Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T14:02:55.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Quantitative Approach to the Petrographic Analysis of Ceramic Thin Sections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

James B. Stoltman
James B. Stoltman*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper introduces a new technique for the quantitative analysis of ceramic thin sections through petrography. The technique is a version of point counting that estimates with considerable precision the amounts of human additives (temper) and natural inclusions (silt and sand) in ceramic pastes. In concert with traditional qualitative identification of mineral inclusions, this technique expands the capacity of petrography to shed meaningful light on such topics in ceramic analysis as technology, production, trade, and classification. To demonstrate the utility of the technique it is used to reassess the taxonomic status of the type Spring Hollow Incised. The results conclusively show that Spring Hollow Incised is much more closely related to a newly defined Early Woodland ceramic assemblage in the Upper Mississippi Valley region than to the Middle Woodland Linn ware to which it originally was assigned.

Type
Reports
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 54 , Issue 1 , January 1989 , pp. 147 - 160
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Bayly, M. B. 1960 Errors in Point-Counter Analysis. The American Mineralogist 45 : 447–449.Google Scholar
Benchley, E., Gregg, M., and Dudzik, M. J. 1977 Recent Investigations at Albany Mounds, Whiteside County, Illinois. Circular No. 2. Illinois Archaeological Survey, University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana.Google Scholar
Benn, D. W. 1978 The Woodland Ceramic Sequence in the Culture History of Northeastern Iowa. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 3 : 215–283.Google Scholar
Benn, D. W. 1979 Some Trends and Traditions in Woodland Cultures of the Quad-State Region in the Upper Mississippi River Basin. The Wisconsin Archaeologist 60 : 47–82.Google Scholar
Bishop, R. L. 1980 Aspects of Ceramic Compositional Modeling. In Models and Methods in Regional Exchange, edited by Fry, R. E., pp. 47–65. SAA Papers No. 1. Society for American Archaeology, Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
Bishop, R. L., Rands, R. L., and Holley, G. R. 1982 Ceramic Compositional Analysis in Archaeological Perspective. In Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 5, edited by Schiffer, M. B., pp. 275–330. Academic Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, D. P. 1982 Radiographic Analysis of Temper in Ceramic Vessels : Goals and Initial Methods. Journal of Field Archaeology 9 : 183–192.Google Scholar
Chayes, F. 1954 The Theory of Thin-Section Analysis. Journal of Geology 62 : 92–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chayes, F. 1956 Petrographic Modal Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Chayes, F., and Fairbairn, H. W. 1951 A Test of the Precision of Thin-Section Analysis by Point Counter. The American Mineralogist 36 : 704–712.Google Scholar
Cochran, W. G. 1963 Sampling Techniques. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Daniels, R. B., Gamble, E. E., Bartelli, L. J., and Nelson, L. A. 1968 Application of the Point-Count Method to Problems of Soil Morphology. Soil Science 106 : 149–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danson, E. B., and Wallace, R. M. 1956 A Petrographic Study of Gila Polychrome. American Antiquity 22 : 180–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, E. M. 1986 A Petrographic Analysis of Black Mesa Ceramics. In Spatial Organization and Trade, edited by Plog, S., pp. 114–142. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale.Google Scholar
Griffiths, J. C. 1967 Scientific Method in Analysis of Sediments. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Hantman, J. L., and Plog, S. 1982 The Relationship of Stylistic Similarity to Patterns of Material Exchange. In Contexts for Prehistoric Exchange, edited by Ericson, J. and Earle, T., pp. 237–263. Academic Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herold, E. B. (editor) 1971 The Indian Mounds at Albany, Illinois. Anthropological Papers #1. Davenport Museum, Davenport, Iowa.Google Scholar
Logan, W. D. 1976 Woodland Complexes in Northeastern Iowa. Publications in Archeology No. 15. National Park Service, Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
