Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T13:25:38.195Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Uses of R-Mode Analysis in Archaeology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

D. E. Dumond
D. E. Dumond*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Oregon
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

One kind of R-mode analysis, the examination of the co-occurrence of particular artifact classes across a number of collections, facilitates the identification of recurrent artifact clusters. Its use with proportional data, however, requires the safeguard of equalizing collection sizes, which in turn may necessitate the use of some statistic other than the product-moment coefficient of correlation. Two examples of R-mode analysis are given, both using an average-linkage clustering procedure. The first uses proportional data from unmixed collections of a southwestern Alaskan phase of the Arctic Small Tool tradition, permitting a definition of artifact groups that may represent specialized activities, and highlighting 1 cluster that may have specifically temporal significance; some results of factor analysis are compared. The second example employs presence-absence information from surface-collected ceramics from Tlaxcala, Mexico, and makes possible a refinement of the ceramic sequence.

Type
Articles
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 39 , Issue 2Part1 , April 1974 , pp. 253 - 270
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benfer, Robert A. 1967 A design for the study of archeological characteristics. American Anthropologist 69:719–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binford, Lewis R. 1972 Model building-paradigms, and the current state of Paleolithic research. In An archaeological perspective, edited by Binford, L. R., pp. 244–294. Seminar Press, New York.Google Scholar
Binford, Lewis R., and Sally R.|Binford 1966 A preliminary analysis of functional variability in the Mousterian of Levallois facies. In Recent studies in paleoanthropology, edited by Clark, J. D. and Howell, F. C.. American Anthropologist 68(2.2):238–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonham-Carter, G. F. 1967 Fortran IV program for Q-mode cluster analysis of nonquantitative data using IBM 7090 computers. State Geological Survey Computer Contribution 17. University of Kansas, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Cattell, Raymond B. 1952 Factor analysis. Harper and Brothers, New York.Google Scholar
Chayes, F. 1960 On correlation between variables of constant sum. Journal of Geophysical Research 65:4185–4193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chayes, F. 1962 Numerical correlation and petrographic variation. Journal of Geology 70:440–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chayes, F. 1971 Ratio correlation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Cowgill, George L. 1968 Archaeological applications of factor, cluster, and proximity analysis. American Antiquity 33:367–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowgill, George L. 1970 Some sampling and reliability problems in archaeology. In Archeologie et Calculateurs: Problemes semiologiques et mathematiques, pp. 161–172. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris.Google Scholar
Dempsey, Paul, and Baumhoff, Martin 1963 The statistical use of artifact distributions to establish chronological sequence. American Antiquity 28:496–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Driver, Harold E. 1965 Survey of numerical classification in anthropology. In The Use of Computers in Anthropology , edited by Hymes, Dell, pp. 301–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumond, D. E. 1963 Two early phases from the Naknek drainage. Arctic Anthropology 1(2):93–104.Google Scholar
Dumond, D. E. 1971 A summary of archaeology in the Katmai region, southwestern Alaska. University of Oregon Anthropological Papers 2. Google Scholar
Dumond, D. E. 1972 Demographic aspects of the Classic period in Puebla-Tlaxcala. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 28:101–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumond, D. E., and Muller, Florencia 1972 Classic to Postclassic in highland central Mexico. Science 171:1208–1215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, Leslie G. Jr., and Brown, James A. 1964 Statistical analysis of Carter Ranch pottery. In Chapters in the prehistory of eastern Arizona, II, edited by Martin, Paul S. and others. Fieldiana: Anthropology 55:126–154.Google Scholar
Freeman, Leslie G., Brown, James A., and Stuart Thomas 1968 Alternate approaches to a multivariate analysis of archaeological materials. Unpublished paper read at the 33rd Annual Meeting, Society for American Archaeology, Santa Fe, New Mexico.Google Scholar
Goodman, Leo A., and William H.|Kruskal 1954 Measures of associations for cross classifications. Journal of the American Statistical Association 49:732–764.Google Scholar
Hill, James N. 1970 Broken K Pueblo: prehistoric social organization in the American Southwest. University of Arizona A n thropological Papers 18.Google Scholar
Hodson, F. R. 1969 Classification by computer. In Science in Archaeology, edited by Brothwell, Don and Higgs, Eric, pp. 649–660. Thames and Hudson, London.Google Scholar
Hodson, F. R. 1970 Cluster analysis and archaeology: some new developments and applications. World Archaeology 1:299–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, LeRoy Jr., 1968 Item seriation as an aid for elementary scale and cluster analysis. University of Oregon Museum of Natural History, Bulletin 15.Google Scholar
Jorgensen, Joseph G. 1969 Salish language and culture. Indiana University, Language Science Monographs 3.Google Scholar
Krumbein, W. C. 1962 Open and closed number systems in stratigraphic mapping. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 46:2229–2245.Google Scholar
Longacre, William A. 1970 Archaeology as anthropology: a case study. University of Arizona Anthropological Papers 17.Google Scholar
Mueller, John H., and Schuessler, Karl F. 1961 Statistical reasoning in sociology. Houghton Mifflin, Boston.Google Scholar
Nie, Norman H., Bent, Dale H., and Hadlai Hull, C. 1970 Statistical package for the social sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Robinson, W. S. 1951 A method for chronologically ordering archaeological deposits. American Antiquity 16:293–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sackett, James R. 1966 Quantitative analysis of Upper Paleolithic stone tools. In Recent studies in paleoanthropology, edited by Clark, J. D. and Howell, F. C.. American Anthropologist 68:356–394.Google Scholar
Snow, Dean R. 1966 A seriation of archaeological collections from the Rio Zahuapan drainage, Tlaxcala, Mexico. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Oregon. University Microfilms 66-12, 984, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Snow, Dean R. 1969 Ceramic sequence and settlement location in pre-Hispanic Tlaxcala. American Antiquity 34:131–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokal, Robert R., and Sneath, Peter H. A. 1963 Principles of numerical taxonomy. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Spaulding, Albert C. 1953 Statistical techniques for the discovery of artifact types. American Antiquity 18:305–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, William 1953 The study of behavior: Q-technique and its methodology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Thomas, David H. 1971 On the use of cumulative curves and numerical taxonomy. American Antiquity 36:206–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
True, D. L., and Matson, R. G. 1970 Cluster analysis and multidimensional scaling of archeological sites in northern Chile. Science 169:1201–1203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tugby, Donald J. 1965 Archaeological objectives and statistical methods: a frontier in archaeology. American Antiquity 31:1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar