1 The Federalist No. 10 (J. Madison).Google Scholar

2 E. E. Schattschneider, The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America (New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1960).Google Scholar

3 I Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America, trans. Henry Reeve, rev. Francis Bowen, ed. Phillips Bradley, at 282 (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1945).Google Scholar

4 . Green, Thomas A., The Jury and the English Law of Homicide, 1200–1600, 74 Mich. L. Rev. 413 (1976).Google Scholar

5 . Scheflin, Alan W., Jury Nullification: The Right to Say No, 45 S. Cal. L. Rev. 168 (1972).Google Scholar

6 Harold M. Hyman & Catherine M. Tarrant, Aspects of American Trial Jury History, in Rita James Simon, ed., The Jury System in America: A Critical Overview 21, 37. (Beverly Hills, Cal.: Sage Publications, 1975).Google Scholar

7 Harry Kalven & Hans Zeisel, The American Jury 286 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, Phoenix Books, 1971).Google Scholar

8 Daniel Schorr, Thoughts on Serving in a Seat of Judgment, N.Y. Times, Apr. 25, 1974, at 39.Google Scholar

9 Quoted in William J. Chambliss & Robert B. Seidman, Law, Order, and Power 439 (Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 1971).Google Scholar

10 Patrick Devlin, The Enforcement of Morals 21 (London: Oxford University Press, 1965).Google Scholar

11 A. Lawrence Lowell, Public Opinion and Popular Government 242 (New York: Longmans, Green & Co., 1913).Google Scholar

12 Hayward R. Alker, Jr., Carl Hosticka, & Michael Mitchell, Jury Selection as a Biased Social Proc ess, 11 Law & Soc'y Rev. 9 (1976); Jon M. Van Dyke, Jury Selection Procedures: Our Uncertain Commit ment to Representative Panels (Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger Publishing Co., 1977).Google Scholar

13 . Dahl, Robert A., Decision-making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy maker, 6 J. Pub. L. 281 (1957).Google Scholar

14 Richard Funston, A Vital National Seminar: The Supreme Court in American Political Life 45 (Palo Alto, Cal.: Mayfield Publishing Co., 1978).Google Scholar

15 Oliver Wendell Holmes, Collected Legal Papers 237 (New York: Harcourt, Brace & Howe, 1920).Google Scholar

16 Rita J. Simon, The Jury: Its Role in American Society 147 (Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath & Co., Lexington Books, 1980).Google Scholar

17 Kalven & Zeisel, supra note 7, at 9–10, app. E (no. 3 in both forms of questionnaire), 55–58.Google Scholar

18 Id. at 116.Google Scholar

19 Id. at 495.Google Scholar

20 Id. at 286–97.Google Scholar

21 . Penrod, Steven & Hastie, Reid, Models of Jury Decision Making: A Critical Review, 86 Psychological Bull. 462 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

22 . Amato, Paul R., Juror-Defendant Similarity and the Assessment of Guilt in Politically Motivated Crimes, 31 Australian J. Psychology 79 (1979).Google Scholar

23 Hubert S. Feild & Leigh B. Bienen, Jurors and Rape: A Study in Psychology and Law 121 (Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books, 1980).Google Scholar

24 . Gerbasi, Kathleen Carrese, Zuckerman, Miron, & Reis, Harry T., Justice Needs a New Blindfold: A Review of Mock Jury Research, 84 Psychological Bull. 323, 342 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

25 . Balch, Robert et al., The Socialization of Jurors: The Voir Dire as a Rite of Passage, 4 J. Crim. Just. 271 (1976).Google Scholar

26 . Bridgeman, Diane L. & Marlow, David, Jury Decision Making: An Empirical Study Based on Actual Felony Trials, 64 J. Applied Psychology 91 (1979).Google Scholar

27 . Adler, Freda, Socioeconomic Factors Influencing Jury Verdicts, 3 N.Y.U. Rev. L.& SOC. Change 1 (1973); Cookie Stephan, Selective Characteristics of Jurors and Litigants: Their Influences on Juries' Verdicts, in Simon, ed., supra note 6, at 95; Carol J. Mills & Wayne E. Bohannon, Juror Characteristics: To What Extent Are They Related to Jury Verdicts? 64 Judicature 22 (1980).Google Scholar

28 John Baldwin & Michael McConvilie, Jury Trials (London: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press, 1979).Google Scholar

29 . Myers, Martha A., Rule Departures and Making Law: Juries and Their Verdicts, 13 Law & Soc'y Rev. 781 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

30 . Levine, James P., Using Jury Verdict Forecasts in Criminal Defense Strategy, 66 Judicature 448, 451 (1983).Google Scholar

31 . Cook, Beverly Blair, Sentencing Behavior of Federal Judges: Draft Cases– 1972, 41 U. Cin. L. Rev. 597 (1973); id., Public Opinion and Federal Judicial Policy, 21 Am. J. Pol. Sci. 567 (1977).Google Scholar

32 . The law provides that Selective Service classifications be considered “final.” 50 U.S.C. app. § 460 (b)(3) (Supp. IV, 1969). The Supreme Court has ruled that “final” means that the administrative classifications must be upheld by the courts unless they have “no basis in fact.” Estep v. United States, 327 33. Note, Prosecution for Selective Service Offenses: A Field Study, 22 Stan. L. Rev. 356 (1970).Google Scholar

33 . Loeb, Louis, The Courts and Vietnam, 18 Am. U.L. Rev. 378 (1969).Google Scholar

34 . Lunch, William L. & Sperlich, Peter W., American Public Opinion and the War in Vietnam, 32 W. POI. Q. 21, 23–24(1979).Google Scholar

35 . Converse, Philip E. & Schuman, Howard, “Silent Majorities” and the Vietnam War. 222 Sci. Am., June 1970, at 17, June 1970, at 17, 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

36 Annual Report of the Director is bound with Reports of the Proceedings of the Judicial conference of the United States. Federal Offenders in the United States District Courts, year], which began publication with fiscal year 1963, in some years of the past decade is actually published two or three years later than its title year and in some of its parts contains data for a year or more beyond the title year and for years before 1963 (e.g., table H 10, cited in note 53 infra, includes annual statistics from 1945). Each volume of Federal Offenders reprints in an appendix a group of tables from the Annual Report of the Director for the title year.Google Scholar

37 . Mueller, John E., Trends in Popular Support for the Wars in Korea and Vietnam, 65 Am. Pol. Sci. Rev. 358, 365, 359 (1971).Google Scholar

38 Lewis Coser, The Functions of Social Conflict (New York: Free Press, 1954); E. E. Schattschneider, Two Hundred Million Americans in Search of a Government 34–36 (New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. 1969).Google Scholar

39 Walter F. Murphy, Elements of Judicial Strategy 48–49 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1964).Google Scholar

40 Mueller, supra note 38, at 365–67.Google Scholar

41 The number of jury trials was only 14 in 1964 and 20 in 1965, so the possibility of idiosyncratic results stemming from statistical artifact looms large.Google Scholar

42 . Erskine, Hazel, The Polls: Is War a Mistake 34 Pub. Opinion Q. 134, 137 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

43 Lunch & Sperlich, supra note 35, at 29–30.Google Scholar

44 Id. at 25.Google Scholar

45 Van Dyke, supra note 12, at 28–35, 29–42.Google Scholar

46 Lunch & Sperlich, supra note 35, at 32–43; Milton J. Rosenberg, Sidney Verba, & Philip E. Converse, Vietnam and the Silent Majority: The Dove's Guide 73–77 (New York: Harper & Row, 1970).Google Scholar

47 Alker et al., supra note 12, at 10.Google Scholar

48 Lunch & Sperlich, supra note 35, at 41.Google Scholar

49 Martin A. Levin, Urban Politics and the Criminal Courts (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1977); John Paul Ryan, Adjudication and Sentencing in a Misdemeanor Court: The outcome Is the Punishment, 15 Law & Soc'y Rev. 79 (1980–81).Google Scholar

50 . Kritzer, Herbert M., Political Correlates of the Behavior of Federal District Judges: A “Best Case” Analysis, 40 J. Pol. 25 (1978).Google Scholar

51 . Id., Federal Judges and Their Political Environments: The Influence of Public Opinion, 23 Am. J. Pol. Sci. 194 (1979); Beverly Cook, Judicial Policy: Change over Time, 23 Am. J. Pol. Sci. 208 (1979).Google Scholar

52 The regional categorization of states used by the Survey Research Center of the University of Michigan (now called the Institute for Social Research) was employed in this study.Google Scholar

53 Rosenberg et al., supra note 47, at 77–78.Google Scholar

54 . In the initial stages of the Vietnam War the South, perhaps reflecting a tradition of isolationism, was actually less enthusiastic about the war than the rest of the nation. But this stance quickly changed as the war intensified. See Verba, Sidney et al., Public Opinion and the War in Vietnam, 61 Am. Pol. Sci. Rev. 317, 324–25(1967).Google Scholar

55 . Miller, Arthur H., et al., A Majority Party in Disarray: Policy Polarization in the 1972 Election, 70 Am. Pol. Sci. Rev. 753 (1976).Google Scholar

56 One caveat about this line of analysis is in order. It is possible that the increased number of selective service case filings in the late 1960s and early 1970s, perhaps resulting from the government's manpower needs, brought so many unjustified cases into the federal courts that even the high rate of dismissals failed to weed out a good number of illegitimate prosecutions brought mainly for purposes of harassment and deterrence.Google Scholar

57 The average sentence given to those convicted of selective service offenses went up from 21 months of imprisonment in 1965 to 37 months in 1968. Administrative Office of the United States Courts, Federal Offenders in the United States District Courts, 1972, at table H 10 (Washington, D.C.: Administrative office of the United States Courts, 1974).Google Scholar

58 . United States v. Seeger, 380 U.S. 163 (1965).Google Scholar

59 . Welsh v. United States, 398 U.S. 333 (1970).Google Scholar

60 . Asimow, Michael, Introduction: Selective Service 1970, 17 UCLA L. Rev. 893, 903 (1970).Google Scholar

61 . 401 U.S. 437 (1971).Google Scholar

62 . Beytagh, Francis X., Judicial Review in Selective Service Cases-Lessons from Vietnam, 48 Notre Dame Law. 1164 (1973).Google Scholar

63 Note, supra note 33, at 411–13.Google Scholar

64 . Cook, , Public Opinion and Federal Judicial Policy, supra note 31; Kritzer, supra note 51; Cook, supra note 52; John Hagan & Ilene N. Bernstein, Conflict in Context: The Sanctioning of Draft Resisters, 1963–76, 27 SOC. Probs. 109 (1979).Google Scholar

65 Sentencing Selective Service Violators: A Judicial Wheel of Fortune, Colum. J.L. & Soc. Probs., Aug. 1969, at 164, 164.Google Scholar

66 But this too is speculation, for the virtual elimination of all but the conscientious objector exemption could have meant that the pool of defendants no longer included very many men questioning other classifications, for which criteria were clearer and grounds for challenging an adverse selective service ruling were fewer. If a higher proportion of cases involved conscientious objector claims, perhaps a higher percentage of defendants had valid defenses to criminal charges.Google Scholar

67 . Miller, Walter B., Ideology and Criminal Justice Policy: Some Current Issues, 64 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 141, 142(1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

68 Herbert L. Packer, The Limits of the Criminal Sanction (Stanford, Cal.: Stanford University Press, 1968).Google Scholar

69 . 28 U.S.C. §§ 1821, 1861–1869(1982).Google Scholar

70 . Kairys, David, Kadane, Joseph H., & Lehoczhy, John P., Jury Representativeness: A Mandate for Multiple Source Lists, 65 Calif. L. Rev. 776 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

71 United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics-1980, at 196–97 (Washington, D.C.: Department of Justice. 1980).Google Scholar

72 . Levine, James P., Jury Toughness: The Impact of Conservatism on Criminal Court Verdicts, 29 Crime & Delinquency 71 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

73 Patrick Devlin, Trial by Jury 114 (London: Stevens & Sons. 1956).Google Scholar

74 Levine, supra note 30, at 451–52, 458–59.Google Scholar