Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-68cz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-12T09:43:46.872Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reconsidering Paleoarchaic Mobility in the Central Great Basin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

George T. Jones ,
Lisa M. Fontes ,
Rachel A. Horowitz ,
Charlotte Beck  and
David G. Bailey
George T. Jones
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Hamilton College, Clinton, New York 13323
Lisa M. Fontes
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico
Rachel A. Horowitz
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana
Charlotte Beck
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Hamilton College, Clinton, New York 13323
David G. Bailey
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences, Hamilton College, Clinton, New York
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Analyzing technological patterns and source provenance of stone tools, Jones, Beck, Jones, and Hughes (2003) argue that Paleoarchuic groups of the central Great Basin moved within an extensive home range, perhaps reaching 400 km in its longest dimension. The Eastern Conveyance Zone, as they refer to this territory, was aligned with the predominantly north-south trending mountains and valleys of the province. To evaluate this model of mobility, artifacts were collected from the southern part of the Eastern Conveyance Zone for geochemical characterizations. X-ray fluorescence spectrometry of 183 obsidian and fine-grained volcanic artifacts identified 12 known rock sources, all from the southern and central sections of the zone. No northern sources are represented among artifacts studied. Revisions of the Eastern Conveyance Zone model are considered in light of these results.

Resumen

Resumen

Mediante el análisis de los patrones tecnológicos y de la procedencia de las herramientas de piedra, Jones y otros (2003) sostienen que los grupos Paleoarcaicos de la Gran Cuenca Central se movieron en un amplio radio que podría haber llegado a alcanzar un máximo de 400 Kms. La Zona Este de Transmisión, como se refieren a este territorio, estaba alineada con las montañas y valles de la provincia orientada predominantemente en dirección nortesur. Para evaluar este modelo de movilidad, se recogieron artefactos de la parte sur de la Zona Este de Transmisión para proceder a su caracterización geo-química. hafluo-rescencia espectométrica de los rayos X de 183 obsidianas y artefactos volcánicos de grano fino, identificó 12 fuentes de rocas conocidas, todas de las secciones centro y sur de la zona. Entre los artefactos estudiados, no hay representada ninguna fuente del norte. A la luz de estos resultados, parece oportuno considerar hacer observaciones de la Zona de Trabajo Este.

Type
Reports
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 77 , Issue 2 , April 2012 , pp. 351 - 367
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

References Cited

Amick, Daniel S. 1996 Regional Patterns of Folsom Mobility and Land Use in the American Southwest. World Archaeology 27:411–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arkush, Brook S., and Pitblado, Bonnie L. 2000 Paleoarchaic Surface Assemblages in the Great Salt Lake Desert, Northwestern Utah. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 22:12–42.Google Scholar
Bamforth, Douglas B. 2002 High-Tech Foragers? Folsom and Later Paleoindian Technology on the Great Plains. Journal of World Prehistory 16:55–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Charlotte 2012 The Clovis-Last Hypothesis: Investigating Early Lithic Technology in the Intermountain West. In Meetings at the Margins: Prehistoric Cultural Interactions in the Intermountain West, edited by David Rhode, pp. 23–46. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Beck, Charlotte, and Jones, George T. 1990 The Late Pleistocene/Early Holocene Archaeology of Butte Valley, Nevada: Three Seasons’ Work. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 12:231–261.Google Scholar
Beck, Charlotte, and Jones, George T. 2009 The Archaeology of the Eastern Nevada Paleoarchaic, Part 1: The Sunshine Locality. University of Utah Anthropological Papers, No. 126. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Beck, Charlotte, and Jones, George T. 2011 The Role of Mobility and Exchange in the Conveyance of Toolstone During the Great Basin Paleoarchaic. In Perspectives on Prehistoric Trade and Exchange in California and the Great Basin, edited by Richard E. Hughes, pp. 55–82. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Beck, Charlotte, and Jones, George T. 2012 The Clovis-Last Hypothesis: Investigating Early Lithic Technology in the Intermountain West. In Meetings at the Margins: Prehistoric Cultural Interactions in the Intermountain West, edited by David Rhode, pp. 23–46. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Beck, Charlotte, Taylor, Amanda, Jones, George T., Fadem, Cynthia M., Cook, Caitlyn R., and Millward, Sara A. 2002 Rocks are Heavy: Transport Costs and Paleoarchaic Quarry Behavior in the Great Basin. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 21:481–507.Google Scholar
Binford, Lewis R. 1980 Willow Smoke and Dog’s Tails: Hunter-Gatherer Settlement Systems and Archaeological Site Formation. American Antiquity 45:4–20.Google Scholar
Brantingham, P. Jeffrey 2003 A Neutral Model of Stone Raw Material Procurement. American Antiquity 68:487–509.Google Scholar
Busby, Colin I. 1978 The Prehistory and Human Ecology of Garden and Coal Valley, Southeastern Nevada. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Busby, Colin I. 1979 The Prehistory and Human Ecology of Garden and Coal Valleys: A Contribution to the Prehistory of Southeastern Nevada. Archaeological Research Facility Contribution Number 39, Department of Anthropology. University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Duke, Daron G., and Craig Young, D. 2007 Episodic Permanence in Paleoarchaic Basin Selection and Settlement. In Paleoindian or Paleoarchaic? Great Basin Human Ecology at the Pleistocene-Holocene Transition, edited by Kelly E. Graf and Dave N. Schmitt, pp. 123–138. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Elston, Robert G. 1994 Prehistoric Strategies for Living Behind Argenta Rim. In Behind the Argenta Rim: Prehistoric Land Use in Whirlwind Valley and the Northern Shoshone Range, edited by Robert G. Elston and Margaret Bullock. BLM Cultural Resources Report No. 6–1513–1. Report prepared for Bureau of Land Management, Battle Mountain District on behalf of Santa Fe Pacific Gold Corporation by Inter-mountain Research, Silver City, Nevada.Google Scholar
Elston, Robert G., and Zeanah, David W. 2002 Thinking Outside the Box: A New Perspective on Diet Breadth and Sexual Division of Labor in the Prearchaic Great Basin. World Archaeology 34:103–130.Google Scholar
Estes, Mark B. 2009 Paleoindian Occupations in the Great Basin: A Comparative Study of Lithic Technological Organization, Mobility, and Landscape Use from Jakes Valley, Nevada. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of Nevada, Reno.Google Scholar
Goebel, Ted 2007 Pre-Archaic and Early Archaic Technological Activities at Bonneville Estates Rockshelter: A First Look at the Lithic Artifact Record. In Paleoindian or Paleoarchaic? Great Basin Human Ecology at the Pleistocene-Holocene Transition, edited by Kelly E. Graf and Dave N. Schmitt, pp. 156–184. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Goebel, Ted, Graf, Kelly, Hockett, Bryan, and Rhode, David 2007 The Paleoindian Occupations of Bonneville Estates Rockshelter, Danger Cave, and Smith Creek Cave (eastern Great Basin, U.S.A.): Interpreting Their Radiocarbon Chronologies. In On Shelter’s Ledge: Histories, Theories and Methods of Rockshelter Research, edited by Marcel Kornfeld, Sergey Vasil’ev, and Laura Miotti, pp. 147–161. BAR International Series, Archaeopress, Oxford.Google Scholar
Goodyear, Albert C. 1989 A Hypothesis for the Use of Cryptocrystalline Raw Material Among Paleoindian Groups in North America. In Eastern Paleoindian Lithic Resource Use, edited by Christopher J. Ellis and Jonathan C. Lothrop, pp. 1–9. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
Graf, Kelly E. 2001 Paleoindian Technological Provisioning in the Western Great Basin. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Department of Anthropology and Ethnic Studies, University of Nevada, Reno.Google Scholar
Graf, Kelly E. 2007 Stratigraphy and Chronology of the Pleistocene to Holocene Transition at Bonneville Estates Rockshelter, Eastern Great Basin. In Paleoindian or Paleoarchaic? Great Basin Human Ecology at the Pleistocene-Holocene Transition, edited by Kelly E. Graf and Dave N. Schmitt, pp. 82–104. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Grayson, D. K. 1993 The Desert’s Past: A Natural Prehistory of the Great Basin. Smithsonian Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Hughes, Richard E. 2002 Geochemical Research Laboratory Report on Source Analysis. In Analysis of Artifacts from the Old River Bed Delta, Dugway Proving Ground, Utah, edited by George T. Jones, Charlotte Beck, and Rebecca A. Kessler, Appendix A, pp. 1–3. Manuscript on file, Directorate of Environmental Programs, U.S. Army Dugway Proving Ground, Utah.Google Scholar
Hughes, Richard E. 2005 Determination of the Geologic Sources for Obsidian Artifacts from Camels Back Cave, and Trace Element Analysis of Some Western Utah and Eastern Nevada Volcanic Glasses. In Camels Back Cave, by Dave N. Schmitt and David B. Madsen, pp. 249–256. University of Utah Anthropological Papers, No. 125. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Jones, George T. 2008 Archaeological Field Studies in East-Central Nevada. Manuscript on file, Bureau of Land Management, Ely Field Office, Ely, Nevada.Google Scholar
Jones, George T., Bailey, David G., and Beck, Charlotte 1997 Source Provenance of Andesite Artifacts using Non-Destructive XRF Analysis. Journal of Archaeological Science 24:929–943.Google Scholar
Jones, George. T., and Beck, Charlotte 1999 Paleoarchaic Archaeology in the Great Basin. In Models for the Millennium: Great Basin Anthropology Today, edited by Charlotte Beck, pp. 83–95. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Jones, George T., Beck, Charlotte, Jones, Eric E., and Hughes, Richard E. 2003 Lithic Source Use and Paleoarchaic Foraging Territories in the Great Basin. American Antiquity 68:5–38.Google Scholar
Layton, Thomas 1979 Archaeology and Paleo-ecology of Pluvial Lake Parman, Northwestern Great Basin. Journal of New World Archaeology 3:41–56.Google Scholar
Madsen, David B. 2007 The Paleoarchaic to Archaic Transition in the Great Basin. In Paleoindian or Paleoarchaic: Great Basin Human Ecology at the Pleistocene-Holocene Transition, edited by Kelly E. Graf and Dave N. Schmitt, pp. 3–20. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Page, David 2008 Fine-Grained Volcanic Toolstone Sources and Early Use in the Bonneville Basin of Western Utah and Eastern Nevada. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of Nevada, Reno.Google Scholar
Seeman, Mark F. 1994 Intercluster Lithic Patterning at Nobles Pond: A Case for “Disembedded” Procurement among Early Paleoindian Societies. American Antiquity 59:273–288.Google Scholar
Shackley, M. Steven 2010 Is There Reliability and Validity in Portable X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry (PXRF)? The SAA Archaeological Record 10(5): 17–20.Google Scholar
Smith, Geoffrey M. 2007 Pre-Archaic Mobility and Technological Activities at the Parman Localities, Humboldt County, Nevada. In Paleoindian or Paleoarchaic? Great Basin Human Ecology at the Pleistocene-Holocene Transition, edited by Kelly E. Graf and Dave N. Schmitt, pp. 139–155. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Smith, Geoffrey M. 2010 Footprints across the Black Rock: Temporal Variability in Prehistoric Foraging Territories and Toolstone Procurement Strategies in the Western Great Basin. American Antiquity 75:865–885.Google Scholar
Tankersley, Kenneth B., Smith, Edward E., and Cochran, Donald R. 1990 Early Paleoindian Land Use, Mobility, and Lithic Exploitation Patterns: An Updated Distribution of Fluted Points in Indiana. North American Archaeologist 11:301–319.Google Scholar
Tuohy, Donald R. 1984 Implications of Obsidian Hydration Readings and Source Determinations for 28 Presumed “Early Man” Points from Nevada. In Obsidian Studies in the Great Basin, edited by Richard E. Hughes, pp. 193–221. Contributions of the University of California Archaeological Research Facility, No. 45, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Tuohy, Donald. R., and Layton, Thomas N. 1977 Towards the Establishment of a New Series of Great Basin Projectile Points. Nevada Archaeological Survey Reporter 10(6): 1–5.Google Scholar
Witthoft, John 1952 A Paleo-Indian Site in Eastern Pennsylvania: An Early Hunting Culture. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 96:464–495.Google Scholar