Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T07:38:59.343Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Integrated Remote Sensing and Excavation at Double Ditch State Historic Site, North Dakota

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Kenneth L. Kvamme  and
Stanley A. Ahler
Kenneth L. Kvamme
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Old Main 330, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
Stanley A. Ahler
Affiliation:
PaleoCultural Research Group, P.O. Box EE, Flagstaff, AZ 86002
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A four-year program of remote sensing at the Double Ditch State Historic Site (32BL8) demonstrates the utility of combined prospecting methods for understanding complex settlements when combined with traditional excavation methods. Magnetic gradiometry revealed countless subterranean storage pits, hearths, and two previously unknown fortification systems that vastly increase the settlement's area and projected population to perhaps 2,000 individuals. Electrical resistance surveys helped define middens, other depositional areas, houses, and earth-borrowing pits. Ground-penetrating radar yielded details about ditch, house, and mounded midden interior forms. Aerial survey from a powered parachute acquired high-resolution digital color and thermal infrared imagery. The former distinguished houses, borrow pits, and ditches from middens and fill areas by changes in vegetation; the latter did the same through temperature variations that also highlighted historic excavations. High-resolution topographic survey allowed documentation of topographic expressions caused by ditches, houses, borrow pits, and mounds. The remote sensing program reduced excavation costs by targeting features. Excavations confirmed anomaly identifications and established a chronology that documents late-fifteenth-century origins to an ultimate contraction in the eighteenth century, with abandonment after a smallpox outbreak about A.D. 1785. Evidence suggests that large mounds formed integral components of the village"s defenses. Excavations also reveal extensive earth moving for mound building, earthlodge coverings, and other reasons still unclear. This practice caused the truncation or obliteration of many earlier archaeological features and forces realization that long-occupied settlements were fluid through time with continual reworking of deposits, and complex depositional, use, and formation histories.

Résumé

Résumé

Un programa de cuatro años de percepción remota en el sitio histórico Double Ditch (32BL8) demuestra la efectividad de combinar métodos múltiples de búsqueda con métodos tradicionales de excavación para comprender e interpretar establecimientos que presentan un cuadro complejo. El uso de gradiometría magnética revela incontablesfosos de almacenamiento subterráneos, calderas, y dos sistemas de fortificación previamente desconocidos. Esto aumenta considerablemente el área de establecimiento y estima su población a quizás 2000 individuos. Un reconocimiento de resistencia eléectrica define estratos que presentan acumulación de derivados relacionados con actividad humana, otras áreas de depósito, casas y fosos de abastecimiento de tierra para usos diversos. Radares de penetración de suelo proporcionan detalles sobre zanjas, casas y también la composición interior de depósitos de acumulación de derivados. Imágenes desde un paracaídas eléctrico de alta resolución digital y de visión térmica infrarroja permiten distinguir claramente entre casas, fosos de abastecimiento, zanjas y las áreas de sedimento y de saturación a través de los cambios en la vegetación o variaciones en la temperatura que también distinguen excavaciones históricas. Inspecciones topográficas de alta resolución documentan expresiones en la topografía causadas por zanjas, casas, fosos de abastecimiento y apilamientos de tierra o terraplenes. El programa de percepción remota redujo los costos de excavación al enfocarse en aspectos específicos de interés. Las excavaciones confirmaron identificaciones erróneas y establecieron una cronología que documenta los orígenes de este establecimiento alrededor de fines del siglo quince hasta una última contracción en el siglo dieciocho, con el abandono del establecimiento después de una epidemia de viruela alrededor de año 1785 D.C. Existe evidencia que sugiere que grandes terraplenes formaban un componente integral en la defensa de la población. Las excavaciones también revelan un extenso traslado de tierra para la construccíon de terraplenes, cubiertas de alojamientos de tierra y otras razones todavía sin aclarar. Esta práctica causó la obliteracíon o desaparición de muchos aspectos arqueológicos anteriores y fuerza a la conclusión de que establecimientos ocupados por largo tiempo fueron inconstantes a través del tiempo con una continua re-elaboración de depósitos y con una historia compleja de uso y formación de depósitos.

Type
Reports
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 72 , Issue 3 , July 2007 , pp. 539 - 561
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Ahler, Stanley A. 2004 Artifact Densities, Spatial Patterns, and Settlement Dynamics. In Archaeological Investigations During 2003 at Double Ditch State Historic Site, North Dakota, edited by Stanley A. Ahler, pp. 295–314. Unpublished report by PaleoCultural Research Group, Flagstaff, Arizona, submitted to the State Historical Society of North Dakota, Bismarck.Google Scholar
Ahler, Stanley A. 2005a Pit Excavations. In Archaeological Investigations During 2004 at Double Ditch State Historic Site, North Dakota, edited by Stanley A. Ahler, pp. 77–137. Unpublished report by PaleoCultural Research Group, Flagstaff, Arizona, submitted to the State Historical Society of North Dakota, Bismarck.Google Scholar
Ahler, Stanley A. 2005b Coring, Trenching, and Site Periphery Studies. In Archaeological Investigations During 2004 at Double Ditch State Historic Site, North Dakota, edited by Stanley A. Ahler, pp. 63–76. Unpublished report by PaleoCultural Research Group, Flagstaff, Arizona, submitted to the State Historical Society of North Dakota, Bismarck.Google Scholar
Ahler, Stanley A. 2005c Analytic Structure and Collection Chronology. In Archaeological Investigations During 2004 at Double Ditch State Historic Site, North Dakota, edited by Stanley A. Ahler, pp. 157–180. Unpublished report by PaleoCultural Research Group, Flagstaff, Arizona, submitted to the State Historical Society of North Dakota, Bismarck.Google Scholar
Ahler, Stanley A. (editor) 2003 Archaeological Investigations During 2001 and 2002 at Double Ditch State Historic Site, North Dakota. Unpublished report by PaleoCultural Research Group, Flagstaff, Arizona, submitted to the State Historical Society of North Dakota, Bismarck.Google Scholar
Ahler, Stanley A. 2004 Archaeological Investigations During 2003 at Double Ditch State Historic Site, North Dakota. Unpublished report by PaleoCultural Research Group, Flagstaff, Arizona, submitted to the State Historical Society of North Dakota, Bismarck.Google Scholar
Ahler, Stanley A. 2005 Archaeological Investigations During 2004 at Double Ditch State Historic Site, North Dakota. Unpublished report by PaleoCultural Research Group, Flagstaff, Arizona, submitted to the State Historical Society of North Dakota, Bismarck.Google Scholar
Ahler, Stanley A., and Swenson, Fern E. 2003 Investigations during 2001. In Archaeological Investigations during 2001 and 2002 at Double Ditch State Historic Site, North Dakota, edited by Stanley A. Ahler, pp. 35–52. Unpublished report by PaleoCultural Research Group, Flagstaff, Arizona, submitted to the State Historical Society of North Dakota, Bismarck.Google Scholar
Bales, Jennifer R., and Kvamme, Kenneth L. 2005 Geophysical Signatures of Earthlodges in the Dakotas. In Plains Earthlodges: Ethnographic and Archaeological Perspectives, edited by Donna C. Roper and Elizabeth P. Pauls, pp. 157–183. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Berlin, G. Lennis, Richard Ambler, J., Hevly, Richard H., and Schaber, Gerald G. 1977 Identification of a Sinagua Agricultural Field by Aerial Thermography, Soil Chemistry, Pollen/Plant Analysis, and Archaeology. American Antiquity 42:588–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrough, Peter A., and McDonnell, Rachael A. 1998 Principles of Geographical Information Systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Clark, Anthony 2000 Seeing Beneath the Soil: Prospection Methods in Archaeology. Reprinted. Routledge, London. Originally Published 1990, B.T. Batsford Ltd., London.Google Scholar
Clay, R. Berle 2001 Complementary Geophysical Survey Techniques: Why Two Ways are Always Better than One. Southeastern Archaeology 20:31–43.Google Scholar
Conyers, Lawrence B. 2004 Ground-penetrating Radar for Archaeology. AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek, California.Google Scholar
Crawford, George T. 2003 Investigations at Will and Spinden's Triangle. In Archaeological Investigations during 2001 and 2002 at Double Ditch State Historic Site, North Dakota, edited by Stanley A. Ahler, pp. 61–74. Unpublished report by PaleoCultural Research Group, Flagstaff, Arizona, submitted to the State Historical Society of North Dakota, Bismarck.Google Scholar
Crawford, George T, and Ahler, Stanley A. 2003a Fortification Trench Excavations. In Archaeological Investigations During 2001 and 2002 at Double Ditch State Historic Site, North Dakota, edited by Stanley A. Ahler, pp. 95–113. Unpublished report by PaleoCultural Research Group, Flagstaff, Arizona, submitted to the State Historical Society of North Dakota, Bismarck.Google Scholar
Crawford, George T, and Ahler, Stanley A. 2003b Mound B Excavations. In Archaeological Investigations during 2001 and 2002 at Double Ditch State Historic Site, North Dakota, edited by Stanley A. Ahler, pp. 75–94. Unpublished report by PaleoCultural Research Group, Flagstaff, Arizona, submitted to the State Historical Society of North Dakota, Bismarck.Google Scholar
Dabas, Michel, and Tabbagh, Alain 2000 Thermal Prospecting. In Archaeological Method and Theory: An Encyclopedia, edited by L. Ellis, pp. 626–630. Garland Publishing, New York.Google Scholar
Dalan, Rinita A. 2006 Magnetic Susceptibility. In Remote Sensing in Archaeology: An Explicitly North American Perspective, edited by Jay K. Johnson, pp. 161–203. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Dalan, Rinita A. 2008 Magnetic Susceptibility in North American Archaeological Geophysicical Studies: Recent Developments and Prospects. Archaeological Prospection, in press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaffney, Christopher, and Gater, John 2003 Revealing the Buried Past: Geophysics for Archaeologists. Tempus Publishing, Stroud, England.Google Scholar
Geib, Phil R. 2004a House Investigations. In Archaeological Investigations During 2003 at Double Ditch State Historic Site. North Dakota, edited by Stanley A. Ahler, pp. 105–121. Unpublished report by PaleoCultural Research Group, Flagstaff, Arizona, submitted to the State Historical Society of North Dakota, Bismarck.Google Scholar
Geib, Phil R. 2004b Mound Investigations. In Archaeological Investigations during 2003 at Double Ditch State Historic Site, North Dakota, edited by Stanley A. Ahler, pp. 31–96. Unpublished report by PaleoCultural Research Group, Flagstaff, Arizona, submitted to the State Historical Society of North Dakota, Bismarck.Google Scholar
Hailey, Thomas I. 2005 The Powered Parachute as an Archaeological Aerial Reconnaissance Vehicle. Archaeological Prospection 12:69–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hargrave, Michael L. 2006 Ground Truthing the Results of Geophysical Surveys. In Remote Sensing in Archaeology: An Explicitly North American Perspective, edited by Jay K. Johnson, pp. 269–304. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Johnson, Jay K. (editor) 2006 Remote Sensing in Archaeology: An Explicitly North American Perspective. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Johnson, Jay K., and Haley, Bryan S. 2006 A Cost-benefit Analysis of Remote Sensing Application in Cultural Resource Management Archaeology. In Remote Sensing in Archaeology: An Explicitly North American Perspective, edited by Jay K. Johnson, pp. 33–45. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Jones, Kevin 2000 Native Grasslands and Stabilization of Earthwork Archaeological Sites on the Middle Missouri River, North Dakota. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites 4:139–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kvamme, Kenneth L. 2000 Geophysical Explorations at Double Ditch Indian Village State Park (32BL8), Burleigh County, North Dakota. Unpublished report on file at the State Historical Society of North Dakota, Bismarck.Google Scholar
Kvamme, Kenneth L. 2001 Current Practices in Archaeogeophysics: Magnetics, Resistivity, Conductivity, and Ground-Penetrating Radar. In Earth Sciences and Archaeology, edited by Paul Goldberg, Vance Holliday, and C R. Ferring, pp. 353–384. Kluwer/Plenum Publishers, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kvamme, Kenneth L. 2002 Report of Geophysical Findings at the Double Ditch State Historic Site (32BL8): 2001 Investigations. Unpublished report on file at the State Historical Society of North Dakota, Bismarck.Google Scholar
Kvamme, Kenneth L. 2003a Multidimensional Prospecting in North American Great Plains Village Sites. Archaeological Prospection 10:131–142.Google Scholar
Kvamme, Kenneth L. 2003b Geophysical Findings at the Double Ditch State Historic Site (32BL8), North Dakota, 2002. Unpublished report on file at the State Historical Society of North Dakota, Bismarck.Google Scholar
Kvamme, Kenneth L. 2003c Geophysical Surveys as Landscape Archaeology. American Antiquity 68:435–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kvamme, Kenneth L. 2004 Geophysical Findings at Double Ditch State Historic Site (32BL8), North Dakota, 2003. Unpublished report submitted to the State Historical Society of North Dakota, Bismarck.Google Scholar
Kvamme, Kenneth L. 2006a Final Report of Geophysical Findings at Double Ditch State Historic Site (32BL8), North Dakota, 2001–2004. Unpublished report on file at the State Historical Society of North Dakota, Bismarck.Google Scholar
Kvamme, Kenneth L. 2006b Magnetometry: Nature’s Gift to Archaeology. In Remote Sensing in Archaeology: An Explicitly North American Perspective, edited by Jay K. Johnson, pp. 205–233. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Kvamme, Kenneth L., Ernenwein, Eileen G., and Markussen, Christine J. 2006 Robotic Total Station for Microtopographic Mapping: An Example from the Northern Great Plains. Archaeological Prospection 13:91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markussen, Christine J. 2005 Analysis of Archaeological Geophysics at Double Ditch State Historic Site, N.D. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Mark D. 2007 Conflict and Cooperation in the Northern Middle Missouri, A.D. 1450–1650. In Plains Village Archaeology: Bison Hunting Farmers in the Central and Northern Plains, edited by Marvin Kay and Stanley Ahler. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, in press.Google Scholar
Moulton, Gary E. 2003 The Lewis and Clark Journals: An American Epic of Discovery (Abridged Edition). University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.Google Scholar
Newman, Connor 1992 The Tara Survey: Interim Report. In Discovery Programme Reports 1: Project Results 1992. Royal Irish Academy, Discovery Programme, Dublin.Google Scholar
Weymouth, John W. 1979 Technical Developments and Results of the 1977 Season of the Great Plains Magnetic Surveying Program. Archaeo-Physica 10:710–717.Google Scholar
Weymouth, John W. 1986 Geophysical Methods of Archaeological Site Surveying. In Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 9, edited by Michael B. Schiffer, pp. 311–395. Academic Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weymouth, John W., and Nickel, Robert K. 1977 A Magnetometer Survey of the Knife River Indian Villages. Plains Anthropologist Memoir 13:104–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Will, George R, and Spinden, Herbert J. 1906 The Mandans: A Study of their Culture, Archaeology and Language. Papers of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Willey, P., and Emerson, Thomas E. 1993 The Osteology and Archaeology of the Crow Creek Massacre. Plains Anthropologist Memoir 27:227–269.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. R. 2000 Air Photo Interpretationfor Archaeologists (2nd ed.), Tempus Publishing, Great Britain.Google Scholar
Wood, W. Raymond 1967 An Interpretation ofMandan Culture History. River Basin Surveys Papers 39, Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 198, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar