Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T17:58:28.971Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Austin Ranney, ed., The Past and Future of Presidential Debates. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, 1979. Pp. [xii] + 226.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Lee M. Mitchell
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Information
American Bar Foundation Research Journal , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , Summer 1980 , pp. 607 - 614
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 1980 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 H. Rep. No. 464, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. 16 (1926).Google Scholar

2 Communications Act of 1934. 47 U.S.C. § 315 (1976) (originally enacted as Radio Act of 1927, ch. 169, 44 Stat. 1162).Google Scholar

3 See 47 C.F.R. § 73. 1940 (1979).Google Scholar

4 Zapple, Nicholas, 23 F.C.C.2d 707 (1970); The Law of Political Broadcasting and Cablecasting, 43 Fed. Reg. 36,342, 36, 390-91 (1978).Google Scholar

5 Pub. L. No. 86-677, Aug. 24, 1960, 74 Stat. 554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, Pub. L. No. 92-225, 2 U.S.C. § 431-455 (1976), 47 U.S.C. § 312(a)(7) (1976).Google Scholar

7 Aspen Institute Program on Communications and Society, 55 F.C.C.2d 697 (1975).Google Scholar

8 Pub. L. No. 86-274 § 1, 73 Stat. 557 (1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9 Chisholm v. FCC, 538 F.2d 349 (D.C. Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 890 (1976); see also Office of Communication of the United Church of Christ v. FCC, 590 F.2d 1062 (D.C. Cir. 1978).Google Scholar

10 Kraus, Sidney, ed., The Great Debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976 (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1979).Google Scholar

11 With the Nation Watching: Report of the Twentieth Century Fund Task Force on Televised Presidential Debates (Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath & Co., 1979).Google Scholar

12 Bishop, George F., Robert G. Meadow, & Marilyn Jackson-Beeck, eds., The Presidential Debates: Media, Electoral and Policy Perspectives (New York: Praeger Publishers, 1978).Google Scholar

13 Lloyd Bitzer & Theodore Rueter, Carter vs. Ford: The Counterfeit Debates of 1976 (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, forthcoming 1980).Google Scholar

14 Maddox, Lester, [1976] 38 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F) 873; Socialist Workers 1976 National Campaign Committee, 67 F.C.C.2d 182 (1976) (Broadcast Bureau), aff'd, FCC 76-875 (Sept. 22, 1976); American Independent Party, 62 F.C.C.2d 4 (1976). Anderson v. Ford, No. 76-1672 (D.D.C. Sept. 17, 1976) (orders denying motions for preliminary injunction and summary judgment), aff'd per curium, McCarthy v. Carter, No. 76-1865 (D.C. Cir. Sept. 22, 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 876 (1976). See also Socialist Workers Party v. United States, No. 76-1897 (D.C. Cir. Sept. 30, 1976) (aff'g per curium Socialist Workers Party, FCC 76-875), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 890 (1976); McCarthy v. FCC, No. 76-1915 (D.C. Cir.) (consolidated with McCarthy v. Carter, supra.)Google Scholar

15 2 U.S.C. § 441b(a) (1976).Google Scholar

16 11 C.F.R. §§ 100.7(b)(21), 110.13, 114.4(e) (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar