. 1985. Integration of duck production and rice culture in south China. In Farrell, D.J. and Sampleton, P. (eds). Duck Production Science and World Practice. Univ. of New England, Armidale, Australia, pp. 385–392.Google Scholar
11.Gillen, R.L., and Scifres, C.J.. 1991. Selective grazing as a weed control method. In Pimentel, D. and Hanson, A.A. (eds.). CRC Handbook of Pest Management in Agriculture. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, pp. 369–376.Google Scholar
12.Hill, S.B., and MacRae, R.J.. 1992. Organic farming in Canada. Agric, Ecosystems and Environment 39:71–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Hoare, A.H. 1928. The English Grass Orchard and the Principles of Fruit Growing. The Riverside Press, Great Britain.Google Scholar
14.Hough-Goldstein, J.A., Greiger, J., Chang, D., and Saylor, W.. 1993. Palatability and toxicity of the Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) to domestic chickens. Annals Entomological Soc. Amer. 86:158–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Lockeretz, W., Shearer, G., and Kohl, D.H.. 1981. Organic farming in the corn belt. Science 211:540–547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Mayton, E.L., Smith, E.V., and King, D.. 1945. Nutgrass eradication studies: IV Use of chickens and geese in the control of nutgrass, Cyperus rotundas L. J. Amer. Soc. Agronomy 37:785–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Mollison, B. 1988. Permaculture: A Designers' Manual. Tagari Publications, Tyalgum, New South Wales, Australia.Google Scholar
18.Prokopy, R.J. 1991. A small low-input commercial apple orchard in eastern North America: Management and economics. Agric., Ecosystems and Environment 33:353–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Raese, J.T. 1990. The importance of weed control and nitrogen fertilizer on growth and yield of young bearing apple and pear trees. J. Sustainable Agric. 1:7–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Reganold, J.P., Palmer, A.S., Lockhart, J.C., and Macgregor, A.N.. 1993. Soil quality and financial performance of biodynamic and conventional farms in New Zealand. Science 260:344–349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Rodale Institute. 1991. On-farm research: Summary of 1990 results. Emmaus, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
22.Ruddle, K., and Zhong, G.. 1988. Integrated Agriculture-Aquaculture in South China: The Dike-pond System on the Zhujiang Delta. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, England.Google Scholar
23.Rupp, L.A., and Anderson, J.L.. 1985. Growth and fruiting responses of young apple and tart cherry trees to weed control. HortScience 20:727–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Salatin, J. 1991. Profit by appointment only. The New Farm 13(6):8–12.Google Scholar
25.Silversides, F.G., Crawford, R.D., and Wang, H.C.. 1988. The cytogenetics of domestic geese. J. Heredity 79:6–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26.Smolik, J.D., Dobbs, T.L., Rickerl, D.H., Wrage, L.J., Buchenau, G.W., and Machacek, T.A.. 1993. Agronomic, economic, and ecological relationships in alternative (organic), conventional, and reduced-till farming systems. Bull. 718. Agric. Exp. Sta., South Dakota State Univ., Brookings.Google Scholar
27.Traupman, M. 1990. Profitable poultry on pasture. The New Farm 12(4):20–23.Google Scholar
28.Vandermeer, J. 1989. The Ecology of Intercropping. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, England.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.Vereijken, P. 1989. From integrated control to integrated farming, an experimental approach. Agric., Ecosystems and Environment 26:37–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30.Virginia Association of Biological Farming. 1993. Proceedings of the Virginia Association of Biological Farming. New River Chapter Farmer to Farmer Conference. Floyd, Virginia.Google Scholar
31.Wagstaff, H. 1987. Husbandry methods and farm systems in industrialised countries which use lower levels of external inputs: A review. Agric., Ecosystems and Environment 19:1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32.Zar, J.H. 1984. Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar
33.Zehnder, G.W., and Evanylo, G.K.. 1989. Influence of extent and timing of Colorado potato beetle defoliation on potato tuber production in eastern Virginia. J. Economic Entomology 82:948–953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar