Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:44:20.713Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

There Is No Cherokee Syllabary at Red Bird River Shelter (15CY52): Reply to Tankersley and Weeks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2020

Jan F. Simek ,
Beau Duke Carroll ,
Julie Reed ,
Alan Cressler ,
Tom Belt ,
Wayna Adams  and
Mary White
Jan F. Simek*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, 502 Strong Hall, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN37996, USA
Beau Duke Carroll
Affiliation:
Tribal Historic Preservation Office, Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians, Cherokee, NC, USA
Julie Reed
Affiliation:
Department of History, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA16802, USA; and Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma, Tahlequah, OK, USA
Alan Cressler
Affiliation:
1790 Pennington Place SE, Atlanta, GA, USA
Tom Belt
Affiliation:
Cherokee Language Program, Western Carolina University, Cullowhee, NC, USA (Ret.); and United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians in Oklahoma, Tahlequah, OK, USA
Wayna Adams
Affiliation:
Daniel Boone National Forest, Winchester, KY, USA
Mary White
Affiliation:
Daniel Boone National Forest, London, KY, USA
*
([email protected], corresponding author)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Despite new arguments by Tankersley and Weeks that we misinterpreted petroglyph engravings and ignored site formation processes at the Red Bird River Shelter in Kentucky (15CY52), we remain convinced that there is no evidence for Cherokee Syllabary writing at the site. The petroglyphs are clearly not symbols present in any version of the Cherokee Syllabary. There is no empirical evidence for any site formation processes that have altered the shelter or its petroglyphs in the ways they suggest. There is still no evidence that Sequoyah ever spent any time in the vicinity of Red Bird River Shelter.

Pesar de los nuevos argumentos de Tankersley y Weeks de que malinterpretamos los grabados de petroglifos e ignoramos los procesos de formación del sitio en el Red Bird River Shelter en Kentucky (15CY52), seguimos convencidos de que no hay evidencia de la escritura del Syllabario Cherokee en el sitio. Los petroglifos claramente no son símbolos presentes en ninguna versión del Syllabario Cherokee. No hay evidencia empírica de ningún proceso de formación del sitio que haya alterado el refugio o sus petroglifos en las formas que sugieren. Todavía no hay evidencia de que Sequoyah haya pasado algún tiempo cerca de Red Bird River Shelter.

Keywords

Cherokee SyllabaryKentuckyRed Bird River ShelterSyllabario CherokeeKentuckyRed Bird River Shelter
Type
Comments
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 85 , Issue 2 , April 2020 , pp. 388 - 391
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 by the Society for American Archaeology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Adams, Mikaela M. 2016 Who Belongs? Race, Resources, and Tribal Citizenship in the Native South. Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bender, Margaret 2002 Signs of Cherokee Culture: Sequoyah's Syllabary in Eastern Cherokee Life. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Carroll, Beau D., Alan Cressler, Tom Belt, Reed, Julie, and Simek, Jan F. 2019 Talking Stones: Cherokee Syllabary in Manitou Cave, Alabama. Antiquity 93:519–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coy, Fred E., Fuller, Thomas C., Meadows, Larry G., and Swauger, James L. 1997 Rock Art of Kentucky. University Press of Kentucky, Lexington.Google Scholar
Cushman, Ellen 2011 The Cherokee Syllabary: Writing the People's Perseverance. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.Google Scholar
Echo-Hawk, Roger C. 2000 Ancient History in the New World: Integrating Oral Traditions and the Archaeological Record. American Antiquity 65:267–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoig, Stan 1995 Sequoyah: The Cherokee Genius. Oklahoma Historical Society, Oklahoma City.Google Scholar
McLoughlin, William G. 1995 Cherokees and Missionaries: 1789–1839. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.Google Scholar
Perdue, Theda 1994 The Sequoyah Syllabary and Cultural Revitalization. In Perspectives on the Southeast: Linguistics, Archaeology, and Ethnohistory, edited by Kwachka, Patricia B., pp. 116–125. University of Georgia Press, Athens.Google Scholar
Perdue, Theda, and Green, Michael D. 2007 The Cherokee Nation and the Trail of Tears. Penguin Books, New York.Google Scholar
Simek, Jan F., Carroll, Beau D., Reed, Julie, Cressler, Alan, Belt, Tom, Adams, Wayna, and White, Mary 2019 The Redbird River Shelter (15CY52) Revisited: The Archaeology of the Cherokee Syllabary and of Sequoyah in Kentucky. American Antiquity 84:302–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturm, Circe 2011 Becoming Indian: The Struggle over Cherokee Identity in the Twenty-First Century. SAR Press, Santa Fe, New Mexico.Google Scholar
Weeks, Rex, and Tankersley, Ken B. 2011 Talking Leaves and Rocks That Teach: The Archaeological Discovery of Sequoyah's Oldest Written Record. Antiquity 85:978–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitley, Peter M. 2002 Archaeology and Oral Tradition: The Scientific Importance of Dialogue. American Antiquity 67:405–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Simek et al. supplementary material

Simek et al. supplementary material

Download Simek et al. supplementary material(File)
File 42.6 MB