Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T13:35:57.917Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Megascopic and Petrographic Analyses of a Foreign Pottery Vessel from the Cahokia Site

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Charles J. Bareis  and
James Warren Porter
Charles J. Bareis
Affiliation:
University of IllinoisUrbana, Illinois
James Warren Porter
Affiliation:
University of IllinoisUrbana, Illinois
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A decorated pottery vessel excavated at the Cahokia site in southwestern Illinois is believed to be a specimen from the southeastern United States. A megascopic and a petrographic analysis are presented to confirm a southern origin. The megascopic analysis suggests that the vessel is of Caddoan derivation. The petrographic analysis demonstrates that the paste of the vessel is not indigenous to the American Bottoms and suggests the use of weathered Tertiary shale deposits from the lower Mississippi River Valley. Both analytical procedures are required in order to assess adequately the sources of origin for suspected foreign pottery specimens in archaeological sites.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , July 1965 , pp. 95 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, V. T. 1935 Petrography and Origin of the Fuller’s (Bleaching) Earth of Southeastern Missouri. Missouri Geological Survey, Biennial Report of the State Geologist, pp. 72–8. Jefferson City.Google Scholar
Bareis, C. J. 1963 University of Illinois Projects, New Field Work. In “Second Annual Report: American Bottoms Archaeology, July 1, 1962–June 30, 1963,” edited by M. L. Fowler, pp. 4–8. Illinois Archaeological Survey, University of Illinois, Urbana.Google Scholar
Carss, Brian 1962 Progress Report on the Clay Mineral Analyses of Pottery and Soils Recovered from the American Bottoms. In “First Annual Report: American Bottoms Archaeology, July 1, 1961–June 30, 1962,” edited by M. L. Fowler, pp. 10–12. Illinois Archaeological Survey, University of Illinois, Urbana.Google Scholar
Dick, G. C. 1955 Incised Pottery Decorations from Cahokia, a Middle Mississippi Site in Western Illinois. The Missouri Archaeologist, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 36–48. Columbia.Google Scholar
Ford, J. A. 1951 Greenhouse: A Troyville-Coles Creek Period Site in Avoyelles Parish, Louisiana. Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History, Vol. 44, Pt. 1. New York.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. B. 1949 The Cahokia Ceramic Complexes. In Proceedings of the Fifth Plains Conference for Archaeology, edited by J. L. Champe, pp. 44–58. University of Nebraska, Lincoln.Google Scholar
Griffith, R. J. 1962 Ramey Incised Pottery. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.Google Scholar
Grim, R. E. 1934 Petrology of the Kaolin Deposits near Anna, Illinois. Economic Geology, Vol. 39, pp. 659–70. Lancaster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grim, R. E. 1936 The Eocene Sediments of Mississippi. Mississippi State Geological Survey, Bulletin 30. Jackson.Google Scholar
Grim, R. E. 1941 Petrographic and Ceramic Properties of Pennsylvanian Shales of Illinois. Illinois State Geological Survey, Report of Investigations, No. 72. Urbana.Google Scholar
Kerr, P. F. 1959 Optical Mineralogy. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.Google Scholar
Lemley, H. J. 1936 Discoveries Indicating a Pre-Caddo Culture on Red River in Arkansas. Bulletin of the Texas Archeological and Paleontological Society, Vol. 8, pp. 25–55. Abilene.Google Scholar
Lindsay, W. L., Frazier, A. W., and Stephenson, H. F. 1962 Identification of Reaction Products from Phosphate Fertilizers in Soils. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings, Vol. 26, No. 5, pp. 446–52. Danville.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, H. P. and Krieger, A. D. 1949 The George C. Davis Site, Cherokee County, Texas. Memoirs of the Society for American Archaeology, No. 5, Menasha.Google Scholar
Porter, J. W. 1962 Temper in Bluff Pottery from the Cahokia Area. Research Report, No. 1. Lithic Laboratory, Southern Illinois University Museum, Carbondale.Google Scholar
Porter, J. W. 1964 Comment on Weaver’s “Technological Analysis of Lower Mississippi Ceramics.” American Antiquity, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 520–1. Salt Lake City.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Titterington, P. F. 1938 For Identification. American Antiquity, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 354–5. Menasha.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, E. C. 1963 Technological Analysis of Prehistoric Lower Mississippi Ceramic Materials: A Preliminary Report. American Antiquity, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 49–56. Salt Lake City.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willey, G. R. 1949 Archaeology of the Florida Gulf Coast. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, Vol. 113. Washington.Google Scholar