No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Harold J. Spaeth's Rebuttal
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 December 2018
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Book Reviews
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 1980
References
1. See text of review at pp. 618–19.Google Scholar
2. Id. at pp. 619–20.Google Scholar
3. Harold J. Spaeth & David J. Peterson, The Analysis and Interpretation of Dimensionality: The Case of Civil Liberties Decision Making, 15 Midwest J. Political Sci. 415 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. David W. Rohde & Harold J. Spaeth, Supreme Court Decision Making (San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Co., 1976).Google Scholar
5. Block writes, “Indeed, Spaeth's new book adds nothing to the decision model described in his 1976 Supreme Court Decision Making.” See text of review at p. 619.Google Scholar
6. See text of review at p. 625.Google Scholar
7. See note 5 of review.Google Scholar
8. Rohde & Spaeth, supra note 4, at 96 nn.19, 20.Google Scholar
9. Tanenhaus, Joseph, The Cumulative Scaling of Judicial Decisions, 79 Harv. L. Rev. 1583 (1966).Google Scholar
10. Spaeth, Harold J., Unidimensionality and Item Invariance in Judicial Scaling, 10 Behavioral Sci. 290 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. See text of review at pp. 620–21.Google Scholar
12. Spaeth, Harold J., Supreme Court Policy Making: Explanation and Prediction 153 (San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Co., 1979).Google Scholar
13. Id. Google Scholar
14. Rohde & Spaeth, supra note 4, at 157–68.Google Scholar
15. Spaeth & Peterson, supra note 3, at 438–41.Google Scholar
16. See text of review at pp. 624–26.Google Scholar
17. Spaeth, supra note 12, at 137.Google Scholar
18. Id. at 124.Google Scholar
19. See text of review at p. 625.Google Scholar
20. Id.Google Scholar