Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T13:59:25.701Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A New Method for Describing and Analyzing Artifact Shape

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Harold L. Dibble  and
Philip G. Chase
Harold L. Dibble
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721
Philip G. Chase
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A simple, yet objective and replicable method for recording a number of variables of the two-dimensional morphology of artifacts is presented and described. This method permits precise quantification of variables such as artifact shape and area, retouch length along the perimeter of chipped stone tools, measures of convexity or concavity, area and location of cortex, etc. Moreover, it allows for direct comparisons among varied artifact assemblages.

Type
Reports
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 46 , Issue 1 , January 1981 , pp. 178 - 187
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Baumler, M. F. 1979 Analytic comparability among flake measurement techniques in lithic analysis. Paper presentedat the 44th annual meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Vancouver, B. C. Google Scholar
Chase, P. G. and Dibble, H. L. 1979 Changes in shapes of flakes from Tabun, Israel. Paper presented at the 44th annual meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Vancouver, B. C. Google Scholar
Copeland, L. 1975 The Middle and Upper Paleolithic of Lebanon and Syria in the light of recent research. In Problemsin prehistory: North Africa and the Levant, edited by Wendorf, F. and E, A. Marks, pp. 317–350. Southern Methodist University Press, Dallas.Google Scholar
Fish, P. R. 1978 Consistency in archaeological measurement and classification. American Antiquity 43:86–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrod, D. A. E., and Bate, D. M. A. 1937 The Stone Age of Mount Carmel: Volume I, excavations at the Wadi el-Mughara. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Irwin, H. T., Hurd, D. J., and Lajeunesse, R. M. 1971 Description and measurement in anthropology, computer series 1. Laboratory of Anthropology Report of Investigations, Number 48. Washington State University.Google Scholar
Jelinek, A. I. 1977 A preliminary study of flakes from the Tabun Cave, Mount Carmel. In Moshe Stekelis Memorial Volume, edited by Arensburg, B. and Bar, O.-Yosef. Eretz-Israel 13.Google Scholar
Jelinek, A. J., Farrand, W. R., Haas, G., Horowitz, A., and Goldberg, P. 1973 New excavations at the Tabun Cave, Mount Carmel, Israel, 1967-72: a preliminary report. Paidorient 1(2):151–183.Google Scholar
Leach, B. F. 1969 The concept of similarity in prehistoric studies. Anthropology Department, University of Otago, Studies in Prehistoric Anthropology 1. Otago, New Zealand.Google Scholar