Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T09:17:57.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Statistical Technique for Classifying Human Skeletal Remains

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

T. W. McKern  and
E. H. Munro
T. W. McKern
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin, Tex.
E. H. Munro
Affiliation:
Quartermaster Research and Engineering Center, Natick, Mass.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Arecurring question posed to the physical anthropologist by his archaeological associates concerns the problem of properly classifying new skeletal finds within the framework of a known local prehistory. An analysis may result which is initially purely quantitative. However, problems demanding interpretation often develop. For example, when the physical characteristics of prehistoric populations have been metrically described, their industrial accomplishments outlined, and their place in time fairly well established, the problem of spatial distribution becomes a primary interest. The discovery of skeletal material, peripheral to the known area of occupation, must be explained either as an addition to the known biological pattern or as representing a foreign element.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 24 , Issue 4Part1 , April 1959 , pp. 375 - 382
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1959

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnard, M. M. 1935 The Secular Variation of Skull Characteristics in Four Series of Egyptian Skulls. Annals of Eugenics, Vol. 6, pp. 352–71. London.Google Scholar
Bronowski, J. and Long, W. M. 1952 Statistics of Discrimination in Anthropology. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, Vol. 10, pp. 385–94. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Cox, G. M. and Martin, W. P. 1937 Use of a Discriminant Function for Differentiating Soils with Different Azotobacter Populations. Iowa State College Journal of Science, Vol. 11, pp. 323–31. Ames.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. 1936 The Use of Multiple Measurements in Taxonomic Problems. Annals of Eugenics, Vol. 7, pp. 179–88. London.Google Scholar
Freeman, L. C. and Merriam, A. P. 1956 Statistical Classification on Anthropology. American Anthropologist, Vol. 58, pp. 464–71. Menasha.Google Scholar
Gifford, E. W. 1926 Californian Anthropometry. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, Vol. 22, pp. 217–390. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Goulden, C. H. 1956 Methods of Statistical Analysis, second edition. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Johnson, P. O. 1949 Statistical Methods in Research. Prentice Hall, New York.Google Scholar
Kendall, M. G. 1948 The Advanced Theory of Statistics, Vol. 2. Charles Griffin, London.Google Scholar
McKern, T. W. 1955 An Anthropometric and Morphological Analysis of a Prehistoric Skeletal Population from Santa Cruz Island, California. MS, thesis, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Neumann, G. K. 1952 Archeology and Race in the American Indian. In Archeology of Eastern United States, edited by Griffin, J. B., pp. 13–34. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Newman, R. W. 1957 A Comparative Analysis of Prehistoric Skeletal Remains from the Lower Sacramento Valley. Reports of the University of California Archaeological Survey, No. 39. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Olson, R. L. 1930 Chumash Prehistory. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, Vol. 28, pp. 1–21. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Panse, V. G. 1946 An Application of the Discriminant Function for Selection in Poultry. Journal of Genetics, Vol. 47, pp. 242–8. London.Google Scholar
Pons, J. 1955 The Sexual Diagnosis of Isolated Bones of the Skeleton. Human Biology, Vol. 27, pp. 12–21. Detroit.Google Scholar
Rao, G. R. 1952 Advanced Statistical Methods in Biometric Research. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Smith, H. F. 1936 A Discriminant Function for Plant Selection. Annals of Eugenics, Vol. 7, pp. 240–50. London.Google Scholar
Thieme, F. P. 1957 Sex in Negro Skeletons. Journal of Forensic Medicine, Vol. 4, pp. 72–81. Cape Town.Google Scholar
Thieme, F. P. and Schull, W. J. 1957 Sex Determination from the Skeleton. Human Biology, Vol. 29, pp. 242–73. Detroit.Google Scholar