Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T13:25:12.315Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Maya Lowland Ceramics: A Report from the 1965 Guatemala City Conference

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A conference of archaeologists interested in the ceramics of the Maya Lowlands was held in Guatemala City in August, 1965. The conference had as goals the substantive comparison of ceramic complexes and the consideration of theoretical and methodological problems associated with the use of the type-variety approach to ceramic analysis. Comparison produced an arrangement of ceramic complexes from 10 sites in terms of typological horizons established on the basis of horizon markers-chronologically specific traits shared by two or more complexes. Close historical connections between sites were given formal recognition by the definition of ceramic spheres composed of complexes from different sites demonstrating a high degree of content similarity for specific time intervals. Changes in the extent and nature of ceramic spheres through time suggest variations in the intensity of technological culture contact within the Maya Lowlands. The theoretical and practical implications of analytical tools such as type, ware, facet, sub-complex, complex, sphere, and phase were discussed with resultant modifications and clarifications of definitions and methodological procedures.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , July 1967 , pp. 289 - 315
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Adams, R. E. W. 1963 The Ceramic Sequence at Altar de Sacrificios, Guatemala. MS, doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Andrews, E. W. 1962 Excavaciones en Dzibilchalrún, Yucatan. Estudios de Cultura Maya, Vol. II, pp. 149–83. Mexico.Google Scholar
Boas, Franz 1913 Archaeological Investigations in the Valley of Mexico by the International School, 1911–1912. Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Congress of Americanists, pp. 176–9. London.Google Scholar
Brainerd, G. W. 1958 The Archaeological Ceramics of Yucatán. Anthropological Records, Vol. 19. Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Bullard, W. R. Jr. 1960 The Maya Settlement Pattern in Northeastern Perén, Guatemala. American Antiquity, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 355–72. Salt Lake City.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, Joseph R. 1964 Interaction Spheres in Prehistory. Illinois State Museum Scientific Papers, Vol. 12, No. 6, pp. 133–43. Springfield.Google Scholar
Coe, William R. 1962 A Summary of Excavation and Research at Tikal, Guatemala: 1956–61. American Antiquity, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 479–507. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Culbert, T. Patrick 1965 The Ceramic History of the Central Highlands of Chiapas, Mexico. Papers of the New World Archaeological Foundation, Publication 14, No. 19. Provo.Google Scholar
Deetz, James 1965 The Dynamics of Stylistic Change in Arikara Ceramics. Illinois Studies in Anthropology, No. 4. Urbana.Google Scholar
Dixon, K. A. 1959 Ceramics from Two Preclassic Periods at Chiapa de Corzo, Chiapas, Mexico. Papers of the New World Archaeological Foundation, Publication 4, No. 5. Orinda.Google Scholar
Gamio, Manuel 1913 Arqueologia de Azcapotzalco, D.F. Mexico. Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Congress of Americanists, pp. 180–93. London.Google Scholar
Gifford, James C. 1960 The Type-Variety Method of Ceramic Classification as an Indicator of Cultural Phenomena. American Antiquity, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 341–7. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Longacre, William A. 1964 Sociological Implications of the Ceramic Analysis. In “Chapters in the Prehistory of Eastern Arizona, II.” Fieldiana: Anthropology, Vol. 55, pp. 155–70. Chicago.Google Scholar
Merwin, R. E. and Vaillant, G. C. 1931 The Ruins of Holmul, Guatemala. Memoirs of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University, Vol. 3, No. 2. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rands, R. L. 1962 Review of “The Chronological Significance of Maya Ceramics,” by G. C. Vaillant. American Antiquity, Vol. 28, No. 1, p. 225. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Ricketson, O. G. Jr., and Ricketson, E. B. 1937 Uaxactún, Guatemala: Group E—1926–1931. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Publication 477. Washington.Google Scholar
Rouse, Irving 1960 The Classification of Artifacts in Archaeology. American Antiquity, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 313–23. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Smith, R. E. 1955 Ceramic Sequence at Uaxactún, Guatemala. Middle American Research Institute, Publication 20, Vol. 1. New Orleans.Google Scholar
Smith, R. E., Willey, G. R., and Gifford, J. C. 1960 The Type-Variety Concept as a Basis for the Analysis of Maya Pottery. American Antiquity, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 330–40. Salt Lake City.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spinden, H. J. 1924 The Reduction of Mayan Dates. Papers of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University, Vol. 6, No. 4. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Struever, Stuart 1964 The Hopewell Interaction Sphere in Riverine-Western Great Lakes Culture History. Illinois State Museum Scientific Papers, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 85–106. Springfield.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. Eric S. 1931 Archaeological Investigations in the Southern Cayo District, British Honduras. Field Museum of Natural History, Publication 301. Chicago.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. Eric S. 1935 Maya Chronology: The Correlation Question. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Publication 456, Contribution 14, pp. 52–104. Washington.Google Scholar
Vaillant, G. C. 1927 The Chronological Significance of Maya Ceramics. On microcard, Archives of Archaeology, No. 12. Madison.Google Scholar
Warren, Bruce W. 1961 The Archaeological Sequence at Chiapa de Corzo. In “Los Mayas del Sur y Sus Relaciones con los Nahuas Meridionales.” Sociedad Mexicans de Antropología, VIII Mesa Redonda, pp. 75–83. Mexico.Google Scholar
Warren, Bruce W. 1967 Computers in Archaeology. MS, to be published in Pennsylvania Archaeologist. Google Scholar
Wheat, J. B., Gifford, J. C., and Wasley, W. W. 1958 Ceramic Variety, Type Cluster, and Ceramic System in Southwestern Pottery Analysis. American Antiquity, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 34–47. Salt Lake City.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willey, G. R., Bullard, W. R. Jr., Glass, J. B., and Gifford, J. C. 1965 Prehistoric Maya Settlements in the Belize Valley. Papers of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University, Vol. 54. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Willey, G. R., Ekholm, G. F., and Millon, R. F. 1964 The Patterns of Farming Life and Civilization. In Handbook of Middle American Indians, edited by Robert Wauchope, Vol. 1, pp. 446–98. University of Texas Press, Austin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willey, G. R. and Gifford, J. C. 1961 Pottery of the Holmul I Style from Barton Ramie, British Honduras. In Essays in PreColumbian Art and Archaeology, edited by Samuel K. Lothrop, pp. 152–70. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Willey, G. R. and Phillips, Philip 1958 Method and Theory in American Archaeology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar