Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T21:57:22.653Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An economic assessment of maintaining high phosphorus and potassium soil test levels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 1991

Craig Chase
Affiliation:
Extension Associate, Department of Economics, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011
Michael Duffy
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Economics, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011
John Webb
Affiliation:
Professors, Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011
Regis Voss
Affiliation:
Professors, Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011
Get access

Abstract

Phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) fertilization costs, yields, and economic returns associated with various P and K fertilization levels were evaluated on corn and soybeans in rotation in northeastern Iowa from 1979 to 1989. The treatments were 0, 20, and 40 lb P/acre and 0, 60, and 120 lb K/acre, in all nine combinations, plus the high rate (40+120) applied on alternate years. (The latter treatment applied, respectively, in odd or even years was averaged into one treatment.) The initial soil test levels averaged 57 pounds of P and 355 pounds ofK. The P-K treatments did not significantly explain the variation in corn or soybean yields. Net returns were found directly related to the cost of the treatment, so that the control treatment (0+0) achieved the highest returns. The cost of using the 20+60 treatment to maintain soil test levels in the high to very high range was $24/acre per year. Annual application of 40+120 cost $45/acre. A sufficiency approach to applying P and K could drastically reduce fertilizer costs for high-testing soils. Further research is needed to determine if recommendations from this approach can be lowered in some cases. Extension workers must continue to develop ways to aid farmers in realizing the usefulness of soil testing. Farmers must carefully evaluate their fertilization needs in conjunction with soil test results. Together, a more sustainable approach to P and K fertilization for corn and soybeans may be attained.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Duffy, M. 1990 and previous issues. Estimated costs of crop production in Iowa. Coop. Ext. Serv. Bull. FM-1712, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.Google Scholar
2. Hairston, J., Jones, W., McConnaughey, P., Marshall, L., and Gill, K.. 1990. Tillage and fertilizer management effects on soybean growth and yield on three Mississippi soils. J. Prod. Agric. 3:317323.Google Scholar
3. Hooker, M., Gwin, R., Herron, G., and Gallagher, P.. 1983. Effects of long-term annual applications of N and P on corn grain yields and soil chemical properties. Agron. J. 75:9499.Google Scholar
4. Miller, G. 1986. Establishing realistic yield goals. Coop. Ext. Serv. Bull. PM-1268, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.Google Scholar
5. Olson, R., Frank, K., Grabouski, P., and Rehm, G.. 1982. Economic and agronomic impacts of varied philosophies of soil testing. Agron. J. 74:492499.Google Scholar
6. Tisdale, S., Nelson, W., and Beaton, J.. 1985. Soil Fertility and Fertilizers. Fourth Edition. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York, New York.Google Scholar
7. Voss, R., and Agronomy Dept. Staff. 1982. General guide for fertilizer recommendations in Iowa. Coop. Ext. Serv. Bull. AG-65, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.Google Scholar