Matson, F. R. 1960 The Quantitative Study of Ceramic Materials. In The Application of Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, edited by Heizer, R. F. and Cook, S. F., pp. 34–51. Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology No. 28. Quadrangle Books, Chicago.Google Scholar
Matson, F. R. 1970 Some Aspects of Ceramic Technology. In Science in Archaeology, edited by Brothwell, D. and Higgs, E., pp. 592–602. Praeger, New York.Google Scholar
O' Malley, N. 1981 A Petrographic Analysis of Late Woodland Ceramics from the Sperry Site, Jackson County, Missouri. Plains Anthropologist 26 : 241–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peacock, D. P. S. 1970 The Scientific Analysis of Ancient Ceramics : A Review. World Archaeology 1 : 375–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plog, S. 1980 Stylistic Variation in Prehistoric Ceramics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, J. W. 1968 Bluff Pottery Analysis-Thin Section Experiment No. 3 : Paste and Temper Variations in One Bluff Pottery Variety. Research Report No. 5. University Museum Lithic Laboratory, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.Google Scholar
Porter, J. W. 1984 Thin Section Analysis of Ceramics. In The Robinson's Lake Site, by Miller, G. R., pp. 133–210. FAI-270 Site Reports Vol. 10. University of Illinois Press, Urbana and Chicago.Google Scholar
Rose, J. C, and Fournier, D. 1981 Petrographic Analysis of Gray Ware and Brown Ware Ceramics. In Prehistory of the St. Johns Area, East-Central Arizona : The Tep St. Johns Project, edited by Westfall, D. A., pp. 405–420. Archaeological Series No. 153. Arizona State Museum, Cultural Resource Management Division, Tucson.Google Scholar
Rugge, D., and Doyel, D. E. 1980 Petrographic Analysis of Ceramics from Dead Valley. In Prehistory in Dead Valley, East Central Arizona : The TG & E Springerville Report, edited by Doyel, D. E. and Debowsky, S. S., pp. 189–204. Archaeological Series No. 144. Arizona State Museum, Cultural Resource Management Division, Tucson.Google Scholar
Shepard, A. O. 1936 The Technology of Pecos Pottery. In The Pottery of Pecos, vol. II, edited by Kidder, A. V., pp. 389–588. Yale University Press, London.Google Scholar
Shepard, A. O. 1942 Rio Grande Glaze Paint Ware : A Study Illustrating the Place of Ceramic Technological Analysis in Archaeological Research. Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication 528 : 129–262.Google Scholar
Shepard, A. O. 1954 Ceramics for the Archaeologist. Publication 609. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
Shepard, A. O. 1965 Rio Grande Glaze-Paint Pottery : A Test of Petrographic Analysis. In Ceramics and Man, edited by Matson, F. R., pp. 62–87. Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology No. 41. Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
Shotton, F. W., and Hendry, G. L. 1979 The Developing Field of Petrology in Archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Science 6 : 75–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, M. 1963 Counting and Sampling Errors in Modal Analysis by Point Counter. Journal of Petrology 4 : 367–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steponaitis, V. P. 1983 Ceramics, Chronology, and Community Patterns. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Stoltman, J. B. 1979 Middle Woodland Stage Communities of Southwestern Wisconsin. In Hopewell Archaeology : The Chillico the Conference, edited by Brose, D. S. and Greber, N., pp. 122–139. Kent State University Press, Kent, Ohio.Google Scholar
Stoltman, J. B. 1986 The Prairie Phase : An Early Woodland Manifestation in the Upper Mississippi Valley. In Early Woodland Archaeology, edited by Farnsworth, K. B. and Emerson, T. E., pp. 121–136. Center for American Archeology Press, Kampsville, Illinois.Google Scholar
Tankersley, K., and Meinhart, J. 1982 Physical and Structural Properties of Ceramic Materials Utilized by a Fort Ancient Group. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 7 : 225–243.Google Scholar
van der Plas, L., and Tobi, A. C. 1965 A Chart for Judging the Reliability of Point Counting Results. American Journal of Science 263(1) : 87–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weibel, E. R., and Elias, H. (editors) 1967 Quantitative Methods in Morphology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar