Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T18:01:23.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Worsaae's Law and the Use of Grave Lots for Archaeological Dating

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

John Howland Rowe
John Howland Rowe*
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley, California
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The principle that the objects accompanying a burial are in most cases things which were in use at the same time was first stated by J. J. A. Worsaae in 1843. This principle rests on several assumptions, among them that it was customary to place objects beside the dead only at the time of burial, and that the objects so placed were ones owned or used by the occupant or his friends at the time of his death. There is at least one area, the Andean sierra, where we have historical evidence for the renewal of offerings in tombs, and in some cases renewal may have continued periodically for as much as 200 years. In the light of this example it is clearly necessary to determine the burial customs prevailing in the area and period concerned before using grave associations as evidence for contemporaneity. There is also a number of special circumstances which may produce exceptions to the conditions assumed in Worsaae's Law, and to cover the possibility of such exceptions the archaeologist must work with a sufficient number of grave lots so that he can establish rules of consistent association and identify exceptions to them.

Worsaae's Law may be extended to state that the objects accompanying a burial were in most cases not only used at the same time but made within a few years of one another. Heirlooms and antiques, the kinds of objects which would not conform to this statement, can be expected to be rare enough so that they would be recognized as exceptions to the prevailing pattern of associations.

The evidence of contemporaneity which grave associations provide can be used in two ways. If no stylistic sequence has yet been established for an area, grave associations can serve to check hypothetical sequences suggested on the basis of external evidence. Grave associations provide no evidence of sequence as such, but they do provide a means of testing the validity of the stylistic units or phases which any sequence implies. If a stylistic sequence is already established, the evidence of grave lots can be used to extend it to kinds of materials not included in the original sequence. Fuller utilization of burial associations for both purposes could lead to the solution of many problems in archaeological dating.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 28 , Issue 2 , October 1962 , pp. 129 - 137
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bandelier, Adolph Francis Alphonse 1904 On the Relative Antiquity of Ancient Peruvian Burials. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, vol. XX, article XIX, June 16, pp. 217–226. New York.Google Scholar
Bibby, Thomas Geoffrey 1956 The Testimony of the Spade. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.Google Scholar
Bronsted, Johannes 1944 Worsaae, Jens Jacob Asmussen 1821-85, Arkaeolog. Dansk Biografisk Leksikon, vol. XXVI, pp. 303–313. J. H. Schutz Forlag, København.Google Scholar
Browne, Thomas 1658 Hydriotaphia, Urne-huriall, or a Discourse of the Sepulchrall Urnes lately Found in Norfolk … Hen. Brome, London.Google Scholar
Eaton, George Francis 1916 The Collection of Osteological Material from Machu Picchu. Memoirs of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences, vol. V. New Haven.Google Scholar
Foster, George McClelland 1960 Life-expectancy of Utilitarian Pottery in Tzintzuntzan, Michoacán, Mexico. American Antiquity, vol. 25, no. 4, April, pp. 606–609. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Goguet, Antoine Yves 1778 De I'origine des loix, des arts et des sciences, et de leurs progrès chex. les anciens peuples. Knapen, Libraire-Imprimeur, Paris. 6 vols.Google Scholar
