Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T06:47:48.396Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Significance of Differences between Radiocarbon Dates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Albert C. Spaulding*
Affiliation:
University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan

Extract

Presumably all archaeologists know that radiocarbon dates are estimates of true dates, or, more precisely, that they are derived from estimates of the true rate of emission of electrons from radioactive carbon. If it were possible to keep each specimen in the counter for an indefinitely long period or if the emissions occurred with the regularity of clock ticks, there would be no need to talk of estimates of rates. Unfortunately, the emissions do not occur at regular intervals nor is it practical to count for a very long time, so there is no escape from the uncertainty of estimation.

Type
Facts and Comments
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Crane, H.R. 1951 Dating of Relics by Radiocarbon Analysis. Nucleonics, Vol. 9, No. 6, pp. 1623. New York.Google Scholar
Crane, H.R. 1956 University of Michigan Radiocarbon Dates I. Science, Vol. 124, No. 3224, pp. 664–72. Lancaster.Google Scholar
Johnson, Frederick (Assembler) 1951 Radiocarbon Dating. Memoirs of the Society for American Archaeology, No. 8. Salt Lake City.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Libby, W. F. 1954 Chicago Radiocarbon Dates V. Science, Vol. 120, No. 3123, pp. 733–42. Lancaster.Google Scholar