Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T08:10:08.626Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A comparative study of pith cell death in stalk internodes of corn grown on organic and conventional fields

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 November 2009

M. S. Kang
M. S. Kang
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Agronomy, Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70803.
Get access

Abstract

A few farmers in the Midwest produce corn (Zea mays L.) commercially by using organic methods, i.e., use no synthetic fertilizers or pesticides. Studies have been conducted previously on organic vs. conventional fields to compare yield, soil properties, stalk lodging and rot, and crude protein. However, pith cell death in stalk internodes, an important trait related to stalk lodging and stalk rot, has not been studied previously under organic and conventional management systems. Fertility differences exist between organically-managed and conventionally-managed fields which can influence pith cell death and related traits. This study was conducted to compare pith cell death in corn stalks on matched pairs of organic and conventional fields (2 in Illinois, 2 in Iowa, and 1 in Minnesota). For the four lowermost consecutive internodes above the brace roots examined in this study, there was no consistent pattern for pith cell death differences among pairs. In three of five pairs, the second internode pith cell death was higher on organic fields than on conventional fields. The same pattern was observed for the third stalk internode. Numbers of European corn borer (Ostrinia nubilalis Hübner) were less in the stalks on organic plots, a plausible cause for greater stalk lodging and rot resistance on organically-managed fields. Further study of pith cell death and stalk rot relationship under organic and conventional managements is needed to elucidate fertility relations and other unique factors at work on organic and conventional fields. It appears that while there are some factors that affect pith cell death, stalk rot, and stalk lodging similarly, there may be other factors that affect these three traits differentially.

Type
Articles
Information
American Journal of Alternative Agriculture , Volume 1 , Issue 4 , Fall 1986 , pp. 165 - 168
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.BeMiller, J. N. and Pappelis, A. J.. 1965. 2-4-Dihy-droxy-7-methoxy-l, 4-benzoxazin-3-one glycoside in corn. I. Relation of water-soluble 1-butanol-soluble glucoside fraction content of pith cores and stalk rot resistance. Phytopathology 55:1237–1240.Google Scholar
2.Carson, M. L. and Hooker, A. L.. 1982. Reciprocal translocation test-cross analysis of genes for anthracnose stalk rot resistance in a corn inbred line. Phytopathology 72:175–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Christensen, J. J. and Schneider, C. L.. 1950. European corn borer (Pyrausta nubilalis) in relation to shank, stalk, and ear rots of corn. Phytopathology 40:284–291.Google Scholar
4.Christensen, J. J. and Wilcoxson, R. D.. 1966. Stalk rot of corn. Phytopathology Monograph No. 3. Am. Phytopathological Society. 59 pp.Google Scholar
5.Corn Annual. 1985. Corn Refiners Assoc., Inc., Wasington, DC.Google Scholar
6.Craig, J. and Hooker, A. L.. 1961. Relation of sugar trends and pith density to Diplodia stalk rot in corn. Phytopathology 51:376–382.Google Scholar
7.Dodd, J. L. 1977. A photosynthetic stress-translo-cation balance concept of corn stalk rot. Proceedings 32nd. Annual Corn Sorghum Res. Conf. 32:122–130.Google Scholar
8.Dodd, J. L. 1980. Grain sink size and predisposition of Zea mays to stalk rot. Phytopathology 70:534–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Gates, L. F. 1970. Relationship between pith cell death conditions as assessed by tetrazolium chloride and incidence of Gibberella stalk rot in corn. Can. J. Plant Sci. 50:674–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Cuthrie, W. D., Russell, W. A., Neumann, F. L., Reed, G. L., and Grindeland, R. L.. 1975. Yield losses in maize caused by different levels of infestation of second-brood European corn borers. Iowa State J. Res. 50:239–253.Google Scholar
11.Jarvis, J. L., Clark, R. L., and Guthrie, W. D.. 1982. Effect of second-generation European corn borers on resistance of maize to Diplodia maydis. Phytopathology 72:1149–1152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Kang, M. S., Pappelis, A. J., Mumford, P., Murphy, J. A., and BeMiller, J. N.. 1974. Effect of cob and shank inoculations (Diplodia maydis) on cell death in stalk internodes of corn. Plant Dis. Reptr. 58:1113–1117.Google Scholar
13.Kang, M. S., Pappelis, A. J., and Zuber, M. S.. 1986. Effect of stalk inoculation (Diplodia maydis) on parenchyma cell death in cob and shank internodes of maize. Cereal Research Communication 14:267–272.Google Scholar
14.Lockeretz, W., Shearer, G., and Kohl, D. H.. 1981. Organic farming in the corn belt. Science 211:540–547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Lockeretz, W., Shearer, G., Kuepper, G., Wanner, D., and Kohl, D. H.. 1980. Maize yields and soil nutrient levels with and without pesticides. Agron. J. 72:65–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Nelson, D. W. 1963. The relationship between soil fertility and the incidence of Diplodia stalk rot and northern leaf blight in Zea mays. M. S. Thesis. Univ. of Illinois, Urbana. 56 pp.Google Scholar
17.Pappelis, A. J. 1957. Nature of resistance to Diplodia stalk rot of corn. Ph.D. Thesis. Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA.Google Scholar
18.Pappelis, A. J. 1970. Effect of root and leaf injury on cell death and stalk rot susceptibility in corn. Phytopathology 60:355–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Pappelis, A. J., BeMiller, J. N., Schmid, W. E., Myers, O. Jr, and Murphy, J. A.. 1971. Stalk rot of corn. Proceedings 26th Annual Corn Sorghum Res. Conf. 26:148–164.Google Scholar
20.Pappelis, A. J. and Boone, L. V.. 1966. Effects of soil fertility on cell death in corn stalk tissue. Phytopathology 56:860–862.Google Scholar
21.Pappelis, A. J. and Katsanos, R. A.. 1969. Ear removal and cell death rate in stalk tissue. Phytopathology 59:129–131.Google Scholar
22.Pappelis, A. J. and Smith, F. G.. 1963. Relationship of water content and living cells to spread of Diplodia zeae in corn stalks. Phytopathology 53:1100–1105.Google Scholar
23.Pappelis, A. J. and Williams, J. R.. 1966. Patterns of cell death in the elongating corn stalks. Trans. Ill. State Acad. Sci. 59:195–198.Google Scholar
24.Schneider, R. W. and Pendery, W. E.. 1983. Stalk rot of corn: mechanism of predisposition by an early season water stress. Phytopathology 73:863–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Wysong, D. S. and Hooker, A. L.. 1966. Relation of soluble solids content and pith condition to Diplodia stalk rot in corn hybrids. Phytopathology 56:26–35.Google Scholar
26.Zuber, M. S. 1973. Evaluation of progress in selection for stalk quality. Proceedings 28th Annual Corn Sorghum Res. Conf. 28:110–122.Google Scholar
27.Zuber, M. S. and Kang, M. S.. 1978. Corn lodging slowed by sturdier stalks. Crops Soils 30(5)N:13–15.Google Scholar