Hermansen, Victor 1935 C. J. Thomsens f0rste Museumordning; et Bidrag til Tredelingens Historic Aarhoger for nordisk Oldkyndighed og Historie udgivne af det Kgl. nordiske Oldskrift-Selskab, 1934, 1. Halvbind, pp. 99–122. København.Google Scholar
Hermansen, Victor 1941 C. J. Thomsen and the Founding of the Ethnographical Museum. Ethnographical Studies, Published on the Occasion of the Centenary of the Ethnographical Department, National Museum. Nationalmuseets Skrifter, Etnografisk Raekke, I, pp. 11–27. København.Google Scholar
Hernández Principe, Rodrigo 1923 Mitología andina. Inca; revista trimestral de estudios anthropológics, vol. 1, no. 1, eneromarzo, pp. 25–68. Lima.Google Scholar
Keiller, Alexander, and Piggott, Stuart 1938 Excavation of an Untouched Chamber in the Lanhill Long Barrow. Proceedings of the Prehis' toric Society, n.s., vol. IV, part 1, Jan.-July, pp. 122–131. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kenyon, Kathleen Mary 1960 Archaeology in the Holy Land. Frederick A. Praeger, Publishers, New York.Google Scholar
Müller, Sophus Otto 1897–98 Nordische Altertumskunde, nach Funden und Denkmälern aus Dänemark und Schleswig gemeinfasslich dargestellt. Karl J. Trübner, Strassburg. 2 vols.Google Scholar
Mylonas, George Emmanuel 1948 Homeric and Mycenaean Burial Customs. American Journal of Archaeology, vol. LI, no. 1, January-March, pp. 56–81. Menasha.Google Scholar
Mylonas, George Emmanuel 1961 Eleusis and the Eleusinian Mysteries. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
Petersen, Carl Sophus 1938 Stenalder, Broncealder, Jernalder; Bidrag til nordisk Arkaeologis Litteraerhistorie, 1776-1865. Levin & Munksgaard, Ejnar Munksgaard, København.Google Scholar
Petersen, Niels Matthias, and Thomsen, Christian Jürgensen 1836 Ledetraad til nordisk Oldkyndighed. Det Kongelige nordiske Oldskrift-Selskab, København.Google Scholar
Petrie, William Matthew Flinders 1904 Methods & Aims in Archaeology. Macmillan and Co., Limited, London; The Macmillan Company, New York.Google Scholar
Rowe, John Howland 1959 Archaeological Dating and Cultural Process. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, vol. 15, no. 4, Winter, pp. 317–324. Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Rowe, John Howland 1961a The Chronology of Inca Wooden Cups. Essays in Pre-Columbian Art and Archaeology, by Lothrop, Samuel K. and others, pp. 317–341. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rowe, John Howland 1961b Stratigraphy and Sedation. American Antiquity, vol. 26, no. 3, January, pp. 324–330. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Stemmermann, Paul Hans 1934 Die Anfänge der deutschen Vorgeschichtsforschung. Deutschlands Bodenaltertümer in der Anschauung des 16. u. 17. Jahrhunderts. Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung der Doktorwiirde einer hohen philosophischen Fakultat an der Ruprechr-Karls Universitat zu Heidelberg. Handelsdruckerei C. Trute, Quakenbrück i. Hann.Google Scholar
Suhm, Peter Frederik 1776 Historien af Danemark, Norge og Holsten udi tvende Udtog til den studerende Ungdoms Bedste. København.Google Scholar
Uhle, Max 1944 The Aims and Results of Archaeology. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 54–100. Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Woolley, Charles Leonard 1928 The Sumerians. The Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Worsaae, Jens Jakob Asmussen 1839 Efterretning om Undersögelsen af to Steendysser i Veibye Sogn. Annaler for nordisk Oldkyndighed udgivne af det Kongelige nordiske Oldskrift-Selskab, 1838–1839, pp. 170–176. Kjöbenhavn.Google Scholar
Worsaae, Jens Jakob Asmussen 1843 Danmarks Oldtid oplyst ved Oldsager og Gravhaie. Selskabet for Trykkefrihedens rette Brug, Kjøbenhavn.Google Scholar
Worsaae, Jens Jakob Asmussen 1844 Dänemarks Vorzeit durch Alterthümer und Grabhüugel beleuchtet. Aus dem danischen übersetzt von N. Bertelsen. Verlag von C. A. Reitzel, Universitarsbuchhändler, Køpenhagen.Google Scholar
Worsaae, Jens Jakob Asmussen 1849 The Primeval Antiquities of Denmark. Translated, and applied to the illustration of similar remains in England, by Thorns, William J.. John Henry Parker, London and Oxford.Google Scholar